Samba VS Git Large File Storage

Compare Samba VS Git Large File Storage and see what are their differences

Bunny.net

BunnyCDN is a simple and powerful CDN, offering lightning fast performance for a fraction of the cost with free SSL, Brotli, HTTP/2 and 100% Pay As You Go pricing. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

Samba

Samba serves as an open source alternative to the traditional domain controller offered by Microsoft.

Git Large File Storage

Git Large File Storage (LFS) replaces large files such as audio samples, videos, datasets, and graphics with text pointers.

Landing page //
2018-09-29

Landing page //
2023-04-13

Samba OG 3 Month Review | Uncomfortable?

Git Large File Storage videos

+ Add

#GitHub_Git Large File Storage (LFS) Files Upload to GitHub By Git GUI Here

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Samba and Git Large File Storage)

Git Large File Storage

Cloud Computing

100 100%

Cloud Computing

0% 0

Git

0 0%

Git

100% 100

Identity And Access Management

100 100%

Identity And Access Management

0% 0

Code Collaboration

0 0%

Code Collaboration

100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Samba and Git Large File Storage. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Git Large File Storage seems to be a lot more popular than Samba. While we know about 100 links to Git Large File Storage, we've tracked only 1 mention of Samba. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Samba mentions (1)

Samba 4.16 broken?
Well, it's the first Samba release in the ports since 4.13, and it isn't marked as broken. I'm not sure why you'd look on the samba.org site to see if the FreeBSD port has defects, or why you'd give me a link link to the Samba wiki for 4.13 when I'm very clearly asking about 4.16. Source: over 1 year ago

Git Large File Storage mentions (100)

Git-annex: manage large files in Git without storing the contents in Git
What's the difference between this and Git-LFS? https://git-lfs.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
Aho – a Git implementation in Awk
It doesn't, since Git's data model has to be changed to content-defined chunks to solve the issue. You should look at git-lfs[1] instead. [1] https://git-lfs.com. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Launch HN: Diversion (YC S22) – Cloud-Native Git Alternative
Congrats on the HN launch. How does this improve or expand or blow git-lfs[1] out of the water because if I needed large blob file support it's what I would use instead. It offers pointers to the big files to the hosted git instead of pushing around the binaries itself -- though I am speculating since I've not used it myself just read about it online. [1] https://git-lfs.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
What and Why, Git LFS?
While sleuthing around, I came across an old podcast episode from ShopTalk Show about blogging and later tips on utilizing Git LFS as an option to sync and managed timestamp changes to large image files, videos, audio, and design files such as Photoshop files. According to the official Git LFS documentation, you can continue to commit changes as usual on your end and what Git LFS does it creates little pointer... - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
Please, please, PLEASE use source control! (Plus, the only git commands I ever use)
Git LFS is pretty straightforward, but there are a few caveats:. Source: 12 months ago