Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Scrutinizer VS CodeClimate

Compare Scrutinizer VS CodeClimate and see what are their differences

The page you are looking for does not exist

Scrutinizer logo Scrutinizer

Powerful tools for measuring and improving code quality for open- and closed-source development projects.

CodeClimate logo CodeClimate

Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.
  • Scrutinizer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-12
  • CodeClimate Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-04

Scrutinizer features and specs

  • Comprehensive Analysis
    Scrutinizer provides an in-depth analysis of your code, offering valuable insights into code quality, maintainability, and potential bugs.
  • Multi-language Support
    It supports multiple programming languages, making it versatile for projects developed in different coding environments.
  • Integrations
    Scrutinizer integrates with popular version control systems like GitHub and Bitbucket, enhancing the CI/CD pipeline.
  • Customizable Configuration
    Users can define custom configurations to tailor the analysis process to their specific needs.
  • Scalability
    Designed to scale with the size of the projects, making it suitable for both small and large teams.

Possible disadvantages of Scrutinizer

  • Pricing
    While offering a free tier, more advanced features require a subscription, which might be expensive for smaller teams or individual developers.
  • Learning Curve
    The interface and configuration settings might be complex for new users, requiring a learning period to fully leverage its capabilities.
  • Performance
    In some cases, analysis times can be slow, especially for larger codebases, impacting continuous integration workflows.
  • Limited Free Tier
    The free plan comes with limitations that may not be sufficient for larger projects or more demanding needs.
  • Dependency on Third-party Tools
    Heavy reliance on third-party tools means any issues with these tools can indirectly affect the performance and functionality of Scrutinizer.

CodeClimate features and specs

  • Automated Code Review
    CodeClimate automatically analyzes code for quality, security, and performance issues, helping developers maintain high standards without manual intervention.
  • Extensive Integrations
    CodeClimate offers integrations with popular tools like GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and CI/CD pipelines, making it easy to integrate into existing workflows.
  • Detailed Reporting
    Provides comprehensive reports that highlight code issues, test coverage, duplication, and complexity, enabling developers to quickly identify and address problems.
  • Team Collaboration
    Facilitates better team collaboration by offering features such as pull request reviews and comments, which help teams discuss and resolve code issues collaboratively.
  • Customizable Quality Gates
    Allows teams to set custom quality gates and thresholds, ensuring that only code meeting specific quality standards is allowed to pass.

Possible disadvantages of CodeClimate

  • Cost
    CodeClimate can be expensive for small teams or individual developers, especially if advanced features are required.
  • False Positives
    Automated reviews can sometimes generate false positives, flagging code as problematic when it isn’t, which can be time-consuming to sift through.
  • Learning Curve
    New users might experience a learning curve when configuring and optimizing the tool to fit their specific needs and workflows.
  • Performance Overhead
    Running extensive code analyses can add performance overhead to the development lifecycle, potentially slowing down build and review processes.
  • Limited Offline Access
    As a cloud-based tool, CodeClimate requires internet access for most operations, limiting its functionality in offline or restricted network environments.

Scrutinizer videos

Scrutinizer NetFlow Analyzer: Example Uses Part (2)

More videos:

  • Review - Scrutinizer NetFlow & sFlow Analyzer

CodeClimate videos

SaaS Chat: SaaSTV, the Affordable Care Act website, CodeClimate for code reviews

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Scrutinizer and CodeClimate)
Code Coverage
19 19%
81% 81
Code Quality
19 19%
81% 81
Code Analysis
16 16%
84% 84
Development
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Scrutinizer and CodeClimate. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Scrutinizer and CodeClimate

Scrutinizer Reviews

We have no reviews of Scrutinizer yet.
Be the first one to post

CodeClimate Reviews

11 Interesting Tools for Auditing and Managing Code Quality
Code Climate is an analytics tool that is extremely useful for an organization that emphasizes quality. Code Climate offers two different products:
Source: geekflare.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CodeClimate should be more popular than Scrutinizer. It has been mentiond 14 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Scrutinizer mentions (2)

CodeClimate mentions (14)

  • Most Effective Approaches for Debugging Applications
    Vishal Shah, Sr. Technical Consultant at WPWeb Infotech, emphasizes this approach, stating, “The first step is to identify the bug by replicating the issue. Understanding the exact conditions that trigger the problem is crucial.” Shah’s workflow includes rigorous testing—unit, integration, and regression tests—followed by peer reviews and staging deployments. Data from GitLab’s 2024 DevSecOps Report supports this,... - Source: dev.to / 14 days ago
  • Beyond Bugs: The Hidden Impact of Code Quality (Part 2) 🌟
    - code climate It’s like Sonarqube but doesn’t offer detailed reports and doesn’t support all languages, you can see it from here Https://codeclimate.com/. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Build metrics and budgets with git-metrics
    For open-source projects, many SaaS platforms offer free tiers for monitoring. For tracking code coverage, you can use Codecov or Coveralls. For tracking complexity, CodeClimate is a good option. These platforms integrate well with GitHub repositories. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • free-for.dev
    Codeclimate.com — Automated code review, free for Open Source and unlimited organisation-owned private repos (up to 4 collaborators). Also free for students and institutions. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • How To Use Code Climate To Improve Software Quality
    Want to know how to enforce allowing only high-quality software into production? Check out this post on how to use CodeClimate can help you do just that! #DevOps #SoftwareDeveloper #softwaredevelopment #SoftwareEngineering #webdevelopment #codequality. Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Scrutinizer and CodeClimate, you can also consider the following products

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

SensioLabs Insight - PHP Project Quality Done Right.

ESLint - The fully pluggable JavaScript code quality tool

Source Insight - Source Insight is a programming editor & code browser with built-in live analysis for C/C++, C#, Java, and more; helping you understand large projects.

Coveralls - Coveralls is a code coverage history and tracking tool that tests coverage reports and statistics for engineering teams.