Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Snapt VS Apache Thrift

Compare Snapt VS Apache Thrift and see what are their differences

Snapt logo Snapt

Layer 7 server load balancer

Apache Thrift logo Apache Thrift

An interface definition language and communication protocol for creating cross-language services.
  • Snapt Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-20
  • Apache Thrift Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-07-12

Snapt features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Apache Thrift features and specs

  • Cross-Language Support
    Apache Thrift supports numerous programming languages including Java, Python, C++, Ruby, and more, enabling seamless communication between services written in different languages.
  • Efficient Serialization
    Thrift offers efficient binary serialization which helps in reducing the payload size and improves the communication speed between services.
  • Service Definition Flexibility
    Thrift provides a robust interface definition language (IDL) for defining and generating code for services with strict type checking, fostering strong contract interfaces.
  • Scalability
    Due to its lightweight and efficient serialization mechanisms, Apache Thrift can handle a large number of simultaneous client connections, making it suitable for scalable distributed systems.
  • Versioning Support
    Thrift supports service versioning which helps in evolving APIs without disrupting existing services or clients.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Thrift

  • Steep Learning Curve
    For new users, especially those not familiar with RPC frameworks, learning and understanding Thrift’s IDL and operations can be complex and time-consuming.
  • Documentation and Community Support
    Compared to some alternative technologies, Apache Thrift's documentation and community support can be less robust, which might pose challenges in troubleshooting or seeking guidance.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    Thrift does not support some advanced features like streaming or multiplexing out of the box, which could limit its use in complex systems requiring these functionalities.
  • Infrastructure Overhead
    Integrating Thrift into an existing system might introduce infrastructure overhead both in initial setup and ongoing maintenance, especially when dealing with multiple languages.
  • Protocol Limitations
    While Thrift is highly efficient, its protocol limitations might require additional workarounds for certain data structures or transport mechanisms, complicating development.

Snapt videos

Snapt High 2020

Apache Thrift videos

Apache Thrift

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Snapt and Apache Thrift)
Web Servers
17 17%
83% 83
Web And Application Servers
Network & Admin
100 100%
0% 0
Load Balancer / Reverse Proxy

User comments

Share your experience with using Snapt and Apache Thrift. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Thrift seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 13 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Snapt mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Snapt yet. Tracking of Snapt recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Apache Thrift mentions (13)

  • Show HN: TypeSchema – A JSON specification to describe data models
    I once read a paper about Apache/Meta Thrift [1,2]. It allows you to define data types/interfaces in a definition file and generate code for many programming languages. It was specifically designed for RPCs and microservices. [1]: https://thrift.apache.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Delving Deeper: Enriching Microservices with Golang with CloudWeGo
    While gRPC and Apache Thrift have served the microservice architecture well, CloudWeGo's advanced features and performance metrics set it apart as a promising open source solution for the future. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Reddit System Design/Architecture
    Services in general communicate via Thrift (and in some cases HTTP). Source: about 2 years ago
  • Universal type language!
    Protocol Buffers is the most popular one, but there are many others such as Apache Thrift and my own Typical. Source: about 2 years ago
  • You worked on it? Why is it slow then?
    RPC is not strictly OO, but you can think of RPC calls like method calls. In general it will reflect your interface design and doesn't have to be top-down, although a good project usually will look that way. A good contrast to REST where you use POST/PUT/GET/DELETE pattern on resources where as a procedure call could be a lot more flexible and potentially lighter weight. Think of it like defining methods in code... Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Snapt and Apache Thrift, you can also consider the following products

Haproxy - Reliable, High Performance TCP/HTTP Load Balancer

Docker Hub - Docker Hub is a cloud-based registry service

Google Cloud Load Balancing - Google Cloud Load Balancer enables users to scale their applications on Google Compute Engine.

Eureka - Eureka is a contact center and enterprise performance through speech analytics that immediately reveals insights from automated analysis of communications including calls, chat, email, texts, social media, surveys and more.

Shrink.ly - Shrink.ly is the best way to track and optimize your links with catchy call-to-actions, Script, Video, retargeting pixels, branded links, and powerful analytics.

Traefik - Load Balancer / Reverse Proxy