Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
b

Shoelace.css VS bttn.css

Compare Shoelace.css VS bttn.css and see what are their differences

Kimp
Kimp is an unlimited design company, specializing in graphic design (including print and digital designs, custom illustrations, landing page designs and email designs) and video design. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Shoelace.css logo Shoelace.css

A back to the basics CSS starter kit.

bttn.css logo bttn.css

Awesome buttons for awesome projects!
  • Shoelace.css Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-03
  • bttn.css Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-29

Shoelace.css features and specs

  • Customizable
    Shoelace.css is built using modern Web Components, allowing for easy customization and theming with CSS Variables, ensuring that developers can tailor components to their specific needs.
  • Compatibility
    Shoelace.css is designed to be framework-agnostic and works seamlessly with various JavaScript frameworks like React, Vue, and Angular, providing flexibility in integration.
  • Responsive Design
    The library provides components that are inherently responsive, which helps in building applications that look good on both desktop and mobile devices without additional effort.
  • Accessibility
    Components in Shoelace.css are designed with accessibility in mind, ensuring that applications are usable by people with disabilities and compliant with accessibility standards.
  • Modern Standards
    Being based on Web Components, Shoelace.css makes use of modern web standards, which promotes future-proofing and compatibility with upcoming web technologies.

Possible disadvantages of Shoelace.css

  • Size
    As a component library, Shoelace.css might introduce additional size to your project, which can be a concern for applications where performance and load times are critical.
  • Browser Support
    Since it uses Web Components, Shoelace.css may require polyfills for older browsers that do not fully support these technologies, potentially increasing the complexity of deployments.
  • Learning Curve
    Developers unfamiliar with Web Components or the concept of using framework-agnostic components might need some time to understand and effectively use Shoelace.css.
  • Community and Support
    Compared to more established component libraries, Shoelace.css might have a smaller community and fewer third-party resources, which could make finding support and solutions to issues more challenging.
  • Limited Built-in Functionality
    While highly customizable, Shoelace.css might lack some of the advanced, built-in functionalities found in larger, more comprehensive UI frameworks.

bttn.css features and specs

  • Simplicity
    bttn.css provides a simple way to add visually appealing buttons to web projects without requiring deep knowledge of CSS.
  • Lightweight
    The library is minimal in size, reducing load times and keeping projects fast and responsive.
  • Variety
    It offers a range of pre-designed buttons, allowing for easy customization and experimentation with styles.
  • Ease of Integration
    bttn.css can be easily integrated into existing projects, allowing developers to enhance UI with minimal changes to their codebase.

Possible disadvantages of bttn.css

  • Limited Customization
    While it offers a variety of styles, the scope for customization is limited compared to writing custom CSS or using more comprehensive libraries.
  • Dependency
    Relying on an external library, however minimal, can introduce dependency risks such as lack of future updates or changes in URL hosting.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    bttn.css focuses on button styling and doesn't provide advanced features that more comprehensive frameworks might offer, such as accessibility options.
  • Community and Support
    Being a niche library, it might have a smaller community, leading to fewer resources, tutorials, and support compared to larger CSS frameworks.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Shoelace.css and bttn.css)

Shoelace.css

bttn.css

Developer Tools
64 64%
Developer Tools
36% 36
Design Tools
57 57%
Design Tools
43% 43
Gradient Generator
100 100%
Gradient Generator
0% 0
CSS Framework
0 0%
CSS Framework
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Shoelace.css and bttn.css. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Shoelace.css seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 25 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Shoelace.css mentions (25)

  • Show HN: Cs16.css – CSS library based on CS 1.6 UI
    Dashboards, tabs, trees, ... Usually require at least some JavaScript to work properly. For some components, you may be able to use hacks around that. But I would generally not recommend that outside of experimentation. So a pure CSS framework is not going to work. It seems that you are not using a frontend framework like Vue.js. So I would recommend a library using web components for the interactivity. One good... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • React v19 has been released
    Can webcomponents be trivially used with HTMX? Like for example: https://shoelace.style/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Do You Need to SSR Your Web Components?
    I created a simple example with a bunch of Shoelace components where they are being lazy-loaded from a CDN. I loaded the components this way to show worst-case-scenario loading performance. As you can see, it still loads quite quickly. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • You Should Be Shipping a Manifest with Your Web Components
    A recent example of this was when I was helping a team get up and running with Shoelace in a Next.js application. Shoelace provides react wrappers, but they were throwing an error when Next.js tried to server-side render them. Fortunately, Shoelace ships their CEM, so I was able to use it to generate new wrappers that were SSR-safe. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Web Components Are Okay
    I've yet to see this go wrong in practice. The kinds of components that are worth publishing as web components are often large, non-trivial components. Eg media libraries, emoji pickers (like the one made by this article's author), chatbox interfaces, and so on. They are the kinds of things you only have a limited number of on your page. If a component is small and focused in scope, it's likely either written in... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
View more

bttn.css mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of bttn.css yet. Tracking of bttn.css recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Shoelace.css and bttn.css, you can also consider the following products

Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

DaisyUI - Free UI components plugin for Tailwind CSS

Animista - Create beautiful CSS animations in your browser

CSSGradient.io - As a free css gradient generator tool, this website lets you create a colorful gradient background for your website, blog, or social media profile.

CSSRooster - Bot that writes CSS classes for HTML with deep learning

Unused CSS - Easily find and remove unused CSS rules

Loading...