Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Shoelace.css VS stenciljs

Compare Shoelace.css VS stenciljs and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Shoelace.css logo Shoelace.css

A back to the basics CSS starter kit.

stenciljs logo stenciljs

A toolchain for building reusable, scalable Design Systems.
  • Shoelace.css Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-03
  • stenciljs Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-08

Shoelace.css features and specs

  • Customizable
    Shoelace.css is built using modern Web Components, allowing for easy customization and theming with CSS Variables, ensuring that developers can tailor components to their specific needs.
  • Compatibility
    Shoelace.css is designed to be framework-agnostic and works seamlessly with various JavaScript frameworks like React, Vue, and Angular, providing flexibility in integration.
  • Responsive Design
    The library provides components that are inherently responsive, which helps in building applications that look good on both desktop and mobile devices without additional effort.
  • Accessibility
    Components in Shoelace.css are designed with accessibility in mind, ensuring that applications are usable by people with disabilities and compliant with accessibility standards.
  • Modern Standards
    Being based on Web Components, Shoelace.css makes use of modern web standards, which promotes future-proofing and compatibility with upcoming web technologies.

Possible disadvantages of Shoelace.css

  • Size
    As a component library, Shoelace.css might introduce additional size to your project, which can be a concern for applications where performance and load times are critical.
  • Browser Support
    Since it uses Web Components, Shoelace.css may require polyfills for older browsers that do not fully support these technologies, potentially increasing the complexity of deployments.
  • Learning Curve
    Developers unfamiliar with Web Components or the concept of using framework-agnostic components might need some time to understand and effectively use Shoelace.css.
  • Community and Support
    Compared to more established component libraries, Shoelace.css might have a smaller community and fewer third-party resources, which could make finding support and solutions to issues more challenging.
  • Limited Built-in Functionality
    While highly customizable, Shoelace.css might lack some of the advanced, built-in functionalities found in larger, more comprehensive UI frameworks.

stenciljs features and specs

  • Web standards compliance
    StencilJS generates Web Components that are compliant with the latest web standards, ensuring better future-proofing and compatibility across all browsers.
  • Performance
    StencilJS optimizes components and leverages lazy loading, reducing the initial load time and improving the overall performance of the application.
  • Reusability
    The component-based architecture allows for greater reusability of components across different projects and frameworks, promoting the DRY principle.
  • TypeScript support
    StencilJS is built with TypeScript, providing strong typing, advanced code refactor capabilities, and error detection at compile time.
  • Simple API
    StencilJS offers a simple and intuitive API that reduces the complexity of managing component state and lifecycle, making development more straightforward.
  • Native Frameworks Integration
    Stencil components can be easily integrated into popular frameworks like React, Angular, and Vue, offering great flexibility for developers.
  • Small bundle size
    Due to its efficient compiler and tree-shaking capabilities, StencilJS produces smaller bundle sizes, contributing to faster load times and better performance.

Possible disadvantages of stenciljs

  • Learning curve
    Though StencilJS is simpler than some alternatives, developers accustomed to other frameworks might face a learning curve adapting to its paradigms.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    The StencilJS community and ecosystem are not as extensive as more established frameworks like React or Angular, which could limit the availability of third-party libraries and resources.
  • SEO challenges
    Web Components can pose challenges for SEO, as search engines might not index content rendered inside Shadow DOM correctly without server-side rendering or pre-rendering.
  • Limited Official Documentation
    Although StencilJS has official documentation, it is not as extensive as other frameworks', making it harder to find in-depth information on advanced use cases.
  • Browser compatibility issues
    While Web Components are becoming more widely supported, there might still be inconsistencies or issues with older browsers that need to be managed via polyfills.
  • Complex state management
    StencilJS lacks a built-in state management solution, which means developers may need to integrate third-party libraries or develop custom solutions for complex state handling.

Shoelace.css videos

No Shoelace.css videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

stenciljs videos

Amava coração de frango

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Shoelace.css and stenciljs)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
JavaScript Framework
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Shoelace.css and stenciljs. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, stenciljs should be more popular than Shoelace.css. It has been mentiond 48 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Shoelace.css mentions (25)

  • Show HN: Cs16.css – CSS library based on CS 1.6 UI
    Dashboards, tabs, trees, ... Usually require at least some JavaScript to work properly. For some components, you may be able to use hacks around that. But I would generally not recommend that outside of experimentation. So a pure CSS framework is not going to work. It seems that you are not using a frontend framework like Vue.js. So I would recommend a library using web components for the interactivity. One good... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • React v19 has been released
    Can webcomponents be trivially used with HTMX? Like for example: https://shoelace.style/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Do You Need to SSR Your Web Components?
    I created a simple example with a bunch of Shoelace components where they are being lazy-loaded from a CDN. I loaded the components this way to show worst-case-scenario loading performance. As you can see, it still loads quite quickly. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • You Should Be Shipping a Manifest with Your Web Components
    A recent example of this was when I was helping a team get up and running with Shoelace in a Next.js application. Shoelace provides react wrappers, but they were throwing an error when Next.js tried to server-side render them. Fortunately, Shoelace ships their CEM, so I was able to use it to generate new wrappers that were SSR-safe. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Web Components Are Okay
    I've yet to see this go wrong in practice. The kinds of components that are worth publishing as web components are often large, non-trivial components. Eg media libraries, emoji pickers (like the one made by this article's author), chatbox interfaces, and so on. They are the kinds of things you only have a limited number of on your page. If a component is small and focused in scope, it's likely either written in... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
View more

stenciljs mentions (48)

  • The Caveats of Web Components
    This works but it's not a good idea to create these manually. Since that creates a lot of maintenance and we can run into out of sync issues with the api. To make this less tedious. Both Lit (see here) and Stencil (see here) provide a cli to create these automatically. However the need to create these wrapper components in the first place is additional overhead. If the framework of your choice properly supports... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Integrating Stencil Web Components in Angular Project
    What is Stencil.js? Stencil is an open-source compiler that generates standards-compliant web components. It builds highly performant, reusable components that can be used with any JavaScript framework or library. Created by the Ionic team, Stencil combines the best features of popular frameworks like Angular, React, and Vue, providing a simple and efficient way to build custom elements. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Getting Started with Mitosis: Creating a Cross-Framework Design System
    Although web components offer a modular and reusable approach to UI elements, these challenges can limit their viability. However, if supporting web components is a requirement, you can use Mitosis to generate them from a single source of truth. Mitosis supports Stencil, Lit, and raw web components as outputs. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • We needed to run maintenance queries (SQL) with user input
    I chose Stencil as my tool for building the UI. Stencil is a great framework for creating custom UIs and web apps using TypeScript, which transpiles into native web components with minimal dependencies. Having used Stencil for the past 4-5 years, I found it to be in the sweet spot: powerful enough to build robust web apps from scratch, yet simple enough to avoid overwhelming complexity when creating custom... - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Demystifying Web Components
    Consider adopting something like Lit or Stencil to build Web Components. These frameworks provide standard utilities for working with Web Components and handle everyday tasks such as change detection, server-side rendering, localization, etc. I've personally worked with Lit and find it helpful for preventing common mistakes and pitfalls. Additionally, they provide a series of best practices for authoring... - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Shoelace.css and stenciljs, you can also consider the following products

Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

Svelte - Cybernetically enhanced web apps

DaisyUI - Free UI components plugin for Tailwind CSS

Preact.js - Preact is a fast 3kB alternative to React with the same modern API. Components & Virtual DOM.

CSSGradient.io - As a free css gradient generator tool, this website lets you create a colorful gradient background for your website, blog, or social media profile.

Vue.js - Reactive Components for Modern Web Interfaces