Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Scoop VS Webpack

Compare Scoop VS Webpack and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Scoop logo Scoop

A command-line installer for Windows

Webpack logo Webpack

Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.
  • Scoop Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-02
  • Webpack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-13

Scoop features and specs

  • Simple Installation
    Scoop allows for simple installation of software packages using easy-to-remember commands, making it accessible even to users with limited technical knowledge.
  • No Admin Rights Required
    Scoop doesn't require administrative privileges for installation, making it convenient for users in restricted environments.
  • No Path Pollution
    Packages are installed in a structured directory and don't pollute the system PATH, reducing the risk of environmental conflicts.
  • Dependencies Management
    Scoop manages dependencies automatically, ensuring that all required libraries and dependencies are installed along with the main package.
  • Portable Packages
    Many Scoop packages are portable, allowing users to install, use, and remove them without leaving traces behind on the system.
  • Customizable
    Scoop allows users to create and maintain their own buckets (collections of app manifests), facilitating the management of custom or private software.

Possible disadvantages of Scoop

  • Limited GUI Integration
    Scoop is primarily command-line based and lacks a graphical user interface, which may be a disadvantage for users who prefer visual interaction.
  • Windows-Only
    Scoop is designed specifically for Windows, limiting its applicability for users who work across multiple operating systems.
  • Smaller Repository
    Compared to package managers like Chocolatey, Scoop has a smaller repository, potentially limiting the availability of certain software through its platform.
  • Dependency on PowerShell
    Scoop relies on PowerShell, which means it cannot be used on systems where PowerShell is restricted or unavailable.
  • Learning Curve for Non-Technical Users
    While straightforward, Scoop still requires users to be comfortable with command-line operations, which might present a learning curve for non-technical users.

Webpack features and specs

  • Modular Bundling
    Webpack efficiently bundles all your modules (JavaScript, CSS, images, etc.) into manageable chunks, minimizing HTTP requests and enhancing load performance.
  • Code Splitting
    It allows splitting your codebase into 'chunks' which can be loaded on demand. This leads to faster initial page loads as only necessary chunks are loaded initially.
  • Hot Module Replacement (HMR)
    HMR allows you to update modules without needing a full refresh. This improves development speed and efficiency as live changes are instantly reflected in the application.
  • Advanced Configuration
    Webpack is highly configurable, accommodating various needs from simple setups to complex, custom configurations, making it versatile for different projects.
  • Strong Plugin Ecosystem
    There is a rich ecosystem of plugins available to extend Webpack's capabilities, such as minification, asset management, and more.
  • Tree Shaking
    Webpack supports tree shaking, a method to eliminate dead code from your bundle, resulting in more efficient, smaller output files.
  • Dependency Management
    It handles dependencies among modules effectively, automatically managing module load order and avoiding conflicts.

Possible disadvantages of Webpack

  • Complex Configuration
    Its extensive configuration options can be overwhelming, particularly for beginners, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Build Time
    Complex configurations and large projects can result in slower build times, impacting development speed.
  • Documentation Issues
    Despite improvements, there are instances where Webpack's documentation might lack clarity, making it harder to find solutions for specific configurations.
  • Overhead for Simple Projects
    For small and simple projects, Webpack might be overkill, adding unnecessary complexity and setup time.
  • Compatibility Issues
    Occasionally, Webpack updates can lead to breaking changes, which may require significant adjustments to your configuration and codebase.

Analysis of Scoop

Overall verdict

  • Scoop is considered a good tool for developers and power users who are comfortable using the command line and wish to have efficient control over their software installations on Windows. It provides ease of use similar to package managers available on other operating systems, like Homebrew on macOS.

Why this product is good

  • Scoop is a command-line installer for Windows designed to simplify the process of managing software packages. It offers a simple approach to installation by downloading and unpacking software in a well-defined directory structure, which minimizes common Windows issues like dependency hell and admin access requirements. Scoop is particularly effective because it focuses on user space installation, avoiding the need for administrator rights, and it integrates easily with PowerShell and Windows Command Prompt.

Recommended for

    Scoop is highly recommended for developers, system administrators, and advanced Windows users who regularly work with a variety of software tools and require an efficient, lightweight means of managing these tools. It is particularly beneficial for users who prefer using the command line for software management and wish to automate installations and updates.

Scoop videos

+ Add

5 Ice Cream Scoops Compared!

More videos:

  • Review - Hamilton Beach Coffee Maker "The Scoop" Exclusive Review
  • Review - The Scoop: Lateral trainer review
  • Review - SCOOP Review
  • Review - Game Scoop! 698: Spoiler-Free God of War Ragnarok Opinions

Webpack videos

+ Add

Learn Webpack - Full Tutorial for Beginners

More videos:

  • Review - Core Concepts of Webpack
  • Review - Learn Webpack Pt. 6: Cache Busting and Plugins

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Scoop and Webpack)

Scoop

Webpack

Windows Tools
100 100%
Windows Tools
0% 0
Web Application Bundler
0 0%
Web Application Bundler
100% 100
Package Manager
100 100%
Package Manager
0% 0
JS Build Tools
0 0%
JS Build Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Scoop and Webpack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Scoop and Webpack

Scoop Reviews

5 Best Windows package manager to use via command line
Furthermore, we don’t need admin rights to use Scoop, I mean no evaluated Powershell or Command prompt to install packages as we do in Chocolatey. However, when it comes to the range of packages available in its repository it couldn’t compete with Choco, moreover, the gist of using Scoop is different. Most of the users use it to get mostly command-line tools such as MongoDB,...
Source: www.how2shout.com
6 Best Windows Package Manager to Auto-Update Apps (2020)
The problem with package management is that the cmdlets are complex. This brings Scoop in the picture. Scoop is a small open-source utility for PowerShell. You need to have a minimum of version 3.0. So, the commands to install software is as simple as scoop install firefox. To install Scoop, you just need to type the following in the Powershell.
Source: techwiser.com

Webpack Reviews

Rollup v. Webpack v. Parcel
Tool Prod Build Time One Prod Build Time Two Prod Build Time Three Prod Build Time Avg Parcel 738.509 s 35.364 s 35.592 s 269.82 avg s Rollup 0.712 s 0.665 s 0.714 s 0.697 avg s Webpack 3.636 s 3.805 s 4.305 s 3.915 avg s
Source: x-team.com
If you’ve ever configured Webpack, Parcel will blow your mind!
document.body.className = document.body.className.replace(/(^|\s)is-noJs(\s|$)/, "$1is-js$2")HomepageHomepageJavascriptBecome a memberSign inGet startedIf you’ve ever configured Webpack, Parcel will blow your mind!And how to hit the ground running with Parcel.Ibrahim ButtBlockedUnblockFollowFollowingMar 16, 2018Click here to share this article on LinkedIn »Zero...
Source: medium.com
First impressions with Parcel JS
From first impressions and experience, my take currently would be as follows. Webpack is generally going to be more flexible. It also places a bit more power in the developers hands to make bundling happen exactly as desired. That isn’t to say you shouldn’t use Parcel though. Where Parcel excels is the fact you don’t configure it. You will still need to configure plugins for...
Source: codeburst.io
Parcel vs webpack - Jakob Lind
Webpack is the stable choice. You will not get fired for picking webpack. But you don’t get as much stuff for free such as optimized bundles, and code splitting.
Source: blog.jakoblind.no

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Webpack should be more popular than Scoop. It has been mentiond 244 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Scoop mentions (162)

  • Is Using Linux for Web Development Actually Necessary? Short answer: No.
    Package managers – With tools like Scoop or Chocolatey, installing dev tools on Windows feels almost like using apt or brew. - Source: dev.to / 10 days ago
  • Configuring LazyVim and Python on Windows with WSL
    You can use Scoop package manager to install various packages. If you want to skip this step, you can install WezTerm manually. Open a PowerShell terminal and type. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Microsoft to force Windows 11 24H2 on Home and Pro users
    I don’t know about winget, but you may be able to install the portable build of Terminal via scoop: https://scoop.sh/#/apps?q=Terminal&id=269082ead77af63e0e77c98c80bef9429504ac23. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Create Your Custom WSL from any Linux Distribution (Part-1)
    While the ArchWSL and Fedora WSL at MS Store may seem great at first before installing, these distros have often showed compatibility issues and sometimes very weird bugs; even conflicts with scoop or chocolatey apps. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Git Bash Is My Preferred Windows Shell
    My favourite shell environment for windows thus far is combining Git For Windows with scoop[1]. A simple "scoop install git" will get the environment installed, and give you a bash shell and full access to all sorts of windows-native utilities from scoop. Some would say I'd be better off with msys2 or cygwin, but the former is meant more as a development environment and lacks misc utilities, and the latter has... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
View more

Webpack mentions (244)

  • JavaScript is so redundant
    Why are there so many JavaScript build tools? Gulp, Grunt, Webpack, Laravel Mix, Rollup.js, and now Vite. And these are just the ones that I've worked with. Haven't we solved this problem? And why build a new tool? Why not improve existing tools? - Source: dev.to / about 2 hours ago
  • Dark Souls CRUD Arena - The Prisoner Approach
    To then serve to the browser. If I was using something like Vite or Webpack I would have gotten this handling for free. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • You Don’t Know JS Yet: My Weekly Journey Through JavaScript Mastery
    The JS code gets transpiled by tools like Babel, then bundled (often by Webpack) into a single or few files (like bundle.js). This optimizes the website to load faster, as the browser can fetch everything from one file instead of multiple. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Webpack 5: The Next Generation Module Bundler
    Remember that Webpack is highly configurable, and this article only scratches the surface of what's possible. Be sure to check the official Webpack documentation for more detailed information and advanced configurations. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Discover the power of microfrontends: A revolution in frontend development
    With Webpack 5, a new feature has helped microfrontends proliferate: Module Federation. Module Federation allows JavaScript code to be loaded — synchronously or asynchronously — at runtime. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Scoop and Webpack, you can also consider the following products

Chocolatey - The sane way to manage software on Windows.

rollup.js - Rollup is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into a larger piece such as application.

Ninite - Ninite is the easiest way to install software.

Parcel - Blazing fast, zero configuration web application bundler

Just Install - just-install - The stupid package installer for Windows.

Babel - Babel is a compiler for writing next generation JavaScript.

Loading...