Spoke by Mozilla VS Sceelix

Unpopular opinion: Mozilla has some unique advantage to win the 3D Web. 1/ Hubs and spoke (https://hubs.mozilla.com/spoke) are trying to solve the problem of how to composite and deliver 3D assets over web protocol. 1.1/ Unlike jpegs that can be passively embedded into web pages, 3D assets requires active interactions with other objects. 1.2/ Traditionally, we need a 3D game engine to pack all the assets into one... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

I love this product, and I don't get the negativity here. For NFTs it is perfect as a gallery that you can join with people to present your work. You can meet up. There is an editor where you can model spaces. Do I miss something? Is there something else with multiple user capacity and ease of development? https://hubs.mozilla.com/spoke. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

This is probably the absolute quickest way to do it: https://hubs.mozilla.com/spoke. Source: almost 3 years ago

I'm biased since I am part of the team that built it, but I think Spoke is also a good option for ease-of-use https://hubs.mozilla.com/spoke. Source: about 3 years ago

You could use Sceelix's procedural generation engine, which is now open source: https://sceelix.com, where you can generate terrains, roads, cities, etc. Source: almost 3 years ago

Many years ago ( about 4-5) there were a couple of posts regarding Sceelix - a 3D procedural engine that works quite well with Unity or standalone. Found a folder on my computer and had a look - it is now open-source over on GitHub. Source: almost 3 years ago