Shadow.do VS Transcribe

Shadow.do Reviews

1. markymark

   | HR Consultant at Adecco | 4 months ago
   bot-free meeting assistant

   I like how this software is able to be taken to live meetings as well. For someone who is old fashioned as I am and have been having more offline meetings, it helps to have a tool that supports this. Also because there is no bot it doesn't get in the way of communication which was my main issue with all the AI meeting tools.

   🏁 Competitors: Fireflies.ai for Meetings, Otter, Transcribe

   👍 Pros:    Bot free|Improves your productivity|Multi-person meetings|Zoom meeting sync|Free

   👎 Cons:    Ui can be improved|Currently no microsoft|Easy user onboarding

Transcribe Reviews

Shadow.do mentions (0)

Transcribe mentions (3)

• Upping My Accessibility Skills

  📋 This means I should have prepared a transcript of the audio I've included above. Have you ever typed up your own transcript? It takes a good amount of effort and time, and a helpful transcription app, that my clients would probably not pay for. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago

• Episode Transcripts?

  To start, I have a $20/ yr "manual" transcription license for Transcribe by Wreally. Once I saw that other folks were interested in transcripts too, I set up an automatic transcription for the first episode - it tends to work alright, but also needs some manual revising and editing after it finishes processing. Source: about 3 years ago

• Who's listening? Growing privacy concerns around transcription services

  This is the main reason we still have a local-only mode in our transcription web app [1]. We play the audio/video file directly from the user’s computer, and we use local storage to store typed text in users’ computers. This way no transcription data leaves users’ computers. We’ve been working on it for over a decade and we did add machine transcription recently, but I still find a surprising number of users use... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago