Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Source Wireframe Kit VS Jekyll

Compare Source Wireframe Kit VS Jekyll and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Source Wireframe Kit logo Source Wireframe Kit

Library of 537 blocks for desktop and mobile prototyping

Jekyll logo Jekyll

Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.
Not present
  • Jekyll Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-17

Source Wireframe Kit features and specs

  • Comprehensive Component Library
    Source Wireframe Kit offers an extensive library of UI components that can significantly speed up the design process by providing ready-to-use elements.
  • User-Friendly
    The kit is designed to be intuitive and easy to use, making it accessible for both experienced designers and beginners.
  • Customization
    The components in the kit are highly customizable, allowing designers to easily tailor them to fit their specific project requirements.
  • High-Quality Design
    The elements in the Source Wireframe Kit are professionally designed, adhering to modern design standards and best practices.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    The kit is designed to be compatible with various platforms, making it versatile for different types of projects and devices.

Possible disadvantages of Source Wireframe Kit

  • Cost
    The Source Wireframe Kit is a premium product, which might be a barrier for small teams or individual designers with limited budgets.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly design, there may still be a learning curve for those who are new to wireframing tools or UI/UX design in general.
  • Software Requirements
    Users need to have compatible design software to use the kit, which may not be readily available to everyone.
  • Over-Reliance on Pre-Made Components
    While having a robust library of components can be a pro, it may also lead some designers to overly rely on them, potentially stifling creativity and originality.
  • Potential Bloat
    The extensive library of components can be overwhelming and may include elements that are rarely used, leading to potential bloat in design projects.

Jekyll features and specs

  • Speed and Performance
    Jekyll generates static websites, which means they load faster compared to dynamic websites. No database queries are required, reducing server overhead and improving performance.
  • Security
    Static sites have a smaller attack surface compared to dynamic sites because they don't rely on databases or server-side code. This means fewer vectors for potential compromises.
  • Simplicity
    Jekyll setups are relatively straightforward, especially if you are comfortable writing in Markdown and HTML. This can make it easier to manage and maintain your website.
  • Integration with GitHub Pages
    Jekyll is designed to work seamlessly with GitHub Pages, allowing you to host your website for free with automatic deployment directly from your GitHub repository.
  • Customizability
    Jekyll allows for extensive customization through its support for plugins, themes, and templates. This can be helpful to create a unique look and functionality for your website.

Possible disadvantages of Jekyll

  • Learning Curve
    While Jekyll is simpler than some other static site generators, it does require some familiarity with the command line, version control (Git), and YAML configuration.
  • Build Time
    For large websites, the build times can become lengthy, which can slow down the development process, especially if you are making frequent updates.
  • Lack of Real-time Content Updates
    Since Jekyll generates static sites, real-time content updates (e.g., comments, dynamic forms) aren't natively supported and require third-party services or additional tooling.
  • Dependence on Ruby
    Jekyll is built with Ruby, so you will need to have Ruby installed and occasionally deal with Ruby-specific issues. This might be a drawback for developers who are not familiar with the Ruby ecosystem.
  • Limited Built-in Functionality
    While Jekyll is very flexible, it doesn’t have built-in support for many features out of the box, which might require you to manually implement or rely on plugins.

Analysis of Source Wireframe Kit

Overall verdict

  • Overall, the Source Wireframe Kit is considered a valuable resource for designers looking to streamline their workflow and improve the quality of their wireframes. Its usability and extensive component library make it a solid choice for both beginners and experienced designers.

Why this product is good

  • The Source Wireframe Kit from source.forpeople.studio is highly regarded for its comprehensive collection of design components, user-friendly interface, and compatibility with various design tools. It is praised for helping designers create detailed wireframes efficiently, thus speeding up the design process. The kit covers a wide range of design elements, which provides flexibility and creativity when developing user interfaces.

Recommended for

  • UI/UX designers
  • Product managers
  • Design teams looking to standardize their design workflow
  • Freelancers seeking efficient tools to enhance their portfolio
  • Educators teaching wireframing and design principles

Analysis of Jekyll

Overall verdict

  • Jekyll is a good choice for individuals and organizations looking for a straightforward, reliable, and efficient way to build static websites. Its strengths include simplicity, flexibility, and strong community support, which contribute to a smooth development experience.

Why this product is good

  • Jekyll is a popular static site generator that is widely appreciated for its simplicity, speed, and ease of use. It is particularly suited for creating blogs and simple websites, leveraging Markdown and Liquid templates to generate static HTML content. Its integration with GitHub Pages also makes it a convenient choice for developers and non-developers alike who want to host their sites directly from their GitHub repositories without additional setup or cost.

Recommended for

  • Bloggers and content creators looking for a simple way to publish content online.
  • Developers who prefer writing in Markdown and managing content with a version control system.
  • Users who want to host their sites for free using GitHub Pages.
  • Anyone in need of a static site generator that is easy to set up, customize, and maintain with minimal resources.

Source Wireframe Kit videos

No Source Wireframe Kit videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Jekyll videos

Getting Started With Jekyll, The Static Site Generator

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Source Wireframe Kit and Jekyll)
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
CMS
0 0%
100% 100
Prototyping
100 100%
0% 0
Blogging
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Source Wireframe Kit and Jekyll. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Source Wireframe Kit and Jekyll

Source Wireframe Kit Reviews

We have no reviews of Source Wireframe Kit yet.
Be the first one to post

Jekyll Reviews

Best Gitbook Alternatives You Need to Try in 2023
Jekyll is a static site generator often used to create blogs and websites, similar to Gitbook in its ability to generate documentation from markdown files. Jekyll is built in Ruby and is known for its flexibility and ease of use. It also has a large community and a wide variety of plugins and themes available. Jekyll's main advantage is that it is highly customizable,...
Source: www.archbee.com
11 Popular Free And Open Source WordPress CMS alternatives in 2021
Unlike some listed alternatives, Jekyll is also a static site generator so it lays in the same category. It uses Ruby and we would say it's simpler, free, and open-source CMS software.
Source: medevel.com
10 static site generators to watch in 2021
Perhaps most conveniently described as Jekyll implemented with JavaScript rather than Ruby, Eleventy has now moved beyond that while retaining a clear and simple on-ramp, and only shipping to the browser what you tell it too. As with Jekyll and Hugo, no JavaScript frameworks are auto-baked in.
Source: www.netlify.com
Hugo vs Jekyll: an Epic Battle of Static Site Generator Themes
Jekyll isn’t strict with its content location. It expects pages in the root of your site, and will build whatever’s there. Here’s how you might organize these pages in your Jekyll site root:
9 Reasons I Think Craft is the Best CMS on the Market Today
Craft CMS is simple, minimalistic, agile and has every capability a modern CMS framework needs. Over the past ten years we have worked with every CMS you could think of (Wordpress, Drupal, Rails+ActiveAdmin, Ghost, Weebly, DjangoCMS, Jekyll, Joomla, Tumblr, Squarespace, Expression Engine, Statamic, Blogger)… here are the reasons why we’ve landed firmly with Craft as our №1...
Source: hackernoon.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Jekyll seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 195 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Source Wireframe Kit mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Source Wireframe Kit yet. Tracking of Source Wireframe Kit recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Jekyll mentions (195)

  • Building PicoSSG: 'Just Enough Code'
    The static site generator (SSG) landscape is crowded with feature-rich but increasingly complex solutions. As I looked at and used tools like lume, 11ty, lektor, or jekyll, I found myself drowning in configuration options, plugins, and middleware. What started as a simple desire to convert Markdown content into HTML had evolved into learning complex frameworks with steep learning curves. - Source: dev.to / 24 days ago
  • How to create a blog with Quartz, GitHub, and Cloudflare
    If you don't want to use Jekyll as your static site generator for GitHub Pages and you want to have a custom domain for your GitHub Pages. This post is for you! - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Blogging with Obsidian and Jekyll
    Jekyll is a static site generator that transforms Markdown files into a fully functional website. Everything is generated into plain HTML, which makes it simple to deploy on platforms like GitHub Pages. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Create a Blogging Platform With No Backend (Zero Hosting Fee)
    Obviously, there are a dozen choices for generating static websites (efficiently and quickly), from the classic Jekyll to the new Next.js. And you are good to go with any of them as long as your confident with it. I choose 11ty because:. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • It's easy to dev blog
    In your repository settings you need to turn on GitHub Pages to make it pull Jekyll content (that's the magic✨ default GitHub Pages build tool) from your GitHub repository. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Source Wireframe Kit and Jekyll, you can also consider the following products

Contra Wireframe Kit - Open source wireframe kit for design and prototyping 🚀

Hugo - Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.

Platforma - Wireframe library of layouts and UI elements

Ghost - Ghost is a fully open source, adaptable platform for building and running a modern online publication. We power blogs, magazines and journalists from Zappos to Sky News.

Craftwork - A collection of User Interface resources made by Craftwork

WordPress - WordPress is web software you can use to create a beautiful website or blog. We like to say that WordPress is both free and priceless at the same time.