Scotty VS Snap Framework

I would suggest checking out scotty for the http server - it uses warp by default, and is very beginner-friendly. Source: 11 months ago

If you're not a fan of the ruby-on-rails / swiss army knife approach that IHP takes, check out Scotty. Add Lucid for Html rendering, and Selda for Postgres. (There are other options for any of these tools if you prefer) - Scotty (simple web routing) https://hackage.haskell.org/package/scotty. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

Writing a Haskell webserver (maybe using scotty) and call it from node. Source: over 1 year ago

I think ‘worst’ is very subjective here. It certainly does aim to be an all-encompassing ‘framework’ — but this is hardly unusual amongst web libraries (not just for Haskell!), and I feel Yesod gets the job done pretty well. Of course, Haskell has many alternatives if you don’t like Yesod: amongst other libraries, there’s Servant [0], snap [1], scotty [2], and the lower-level wai [3] and warp [4] if you feel the... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

I've found htmx and hyperscript talking to scotty to be an easy way to get something like this going while retaining the joys of Haskell on the backend and avoiding the pains of Haskell on the frontend. Source: over 1 year ago

I also looked into Snap (http://snapframework.com/) and Yesod (https://www.yesodweb.com/) for Haskell. I didn't really get anywhere with those though because I had build issues with dependencies and was in a bit of a hurry so I put them off for later. Source: almost 2 years ago

As with most languages, there are several good web frameworks. See for instance snap. Source: almost 2 years ago

Snap (http://snapframework.com/) and Scotty (https://hackage.haskell.org/package/scotty) are both projects that can fit this description. Source: almost 2 years ago