Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

ShareDB VS GUN

Compare ShareDB VS GUN and see what are their differences

ShareDB logo ShareDB

Realtime database backend based on Operational Transformation (OT)

GUN logo GUN

Self-hosted Firebase.
  • ShareDB Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-02
  • GUN Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-30

ShareDB features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

GUN features and specs

  • Decentralized
    GUN is a decentralized database, which means it does not rely on a central server. This can help improve reliability and resilience against single points of failure.
  • Real-time synchronization
    GUN provides real-time synchronization of data across different clients. This is highly beneficial for applications that need instant updates and live data.
  • Offline-first
    GUN supports offline-first functionality, allowing users to interact with the database even when they are not connected to the internet. Changes are synchronized once the connection is restored.
  • Scalability
    Being decentralized, GUN can theoretically scale indefinitely since there is no central server to become a bottleneck.
  • Lightweight
    GUN is designed to be lightweight, making it ideal for applications where resources are limited, such as mobile or IoT devices.
  • Easy to integrate
    GUN can be easily integrated with other technologies and databases due to its flexible design.

Possible disadvantages of GUN

  • Complexity
    Implementing a decentralized system can be more complex than a traditional centralized database, requiring developers to handle issues like data consistency and conflict resolution.
  • Maturity
    GUN is still relatively new compared to more established databases, which means it may lack some advanced features and robust community support.
  • Learning curve
    Due to its unique design and architecture, developers may face a steep learning curve when first starting with GUN.
  • Performance
    In some cases, the performance of GUN may not match that of traditional centralized databases, especially when dealing with large datasets or requiring complex queries.
  • Limited ecosystem
    Compared to more mature technologies, GUN has a smaller ecosystem of tools, libraries, and community resources.

ShareDB videos

No ShareDB videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

GUN videos

Weekly Used Gun Review Ep. 13

More videos:

  • Review - Best Gun For Your 1st Gun & Ones To Stay Away From 2020 Edition
  • Review - Forcing Hickok to review Guns he's uncomfortable with...

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to ShareDB and GUN)
Developer Tools
15 15%
85% 85
Databases
26 26%
74% 74
NoSQL Databases
27 27%
73% 73
JavaScript
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using ShareDB and GUN. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare ShareDB and GUN

ShareDB Reviews

We have no reviews of ShareDB yet.
Be the first one to post

GUN Reviews

Top 10 Alternatives To Firebase
Gun helps in managing error-free backend services. Website app development is easier and the resources focus on the minute fragments of app development.
Source: www.redbytes.in

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ShareDB and GUN, you can also consider the following products

RxDB - A fast, offline-first, reactive Database for JavaScript Applications

Firebase - Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications for mobile and web.

Yjs - A CRDT framework with a powerful abstraction of shared data, Shared data types for building collaborative software

Supabase - An open source Firebase alternative

SignalDB - SignalDB is a reactive, local-first JavaScript database designed for modern web applications. It combines signal-based reactivity with powerful local data management and real-time synchronization capabilities.

Redis - Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.