Sanebox VS Rspamd

I see no specific issue with sanebox.com, however it appears that they are only offering a service you can do on your own. Honestly, do you really get that much SPAM? Source: over 1 year ago

Spamassassin or rspamd or ASSP. All very good. Spamassassin just works, but you need to feed it a good cohort of spam and ham (about 1000 messages each). Most people only send it the spam which will then bias it quite a bit and not have it classify spam as spam unless it's the worst of the bunch. Spamassassin is a filter for your mail server. Rspamd is the same idea. ASSP is highly configurable and a proxy. Source: 10 months ago

Https://rspamd.com/ is what we use on our mail servers blocks around 60% of incoming emails some get thu but not a lot. Source: about 1 year ago

Definitely. I think Gmail spam filtering has just gone haywire with way too much input, ChatGPT style sales pitches, and too much clutter. At Skiff (https://skiff.com/mail), we use RSPAMD (https://rspamd.com/), an open-source spam filtering framework. It's not as sophisticated, but it is highly explainable and works consistently. I much prefer this + inbox rules to anything else. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

When I installed Rspamd with on OpenBSD / OpenSMTPD the other day, DKIMProxy out (dkimproxy_out daemon), which had been got via OpenBSD Ports package system, was used to add DKIM signatures to mails in order to improve security on emails. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago

Well, Rspamd includes web interface to monitor its performance. I combined it with relayd. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago