Sandpack by CodeSandbox VS Rundown Creator

For us at CodeSandbox, we stand by it as a company but also as individuals. We released our browser editor, Sandpack, and parts of Nodebox as open source and we want to give back any time we can! - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

As for the portal itself then I was thinking of making another post that explains how the site is built. But sandpack by codebox is the standard solution for live code execution. Source: about 1 year ago

Https://sandpack.codesandbox.io/ Sandpack is what they're using. Go check out the docs, and I'm sure there's plenty of tutorials if you search it up. Source: over 1 year ago

Hi, Can anyone please let me know what this type of animation is called? Is it a type of Parallax effect or something else? Thanks. Reference: https://sandpack.codesandbox.io/ (Top section). Source: about 2 years ago

Then I remembered that CodeSandbox released their Sandpack component toolkit that you Can use to create live code editing blocks. Since that's an npm package that you install, I figured it will definitely be More performant because its code will be compiled, optimized and shipped along with the page. So I decided to swap out The old embedded iframe with the new Sandpack component. And the results were surprizing:. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

I agree that shoflo is too expensive. But its far superior to rundowncreator.com in a few ways. Source: almost 3 years ago

What is up with Broadcast software providers? Is a reskin of a google doc worth 900$ a year for ONE SEAT? Is an iPhone app worth 400$ a month for unlimited licenses (only one at a time active user though). What the hell is wrong with them? Why is there such a huge disparity? On one hand you have Shoflo charging a grand a year for a seat for every individual feature on their webapp, then rundowncreator.com... Source: almost 3 years ago