Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Shield UI Charts VS PixiJS

Compare Shield UI Charts VS PixiJS and see what are their differences

Shield UI Charts logo Shield UI Charts

JavaScript Chart Types - Our HTML5 and JavaScript chart is a fast, feature-rich data visualization control. It offers over 23 different chart types and flexible API for additional customization.

PixiJS logo PixiJS

Fast and flexible WebGL-based HTML5 game and app development library.
  • Shield UI Charts Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-01
  • PixiJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-25

Shield UI Charts features and specs

  • Wide Range of Chart Types
    Shield UI Charts offers a comprehensive selection of chart types including bar, line, area, pie, and more, allowing for versatile data visualization options.
  • Interactive Features
    The charts are interactive, providing features such as tooltips, zooming, and panning, which enhance user engagement and data exploration.
  • Customizability
    Users can customize chart appearances extensively, such as colors, labels, and legends, to match their specific needs and branding requirements.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Shield UI Charts are designed to work consistently across different web browsers, ensuring a smooth experience regardless of user's choice of browser.
  • Ease of Integration
    The library integrates smoothly into various platforms and frameworks, which simplifies the process of embedding charts into web applications.

Possible disadvantages of Shield UI Charts

  • Cost
    Shield UI Charts are not free for all uses, requiring a license for full access, which might not be suitable for projects with limited budgets.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite comprehensive documentation, new users might face a learning curve when trying to make full use of the advanced features and customization options.
  • Performance with Large Data Sets
    The performance might degrade when handling very large data sets, leading to slower rendering times compared to some other high-performance charting libraries.
  • Dependency on JavaScript
    As a JavaScript-based library, it may not perform optimally in environments where JavaScript is disabled or limited, restricting its usability.

PixiJS features and specs

  • Performance
    PixiJS provides high performance through the use of WebGL, offering fast rendering capabilities that can handle complex scenes and animations efficiently.
  • Cross-Platform
    PixiJS is compatible with various platforms, including desktops, tablets, and mobile devices, ensuring a consistent experience across different environments.
  • Rich Features
    It comes with a variety of built-in features such as sprites, filters, masks, and support for different shapes and textures, which makes it powerful for creating interactive graphics.
  • Ease of Use
    The library offers a user-friendly API and extensive documentation, making it easy to learn and integrate into projects, even for developers who are new to WebGL.
  • Community Support
    PixiJS has an active community and a wealth of resources including forums, tutorials, and GitHub repositories, which help users troubleshoot issues and improve their projects.

Possible disadvantages of PixiJS

  • Size
    PixiJS can be relatively large in terms of file size, which may affect load times and performance, particularly for users with slow internet connections or limited bandwidth.
  • Browser Compatibility
    Since PixiJS relies heavily on WebGL, it may face compatibility issues with older browsers or devices that do not support advanced WebGL features.
  • Complexity
    While powerful, PixiJS can become complex when building more advanced applications, requiring a deep understanding of 3D graphics and WebGL concepts.
  • Limited 3D Support
    PixiJS is primarily a 2D rendering engine and lacks comprehensive support for 3D graphics, which might be a limitation for projects requiring 3D rendering.
  • Memory Management
    Handling memory efficiently can be challenging, especially in complex scenes with many textures and sprites, leading to potential memory leaks or performance degradation.

Shield UI Charts videos

No Shield UI Charts videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

PixiJS videos

PixiJS Part 3: Renderer, Ticker, & Stage

More videos:

  • Review - Learn PixiJS in 20 Minutes

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Shield UI Charts and PixiJS)
Javascript UI Libraries
22 22%
78% 78
Charting Libraries
100 100%
0% 0
Flowcharts
0 0%
100% 100
Utilities
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Shield UI Charts and PixiJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, PixiJS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 72 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Shield UI Charts mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Shield UI Charts yet. Tracking of Shield UI Charts recommendations started around Mar 2021.

PixiJS mentions (72)

  • Trying to Replace the DOM with Canvas — And Failing
    To improve performance, another team built a POC replacing standard DOM elements with a canvas managed by a library called pixi.js. The idea was to boost rendering speed. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Building an AI Powered Camera for David Bowie
    We can now decide how we want to display the data.image result back to our user. You can simply throw it up in an tag or generate a reveal video on the fly like I’ve done using Pixi.JS and MediaRecorder. Perhaps a topic for another dev blog. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Tattooing The Black Keys Fans Using MediaDevices and PixiJS
    For this application, we gain access to the user’s camera using MediaDevices and then place it onto a PixiJS canvas as a video sprite. Then, we load the tattoo as an additional sprite and give it a bit of opacity and blending to bleed it into the user’s skin. Simple controls are added to allow the user to rotate, scale, and position the tattoo for the perfect inking. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Chapter 1: Boring SVG Manipulation
    And canvas felt almost natural and invoked heavy nostalgia from the first time I touched keyboard and wrote primitive program to draw a house out of lines utilizing Basic. Later on I had a chance to broaden my expertise, when I was doing my hobby game project with Pixi and small bits and pieces on FindLabs pages. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • JSON Canvas – An open file format for infinite canvas data
    The canvas in Obsidian is as the whole app very well made. I wondered what they are using as well. My guess is https://www.xyflow.com/, which is for drawing nodes. More general purpose would be http://fabricjs.com/. Or very low level https://pixijs.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Shield UI Charts and PixiJS, you can also consider the following products

Pixi.js - Fast lightweight 2D library that works across all devices

Three.js - A JavaScript 3D library which makes WebGL simpler.

D3.js - D3.js is a JavaScript library for manipulating documents based on data. D3 helps you bring data to life using HTML, SVG, and CSS.

Phaser - Desktop and Mobile HTML5 game framework. A fast, free and fun open source framework for Canvas and WebGL powered browser games.

Raphael - Raphael.js is an Object Oriented drawing library. It is good at making in-depth diagrams with complex interactions.

Paper.js - Open source vector graphics scripting framework that runs on top of the HTML5 Canvas.