Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

SprintsQ VS Zombie.js

Compare SprintsQ VS Zombie.js and see what are their differences

SprintsQ logo SprintsQ

Automate repetitive manual tests and save 10X your time.

Zombie.js logo Zombie.js

JavaScript browser designed to functionally test websites your running locally.
  • SprintsQ SprintsQ
    SprintsQ //
    2024-01-17
  • SprintsQ Sample Test Case
    Sample Test Case //
    2024-01-17

SprintsQ is a no-code test automation platform, which helps to automate repetitive manual tests without code. With SprintsQ you can create test cases just like creating manual tests and run them on the cloud without any configuration. You can monitor the tests at regular intervals and also you can integrate your tests into the CI/CD pipeline.

  • Zombie.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-24

SprintsQ

$ Details
paid Free Trial $79.0 / Monthly (Unlimited Users, Unlimited Projects, Unlimited test executions)
Platforms
Web
Release Date
2023 December

Zombie.js

Pricing URL
-
$ Details
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

SprintsQ features and specs

  • Cloud testing
  • Record and playback
  • Schedule runs
  • CI/CD integrations

Zombie.js features and specs

  • Headless Testing
    Zombie.js is a headless browser intended for automated testing of web apps, enabling fast execution of tests without the need for a graphical user interface.
  • Fast Execution
    Due to its lightweight nature, Zombie.js is generally faster than full-fledged browsers like Chrome or Firefox when used for testing purposes.
  • JavaScript-Driven
    Written in JavaScript, Zombie.js integrates well with JavaScript-based web applications and is suitable for developers already familiar with the language.
  • Simple API
    Zombie.js offers a simple, straightforward API for simulating user interactions and navigating web pages, which can help streamline the testing process.
  • Active Community
    Being an open-source project, Zombie.js has an active community, offering a range of plugins and helpful resources for developers.

Possible disadvantages of Zombie.js

  • Limited Features
    Compared to full-fledged browsers, Zombie.js may lack certain features or behaviors that can limit its ability to fully simulate a real browser environment.
  • Debugging Challenges
    Since it operates in a headless environment, debugging issues can be more challenging than when using browsers with a GUI, requiring additional tools or logging.
  • Maintenance
    As a library, Zombie.js relies on community contributions for updates and bug fixes, which could potentially result in slower resolutions for some issues.
  • Compatibility
    While capable of handling many JavaScript tasks, Zombie.js may face compatibility issues with some newer web technologies or complex web applications.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its simple API, developers who are new to headless browsers or JavaScript testing frameworks might encounter a learning curve to effectively utilize Zombie.js.

SprintsQ videos

SprintsQ - Quick Demo

Zombie.js videos

No Zombie.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to SprintsQ and Zombie.js)
Browser Testing
82 82%
18% 18
Testing
74 74%
26% 26
Software Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Automated Testing
0 0%
100% 100

Questions and Answers

As answered by people managing SprintsQ and Zombie.js.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

SprintsQ's answer

MERN, Playwright, Digital Ocean

What makes your product unique?

SprintsQ's answer

Easy test maintenance and fast execution.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

SprintsQ's answer

SprintsQ's pre-built actions helps you to create tests like writing your manual cases, zero coding required. You don't need to locate elements by id, css, Xpath. You can easily locate by it's name and role.

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

SprintsQ's answer

-Arma Chat -Litz Tech

User comments

Share your experience with using SprintsQ and Zombie.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Zombie.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

SprintsQ mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of SprintsQ yet. Tracking of SprintsQ recommendations started around Jan 2024.

Zombie.js mentions (1)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing SprintsQ and Zombie.js, you can also consider the following products

Testsigma - Complete AI-driven Test Automation platform for Web apps, Mobile apps and APIs. Simple English commands to automate complex tests easily and effectively with all the flexibility that enterprise teams need!

puppeteer - Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome or Chromium...

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Nightwatch.js - Write efficient and straightforward end-to-end tests in Node.js which run against a Selenium/WebDriver server.

DogQ.io - No-code tests in cloud for web developers with all skill levels

Phantomjs - PhantomJS is a headless browser that works hand in hand with Selenium to help developers more efficiently test their sites and apps.