Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Satis VS Docker Registry 2.0

Compare Satis VS Docker Registry 2.0 and see what are their differences

Satis logo Satis

Satis is a simple static Composer repository generator

Docker Registry 2.0 logo Docker Registry 2.0

Barebones but complete registry implementation for self-hosting.
  • Satis Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-11
  • Docker Registry 2.0 Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-18

Satis features and specs

  • Custom Repository Creation
    Satis allows you to create your own Composer repositories, which can host private or customized packages. This is useful for internal company projects or any situation where you want more control over the packages you use.
  • Simple Setup
    Satis is relatively straightforward to set up and requires minimal configuration. This simplicity makes it accessible for teams without a dedicated DevOps department.
  • Lightweight
    Being a simple PHP static file generator, Satis is lightweight and doesn’t require a large resource overhead to operate, making it efficient for smaller projects or limited server environments.
  • Secure Private Packages
    Satis allows for the secure hosting of private packages, ensuring that internal or proprietary code is not exposed to the public and can be shared safely within an organization.
  • Composer Compatibility
    Satis is fully compatible with Composer, ensuring that developers can seamlessly integrate it into their existing workflow without requiring significant changes or adaptations.

Possible disadvantages of Satis

  • Limited Feature Set
    Satis is primarily a static file generator and does not offer advanced features such as package search, browsing, or user interfaces that more robust solutions might provide.
  • Manual Updates
    Packages hosted on a Satis repository do not update automatically; it requires manual intervention to update the package listings whenever changes are made to the source packages.
  • No Dependency Management
    Satis itself does not handle dependency management; it relies on Composer for that functionality. Satis is only for repository management, which might not suit all project needs.
  • Limited Scalability
    While lightweight, Satis might not be ideal for large-scale operations or gigantic repositories with many dependencies and packages, as it doesn't inherently support scaling or load balancing mechanisms.
  • Lack of User Management
    Satis does not offer built-in user management functionality, which means that any access restrictions or permissions need to be handled externally, potentially complicating integration with other systems.

Docker Registry 2.0 features and specs

  • Versioning Support
    Docker Registry 2.0 supports the use of tags and versioning, making it easier to manage and deploy different versions of container images.
  • Access Control
    It offers robust access control features, allowing administrators to manage permissions regarding who can push and pull images.
  • Scalable Architecture
    Designed to be scalable, Docker Registry 2.0 can handle a large number of image requests and is suitable for enterprise-level deployments.
  • Customizable Storage Options
    Supports various storage backends including filesystems like Amazon S3, providing flexibility in managing storage needs.
  • API Compatibility
    Provides a well-documented API that facilitates easy management and integration with other tools and CI/CD pipelines.

Possible disadvantages of Docker Registry 2.0

  • Complex Setup
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex, particularly for users unfamiliar with container and registry technologies.
  • Security Concerns
    While it has access control features, without proper configuration, there can be security vulnerabilities, particularly in public registry setups.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running a Docker Registry can be resource-intensive, requiring sufficient computational resources to operate efficiently.
  • Maintenance Overhead
    Regular maintenance is required to ensure optimal performance and security, which can be a burden for smaller teams.
  • Limited Visualization Tools
    Lacks built-in visualization tools for monitoring image usage and storage statistics, which can make management more challenging.

Satis videos

2002 Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6 Initiale Road Test & Review - Matty's Cars

More videos:

  • Review - Renault Vel Satis 3.0 dCi (2006) - Eine echte Staatskarosse? | Test & Review
  • Review - Renault Vel Satis Road Test - it's HUUUUGE!

Docker Registry 2.0 videos

No Docker Registry 2.0 videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Satis and Docker Registry 2.0)
Package Manager
100 100%
0% 0
Sysadmin
0 0%
100% 100
Software Development
53 53%
47% 47
Code Collaboration
20 20%
80% 80

User comments

Share your experience with using Satis and Docker Registry 2.0. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Docker Registry 2.0 should be more popular than Satis. It has been mentiond 21 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Satis mentions (5)

  • Need help with Installing Enlightn Pro
    Note: Satis is a local repo repository — the pro code is likely not on github. They set up their own system to handle these repositories outside of github/packagist. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Private Packagist - has anyone used and can tell me if it might fit in my scenario?
    If you want/need to self-host this internally, you can look at satis to create and self-host a repository. Since you need to add the packages manually, your security team can vet the code before adding it. There is a post on gitconnected on how to set this up: https://levelup.gitconnected.com/how-to-host-your-own-private-packagist-for-free-or-extremely-cheap-faf44eca3647. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Need a secured way to be able to use Composer
    We have a private Satis instance. Our ITSec team reviews all packages before we add them to Satis. Packagist.com is available for us but the CI-CD servers can reach only the private Satis. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • My own CMS/Tool - what is the best way to go about the usage in different projects?
    My team and I use Satis to accomplish that. It's hosted on our servers and we can easily release new versions. Dependabot can even upgrade the dependencies if new ones are detected. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Do you use a private composer registry ? (Why / Why Not)
    Composer supports multiple types of custom respositories, so you can host your own repository (with something like Satis), pay for a packagist.com private repository or even use a VCS repository to fetch packages directly from your private GIT repos. Source: over 3 years ago

Docker Registry 2.0 mentions (21)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Satis and Docker Registry 2.0, you can also consider the following products

Sonatype Nexus Repository - The world's only repository manager with FREE support for popular formats.

ProGet - ProGet is a repository manager that allows you to host your own personal or enterprise-wide package...

Private Packagist - Composer package archive as a service for PHP

Artifactory - The world’s most advanced repository manager.

Gitlab Container Registry - Built on open source software, GitLab Container Registry isn't just a standalone registry; it's completely integrated with GitLab.

Cloudsmith - Cloudsmith is the preferred software platform for securely storing and sharing packages and containers. We have distributed millions of packages for innovative companies around the world.