Sauce Labs Reviews

The Acid3 Test Reviews

Sauce Labs mentions (14)

• 🛑 Stop resizing your browser: improve testing for responsiveness

  Platforms like Browserstack or SauceLabs offer virtual instances of real devices and browsers for manual and end-to-end testing. Caveat: subscriptions cost money and are on a per-seat basis. - Source: dev.to / 26 days ago

• React Native Testing Options Overview

  Appium is an open-source test automation framework. You can use it with native, hybrid, and mobile web apps. It drives iOS and Android apps using the WebDriver protocol. Appium is sponsored by Sauce Labs and a community of open source developers. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago

• Top HeadSpin Alternatives for Comprehensive Testing

  2. SauceLabs SauceLabs offers a cloud-based platform for automated and manual testing of web and mobile applications across various browsers, operating systems, and devices. It supports continuous integration and delivery workflows, making it easier for teams to get immediate feedback on the impact of code changes. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Emulator images for Samsung devices?

  Your best option are probably real device testing sites like e.g. https://saucelabs.com/. Source: about 1 year ago

• Simulate your website across many devices all in the same browser tab! Proof of concept for a micro saas I'm building in public :)

  There are service like this one. https://saucelabs.com/ is one. There used to be browser plugins to simulate a different browser. But as we found out over time: simulates devices aren't true to the real thing, so often you'll just simply run into problems in the simulated device ce that don't occur on the real device, or vice versa. Source: about 1 year ago

The Acid3 Test mentions (5)

• Shadow: New browser engine made almost in JavaScript

  Https://shadow.goose.icu/?http://acid3.acidtests.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

• Should there be a standard prompt for showcasing models?

  During the browser wars, web developers created “Acid Tests” to see how well a browser supported various style sheet and markup conventions. When the acid tests became popular, there were accusations that browser engineers were manipulating their rendering engines to pass those tests. For instance, some cascading style sheet attribute would pass the test, but fail to work as expected under normal use on a web page. Source: over 1 year ago

• Everyone should use Firefox

  I am sure that both firefox and chromium-based browsers will pass most of something like ACID3 test. But at this stage standards have nothing to do with reality. Standards define perhaps 10% of the code you are writing and interpretation of the rest 90% of the code is up to the browsers. Source: almost 2 years ago

• SerenityOS Browser now passes the Acid3 test

  The old version (http://acid3.acidtests.org/) will reach 97/100 on modern compliant browsers. There is a newer version (https://wpt.live/acid/acid3/test.html) which incorporates the changes made to the specs in the meantime, so modern browsers will reach 100/100 on this one again. The test was carried out against this version, as you can see in the address bar in the screenshot. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

• "You don't deserve to have a job!" Debatable, but you're still wrong.

  Different PRESENTATION of content on mobile is good. Different content on mobile is the definition of r/assholedesign. It does not matter if the http user agent is a "good" one or not, it should just work. There is a specification, numerous accessibility guidelines, plenty of tests and benchmarks. This isn't 1999 anymore... 🤷‍♂️. Source: over 2 years ago