Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Sharingbuttons.io VS Media.net

Compare Sharingbuttons.io VS Media.net and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Sharingbuttons.io logo Sharingbuttons.io

Quickly generate social sharing buttons with a tiny performance footprint.

Media.net logo Media.net

Yahoo! Bing Network Contextual Ads powered by Media. net gives you instantaneous access to one of the world's largest marketplaces for advertisers. People also askWhat is Media Net?What is Medianet Cisco?
  • Sharingbuttons.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-06-17
  • Media.net Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-07

Sharingbuttons.io features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Sharingbuttons.io provides a straightforward interface to create social media sharing buttons, making it easy for users without much technical knowledge to generate and implement them on their websites.
  • Customization
    The service allows users to customize the appearance of the sharing buttons to match their website's design, such as choosing different shapes, sizes, and icon styles.
  • No JavaScript
    The buttons are generated without the need for JavaScript, potentially enhancing website performance and load times, as well as reducing privacy concerns linked to third-party script injection.
  • Privacy
    Since Sharingbuttons.io does not track user data, it offers a privacy-friendly solution for websites wishing to offer social sharing options without compromising user privacy.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source means users can access the source code, allowing for greater control and the possibility to contribute to or modify the project to better suit specific needs.

Possible disadvantages of Sharingbuttons.io

  • Limited Features
    The tool focuses on simplicity, which means it lacks some advanced features offered by other sharing button providers, such as detailed analytics or integrated follow buttons.
  • Manual Updates
    As it requires users to manually implement and update the HTML and CSS code, it might not be the best option for dynamic websites or those needing frequent updates.
  • No Support for Legacy Browsers
    The buttons may not be fully compatible with older browsers that do not support modern HTML and CSS standards, potentially limiting accessibility for some users.
  • Basic Aesthetic
    While customizable, the aesthetic options are relatively basic, which might not satisfy users looking for more elaborate or modern button designs.
  • No User Interface Feedback
    Because the buttons are designed without JavaScript, they don't provide interactive feedback (like share counts or pop-ups) that some users might expect from social sharing buttons.

Media.net features and specs

  • High-Quality Advertisers
    Media.net has partnerships with major advertisers like Yahoo and Bing, which can result in higher-quality, relevant ads that may yield better revenue.
  • Customization Options
    Allows for significant customization of ad units so they can blend seamlessly with the website’s design, enhancing user experience.
  • Contextual Ads
    Uses a contextual advertising approach, displaying ads relevant to the content on your site, thereby increasing the likelihood of user engagement.
  • Global Reach
    Media.net has a strong global presence, providing access to an international pool of advertisers which benefits websites with diverse audiences.
  • Dedicated Support
    Offers excellent customer support with dedicated account managers to help optimize ad performance and revenue.
  • Diversified Revenue
    Provides an alternative revenue source that can complement other ad networks, diversifying your income streams.

Possible disadvantages of Media.net

  • Approval Process
    The approval process can be stringent, making it difficult for smaller or newer websites to get accepted.
  • Payment Threshold
    Has a relatively high payment threshold, which can be a challenge for smaller publishers to reach before they can withdraw earnings.
  • Limited Ad Formats
    Offers fewer ad format options compared to some other networks, potentially limiting the ways publishers can monetize their content.
  • Lower Fill Rates
    Some users report lower fill rates compared to other ad networks, meaning not all available ad space may be utilized.
  • Dependency on Quality
    The earnings can be highly dependent on the quality and type of content, as their system relies heavily on contextual relevance.
  • Time to Optimize
    The platform may require some time and effort to fully optimize ad placements and maximize revenue, which could be a drawback for those looking for quick results.

Analysis of Media.net

Overall verdict

  • Media.net is generally considered a good platform for publishers looking to monetize their website through contextual advertising. Its competitive CPM (cost per thousand impressions) rates and reliable payment structure make it a popular choice. However, the platform may work best for content-rich websites with substantial traffic from English-speaking countries.

Why this product is good

  • Media.net is a leading ad network that specializes in contextual advertising and offers high-quality ads that are often competitive with industry giants like Google AdSense. It provides a comprehensive suite of tools for optimizing ad performance and is known for its strong inventory of advertisers through partnerships with Yahoo and Bing. The platform offers various ad formats, including display and native ads, which can enhance user experience and increase engagement for publishers.

Recommended for

  • Website owners with significant traffic from United States, Canada, and other English-speaking countries.
  • Content-rich websites looking to leverage contextual advertising.
  • Publishers seeking an alternative to Google AdSense for additional or diversified ad revenue streams.

Sharingbuttons.io videos

No Sharingbuttons.io videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Media.net videos

How to Monetize Your Site with Ads | Media.net Review

More videos:

  • Review - Media.net Earning Proof & Review | Is Media.net good Adsense Alternative?

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Sharingbuttons.io and Media.net)
Social Media Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Advertising
0 0%
100% 100
Social Media Marketing
100 100%
0% 0
Ad Networks
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Sharingbuttons.io and Media.net. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Sharingbuttons.io and Media.net

Sharingbuttons.io Reviews

We have no reviews of Sharingbuttons.io yet.
Be the first one to post

Media.net Reviews

Top 11 Google AdSense alternatives for 2022
It is difficult to say which ad network is the best alternative to AdSense as many factors influence a website’s ad revenue. These include the geographic location of their traffic, the vertical, amount of traffic, the device used, advertiser competition, and much more. It is best to test different ad networks, as mentioned on our list such as Real Content Network, Trion,...
21 Best AdSense Alternatives to Consider for Your Website in 2022
Currently I have Adsense (for about a year) and my RPM hovers between $1.50 – $1.80. I tried Media.net and it was way worse around $.50. I applied for Monumetric 3 months ago and still have not heard from them. I’ve emailed several times and not heard back.
Source: kinsta.com
Top 25 Google Adsense Alternatives For Your Website/Blog in 2022
Another major benefit of Media.net is that it gives you access to the searches from the Yahoo! and Bing network. Also, the platform gives you access to a network of clients, so you can boost your ad revenue and take advantage of a rich search market.
Source: www.izooto.com
Top 7 Best Ezoic Alternatives For More Ad Revenue
Media.net is one of the better alternatives to Ezoic as it is the primary ad provider for Bing and Yahoo, two popular search engines. Media.net has employees staffed in key areas over the world. Among their clientele are top online publications like Reuters, Forbes, and Kiplinger.
Source: webaroo.com.au
10 Best Google AdSense Alternatives – Make Money from Your Blog
For platforms with more than 50,000 readers, your best bet will be Mediavine or RevContent. You can even combine two networks to boost your earnings. Media.net and RevenueHits seem to be a good combination based on user reviews. Relying on a single solution is risky as users of Google AdSense have experienced.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Media.net seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 23 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Sharingbuttons.io mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Sharingbuttons.io yet. Tracking of Sharingbuttons.io recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Media.net mentions (23)

  • AdSense closed my account, what are my options now?
    I've heard good things of media.net or if you're interested in monetizing with Native you can try Taboola or RevContent. They have some minimum requirements of traffic. So you will need to check with them if you meet them. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Group/Subreddit for Placement OA discussion
    Is there any fb group or subreddit where I can clarify my doubts about OA questions of placements and internships , just know I gave media.net OA and and I just need to the intuition for one of the questions. Thanks for the same. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Ad revenue down 50% despite same traffic
    Content is 100% clean. All my own work. Our partners did have a falling out with media.net so perhaps thats the cause. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Ads in react apps
    My understanding of Google adsense is you need lots of content for them to generate ads and it looks like some others are similar and require lots of views before you can set up the ads (Media.net, Adversal). I am not really into creating content like blogs but more interactive and functional apps, so I don't think these products would work. Source: about 2 years ago
  • HOW MUCH IS THAT TRUE KYA TIER 3 WALE STRUGLE HI KARTE RHE JAYEGE KYA
    Agree with the screenshot. Tier matters in initial years. In my college avg salary is 4 LPA. Max is 8 LPA (media.net). Mine is 7.5 (Capg). Source: about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Sharingbuttons.io and Media.net, you can also consider the following products

AddThis - AddThis free website tools include share buttons, targeting tools and content recommendations help you get more likes, shares and followers and keep them coming back.

AdSense - Earn money with website monetization from Google AdSense. We'll optimize your ad sizes to give them more chance to be seen and clicked.

Buffer - Buffer makes it super easy to share any page you're reading. Keep your Buffer topped up and we automagically share them for you through the day.

Infolinks - Discover what Infolinks smart ads can do for you

Sharexy - The web world has grown dramatically since it first came about.

Ezoic - Improve & test ads, layouts, & content using artificial intelligence to increase website ad revenue & UX metrics. Google Adsense & Google Publishing Partner