Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Snap Framework VS Scotty

Compare Snap Framework VS Scotty and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Snap Framework logo Snap Framework

Snap is a simple web development framework for unix systems, written in the Haskell programming language.

Scotty logo Scotty

Scotty is a Haskell framework inspired by Ruby's Sinatra.
  • Snap Framework Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-11-24
  • Scotty Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-29

Snap Framework features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Scotty features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Scotty is designed to be simple and easy to use, making it a great choice for developers who want to quickly create web applications without delving into complex configurations.
  • Lightweight
    Being a minimalist web framework, Scotty has a small footprint, which can lead to faster performance and less memory usage in comparison to heavier frameworks.
  • Type Safety
    As a Haskell framework, Scotty benefits from Haskell’s strong static type system, reducing runtime errors and enhancing code reliability.
  • Integration with Haskell
    Scotty allows Haskell developers to leverage the full power of the Haskell ecosystem, including libraries and tools, for building server-side applications.

Possible disadvantages of Scotty

  • Limited Features
    Scotty provides a minimal set of features, which might not be sufficient for developers looking for an out-of-the-box comprehensive solution for complex applications.
  • Community and Documentation
    Compared to more popular web frameworks, Scotty has a smaller community and less extensive documentation, which might pose challenges when seeking help or examples.
  • Performance Overhead
    While Scotty is suitable for small to medium applications, for high-performance requirements, other highly-optimized frameworks might be more appropriate.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers not familiar with Haskell, there can be a steep learning curve associated with understanding the language concepts needed to effectively use Scotty.

Snap Framework videos

+ Add

Code Review: HasPostgres instance for IO with Snap framework

Scotty videos

No Scotty videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Snap Framework and Scotty)

Snap Framework

Scotty

Web Frameworks
36 36%
Web Frameworks
64% 64
API Tools
0 0%
API Tools
100% 100
Developer Tools
26 26%
Developer Tools
74% 74
Python Web Framework
100 100%
Python Web Framework
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Snap Framework and Scotty. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Scotty should be more popular than Snap Framework. It has been mentiond 13 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Snap Framework mentions (3)

Scotty mentions (13)

  • haskell todo list app (beginner)
    I would suggest checking out scotty for the http server - it uses warp by default, and is very beginner-friendly. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • School of Haskell: Basics
    If you're not a fan of the ruby-on-rails / swiss army knife approach that IHP takes, check out Scotty. Add Lucid for Html rendering, and Selda for Postgres. (There are other options for any of these tools if you prefer) - Scotty (simple web routing) https://hackage.haskell.org/package/scotty. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Use Haskell from Nodejs
    Writing a Haskell webserver (maybe using scotty) and call it from node. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Programming language comparison by reimplementing the same transit data app
    I think ‘worst’ is very subjective here. It certainly does aim to be an all-encompassing ‘framework’ — but this is hardly unusual amongst web libraries (not just for Haskell!), and I feel Yesod gets the job done pretty well. Of course, Haskell has many alternatives if you don’t like Yesod: amongst other libraries, there’s Servant [0], snap [1], scotty [2], and the lower-level wai [3] and warp [4] if you feel the... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Suggestions for "dashboard" graphics libraries?
    I've found htmx and hyperscript talking to scotty to be an easy way to get something like this going while retaining the joys of Haskell on the backend and avoiding the pains of Haskell on the frontend. Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Snap Framework and Scotty, you can also consider the following products

Flask - a microframework for Python based on Werkzeug, Jinja 2 and good intentions.

IHP - The fastest way to buildtype safe web apps 🔥

Haskell From First Principles - A Haskell book for beginners that works for non-programmers and experienced hackers alike.

wai-routes - Type safe routing framework for wai

Node.js - Node.js is a platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications

Yesod - Yesod is a development tool used to create highly efficient websites and web applications from the ground up. Yesod includes almost everything you need to build a website, from templates to routing and execution. Read more about Yesod.

Loading...