Slackware VS NetBSD

Compare Slackware VS NetBSD and see what are their differences

LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

Slackware

Slackware Linux is an advanced Linux operating system, designed with the twin goals of ease of use...

NetBSD

PowerPC, Alpha, SPARC, MIPS, SH3, ARM, amd64, i386, m68k, VAX: Of course it runs NetBSD.

Landing page //
2022-04-20

Landing page //
2023-08-03

Slackware 14 Install & Review

NetBSD videos

+ Add

A FreeBSD User Tries Out....NetBSD 8.0

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Slackware and NetBSD)

NetBSD

Linux Distribution

68 68%

Linux Distribution

32% 32

Linux

57 57%

Linux

43% 43

Operating Systems

63 63%

Operating Systems

37% 37

Linux Distro

100 100%

Linux Distro

0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Slackware and NetBSD. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Slackware and NetBSD

Slackware Reviews

The best Linux distributions (operating systems)

Slackware is the oldest Linux variant still used and maintained today. Installation and configuration is performed via scripts. For users in search of the original Linux experience, Slackware is perhaps the best choice.

Source: www.ionos.com

Best Top 20 Ubuntu Linux Alternatives (Pros and Cons)

Slackware was designed by Patrick Volkerding in 1993. Based on the Softlanding Linux System, Slackware is the oldest Linux distribution still maintained. It strives not to anticipate user situations or preclude user decisions. Unlike most recent Linux distributions, Slackware does not offer graphical installation or automatic package dependency resolution. Slackware is...

Source: cloudinfrastructureservices.co.uk

NetBSD Reviews

We have no reviews of NetBSD yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Slackware might be a bit more popular than NetBSD. We know about 4 links to it since March 2021 and only 3 links to NetBSD. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Slackware mentions (4)

My first Linux installation!
Congrats on making it past the slackware.com Install Help page that seeks to walk you through selection of non-existing boot and root floppy disks. Source: about 2 years ago
Slackware 15 multilib
Using the slackware.uk mirror of Alienbob's content is a LOT faster than going to slackware.com:. Source: about 2 years ago
Slackware 15.0 x86 stable is released
Stay tuned to http://slackware.com and the ##slackware IRC channel on. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
Slackware 15 is on the way
No Date for release candidate, But Patrick Volkerding, on slackware.com. Source: over 2 years ago

NetBSD mentions (3)

Shit they exist
The idea of config files is fine, it's the implementation I don't like. I was using NetBSD recently for my senior project and found it fine to use - all the documentation is in one place (well, two - the manpages and netbsd.org). It's when the documentation is nonexistent and you have to search through a million different websites and forum posts to find the one line you have to change - that's what gets me. Linus... Source: over 1 year ago
Redox OS 0.7.0
This is what most of the existing open source operating systems are and it is much easier to contribute to those or fork one that does most of what you want. If you are aiming at a POSIX system then there is a fair amount of work but you at least then get a huge amount of already written software that you can run (IIUC Redox is aiming for this but written in Rust). A structure like Qubes OS would make it easier... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
Vulnerabilities in billions of Wi-Fi devices let hackers bypass firewalls
It looks like one of the vulnerabilities involves being able to sneak in a rogue ICMPv6 route advertisement, with rogue DNS entries. It also mentions doing this kind of stuff against NetBSD 7.1, but that's a couple of versions old, so I guess they were concerned about all the random managed access points floating around? Source: almost 3 years ago