Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Shoelace.css VS Instagram.css

Compare Shoelace.css VS Instagram.css and see what are their differences

Shoelace.css logo Shoelace.css

A back to the basics CSS starter kit.

Instagram.css logo Instagram.css

Complete set of Instagram filters in pure CSS
  • Shoelace.css Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-03
  • Instagram.css Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-02-06

Shoelace.css features and specs

  • Customizable
    Shoelace.css is built using modern Web Components, allowing for easy customization and theming with CSS Variables, ensuring that developers can tailor components to their specific needs.
  • Compatibility
    Shoelace.css is designed to be framework-agnostic and works seamlessly with various JavaScript frameworks like React, Vue, and Angular, providing flexibility in integration.
  • Responsive Design
    The library provides components that are inherently responsive, which helps in building applications that look good on both desktop and mobile devices without additional effort.
  • Accessibility
    Components in Shoelace.css are designed with accessibility in mind, ensuring that applications are usable by people with disabilities and compliant with accessibility standards.
  • Modern Standards
    Being based on Web Components, Shoelace.css makes use of modern web standards, which promotes future-proofing and compatibility with upcoming web technologies.

Possible disadvantages of Shoelace.css

  • Size
    As a component library, Shoelace.css might introduce additional size to your project, which can be a concern for applications where performance and load times are critical.
  • Browser Support
    Since it uses Web Components, Shoelace.css may require polyfills for older browsers that do not fully support these technologies, potentially increasing the complexity of deployments.
  • Learning Curve
    Developers unfamiliar with Web Components or the concept of using framework-agnostic components might need some time to understand and effectively use Shoelace.css.
  • Community and Support
    Compared to more established component libraries, Shoelace.css might have a smaller community and fewer third-party resources, which could make finding support and solutions to issues more challenging.
  • Limited Built-in Functionality
    While highly customizable, Shoelace.css might lack some of the advanced, built-in functionalities found in larger, more comprehensive UI frameworks.

Instagram.css features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Instagram.css is a small library, which ensures that it doesn’t add significant overhead to your website’s load time.
  • Simple Integration
    It is easy to integrate with existing projects due to its single-purpose nature focused on recreating Instagram filters with CSS.
  • No JavaScript Dependency
    The library only utilizes CSS, meaning no additional JavaScript is required, helping maintain fast performance and simplicity.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Instagram.css is designed to be compatible with major browsers, improving user experience by delivering consistent styling.

Possible disadvantages of Instagram.css

  • Limited Functionality
    The library only provides CSS for Instagram-style filters, so it's not as comprehensive as some larger CSS frameworks or libraries that offer broader styling capabilities.
  • Aesthetic Limitation
    Since the library is specifically tailored to mimic Instagram filters, customization is limited if you want more unique or diverse filter effects.
  • Dependency on CSS Filters
    Relying on CSS filters might limit the quality or consistency of effects compared to more sophisticated image processing tools.
  • Not Actively Maintained
    If the library is not actively maintained, it might face challenges adapting to future CSS standards or browser updates.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Shoelace.css and Instagram.css)
Developer Tools
55 55%
45% 45
Design Tools
45 45%
55% 55
Gradient Generator
100 100%
0% 0
Social Media Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Shoelace.css and Instagram.css. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Shoelace.css seems to be a lot more popular than Instagram.css. While we know about 25 links to Shoelace.css, we've tracked only 1 mention of Instagram.css. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Shoelace.css mentions (25)

  • Show HN: Cs16.css – CSS library based on CS 1.6 UI
    Dashboards, tabs, trees, ... Usually require at least some JavaScript to work properly. For some components, you may be able to use hacks around that. But I would generally not recommend that outside of experimentation. So a pure CSS framework is not going to work. It seems that you are not using a frontend framework like Vue.js. So I would recommend a library using web components for the interactivity. One good... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • React v19 has been released
    Can webcomponents be trivially used with HTMX? Like for example: https://shoelace.style/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Do You Need to SSR Your Web Components?
    I created a simple example with a bunch of Shoelace components where they are being lazy-loaded from a CDN. I loaded the components this way to show worst-case-scenario loading performance. As you can see, it still loads quite quickly. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • You Should Be Shipping a Manifest with Your Web Components
    A recent example of this was when I was helping a team get up and running with Shoelace in a Next.js application. Shoelace provides react wrappers, but they were throwing an error when Next.js tried to server-side render them. Fortunately, Shoelace ships their CEM, so I was able to use it to generate new wrappers that were SSR-safe. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Web Components Are Okay
    I've yet to see this go wrong in practice. The kinds of components that are worth publishing as web components are often large, non-trivial components. Eg media libraries, emoji pickers (like the one made by this article's author), chatbox interfaces, and so on. They are the kinds of things you only have a limited number of on your page. If a component is small and focused in scope, it's likely either written in... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
View more

Instagram.css mentions (1)

  • Instagram is threatening legal action against Pixelfed
    Yeah, I heard it was about the filter names, but previously had no idea what those filter names actually were. If they're common, obvious names like "blur" and "enhance", then I doubt Instagram would have a case, but if they're really the same as Instagram's, and Instagram's filters are indeed those on https://picturepan2.github.io/instagram.css/ , and those names originated with Instagram, then Pixelfed needs to... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Shoelace.css and Instagram.css, you can also consider the following products

Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

DaisyUI - Free UI components plugin for Tailwind CSS

CSSGradient.io - As a free css gradient generator tool, this website lets you create a colorful gradient background for your website, blog, or social media profile.

Windy - Wind and weather forecast for kiters, surfers, pilots, sailors and anyone else.

Unused CSS - Easily find and remove unused CSS rules

Face Filters on Instagram Stories - Add augmented reality face filters on Instagram Stories