Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Spark Streaming VS SQLAlchemy

Compare Spark Streaming VS SQLAlchemy and see what are their differences

Draxlr
Turn SQL Data into Decisions. Build professional dashboards and data visualizations without technical expertise. Easily embed analytics anywhere, receive automated alerts, and discover AI-powered insights all through a straightforward interface. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Spark Streaming logo Spark Streaming

Spark Streaming makes it easy to build scalable and fault-tolerant streaming applications.

SQLAlchemy logo SQLAlchemy

SQLAlchemy is the Python SQL toolkit and Object Relational Mapper that gives application developers the full power and flexibility of SQL.
  • Spark Streaming Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-10
  • SQLAlchemy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-01

Spark Streaming features and specs

  • Scalability
    Spark Streaming is highly scalable and can handle large volumes of data by distributing the workload across a cluster of machines. It leverages Apache Spark's capabilities to scale out easily and efficiently.
  • Integration
    It integrates seamlessly with other components of the Spark ecosystem, such as Spark SQL, MLlib, and GraphX, allowing for comprehensive data processing pipelines.
  • Fault Tolerance
    Spark Streaming provides fault tolerance by using Spark's micro-batching approach, which allows the system to recover data in case of a failure.
  • Ease of Use
    Spark Streaming provides high-level APIs in Java, Scala, and Python, making it relatively easy to develop and deploy streaming applications quickly.
  • Unified Platform
    It provides a unified platform for both batch and streaming data processing, allowing reuse of code and resources across different types of workloads.

Possible disadvantages of Spark Streaming

  • Latency
    Spark Streaming operates on a micro-batch processing model, which introduces latency compared to real-time processing. This may not be suitable for applications requiring immediate responses.
  • Complexity
    While it integrates well with other Spark components, building complex streaming applications can still be challenging and may require expertise in distributed systems and stream processing concepts.
  • Resource Management
    Efficiently managing cluster resources and tuning the system can be difficult, especially when dealing with variable workload and ensuring optimal performance.
  • Backpressure Handling
    Handling backpressure effectively can be a challenge in Spark Streaming, requiring careful management to prevent resource saturation or data loss.
  • Limited Windowing Support
    Compared to some stream processing frameworks, Spark Streaming has more limited options for complex windowing operations, which can restrict some advanced use cases.

SQLAlchemy features and specs

  • Flexibility
    SQLAlchemy offers a high degree of flexibility for developers, allowing them to use raw SQL, an ORM, or a combination of both, which makes it adaptable to different use cases and preferences.
  • Database Agnosticism
    It supports a wide range of database backends (e.g., PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite) without needing to alter application code, facilitating easier transitions between databases.
  • Powerful ORM
    Its ORM component provides powerful object-relational mapping capabilities, making complex query construction and database interaction easier by using Pythonic objects.
  • Robust Query Construction
    SQLAlchemy offers advanced query construction capabilities, enabling developers to build complex and dynamic queries efficiently.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    The library comes with extensive and well-maintained documentation, which helps in easing the learning curve and troubleshooting issues.

Possible disadvantages of SQLAlchemy

  • Learning Curve
    Due to its extensive features and flexibility, SQLAlchemy can have a steep learning curve for beginners, especially those new to databases or ORMs.
  • Complexity
    For simple CRUD applications, using SQLAlchemy might be overkill and adds unnecessary complexity compared to simpler ORM solutions like Django ORM.
  • Performance Overhead
    While powerful, the ORM layer may introduce some performance overhead compared to writing raw SQL, which can be a consideration for performance-critical applications.
  • Verbose Syntax
    The syntax, especially when using the ORM, can become verbose, which might be cumbersome for developers preferring succinct code.
  • Debugging Challenges
    Debugging complex object-relational mapping logic can be challenging, and pinpointing issues may require a deep understanding of both the database and SQLAlchemy's intricacies.

Spark Streaming videos

+ Add

Spark Streaming Vs Kafka Streams || Which is The Best for Stream Processing?

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Spark Streaming Vs Structured Streaming Comparison | Big Data Hadoop Tutorial

SQLAlchemy videos

+ Add

SQLAlchemy ORM for Beginners

More videos:

  • Review - SQLAlchemy: Connecting to a database
  • Review - Mike Bayer: Introduction to SQLAlchemy - PyCon 2014

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Spark Streaming and SQLAlchemy)

Spark Streaming

SQLAlchemy

Stream Processing
100 100%
Stream Processing
0% 0
Databases
0 0%
Databases
100% 100
Data Management
100 100%
Data Management
0% 0
Development
0 0%
Development
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Spark Streaming and SQLAlchemy. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Spark Streaming should be more popular than SQLAlchemy. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Spark Streaming mentions (5)

  • RisingWave Turns Four: Our Journey Beyond Democratizing Stream Processing
    The last decade saw the rise of open-source frameworks like Apache Flink, Spark Streaming, and Apache Samza. These offered more flexibility but still demanded significant engineering muscle to run effectively at scale. Companies using them often needed specialized stream processing engineers just to manage internal state, tune performance, and handle the day-to-day operational challenges. The barrier to entry... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Streaming Data Alchemy: Apache Kafka Streams Meet Spring Boot
    Apache Spark Streaming: Offers micro-batch processing, suitable for high-throughput scenarios that can tolerate slightly higher latency. https://spark.apache.org/streaming/. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Choosing Between a Streaming Database and a Stream Processing Framework in Python
    Other stream processing engines (such as Flink and Spark Streaming) provide SQL interfaces too, but the key difference is a streaming database has its storage. Stream processing engines require a dedicated database to store input and output data. On the other hand, streaming databases utilize cloud-native storage to maintain materialized views and states, allowing data replication and independent storage scaling. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Machine Learning Pipelines with Spark: Introductory Guide (Part 1)
    Spark Streaming: The component for real-time data processing and analytics. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Spark for beginners - and you
    Is a big data framework and currently one of the most popular tools for big data analytics. It contains libraries for data analysis, machine learning, graph analysis and streaming live data. In general Spark is faster than Hadoop, as it does not write intermediate results to disk. It is not a data storage system. We can use Spark on top of HDFS or read data from other sources like Amazon S3. It is the designed... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

SQLAlchemy mentions (2)

  • Speak Your Queries: How Langchain Lets You Chat with Your Database
    Under the hood, LangChain works with SQLAlchemy to connect to various types of databases. This means it can work with many popular databases, like MS SQL, MySQL, MariaDB, PostgreSQL, Oracle SQL, and SQLite. To learn more about connecting LangChain to your specific database, you can check the SQLAlchemy documentation for helpful information and requirements. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • My favorite Python packages!
    SQLModel is a library for interacting with SQL databases from Python code, using Python objects. It is designed to be intuitive, easy-to-use, highly compatible, and robust. It is powered by Pydantic and SQLAlchemy and relies on Python type annotations for maximum simplicity. The key features are: it's intuitive to write and use, highly compatible, extensible, and minimizes code duplication. The library does a lot... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Spark Streaming and SQLAlchemy, you can also consider the following products

Amazon Kinesis - Amazon Kinesis services make it easy to work with real-time streaming data in the AWS cloud.

Sequelize - Provides access to a MySQL database by mapping database entries to objects and vice-versa.

Confluent - Confluent offers a real-time data platform built around Apache Kafka.

Hibernate - Hibernate an open source Java persistence framework project.

Google Cloud Dataflow - Google Cloud Dataflow is a fully-managed cloud service and programming model for batch and streaming big data processing.

Entity Framework - See Comparison of Entity Framework vs NHibernate.

Loading...