Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Runscope VS Step CI

Compare Runscope VS Step CI and see what are their differences

Runscope logo Runscope

Log, monitor and measure your API usage to solve API problems fast.

Step CI logo Step CI

API Testing and Monitoring made simple
  • Runscope Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-05
  • Step CI Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-13

Runscope features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Runscope provides an intuitive and user-friendly interface that makes it accessible even for users with limited technical expertise. Its dashboard and tools are designed for easy setup and minimal learning curve.
  • Comprehensive API Testing
    Runscope offers a wide range of testing tools, allowing users to conduct thorough evaluations of API performance, reliability, and functionality. It supports REST and SOAP protocols, among others.
  • Automated Testing
    Users can automate their API tests through scheduled tests and continuous integration (CI) capabilities, leading to more efficient testing workflows and consistent monitoring over time.
  • Detailed Reporting
    Runscope provides in-depth test results and reports, helping users quickly identify, diagnose, and solve issues. This includes options for transaction logs, test step results, and historical analysis.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Runscope integrates well with various development and monitoring tools, such as Slack, JIRA, Jenkins, and GitHub, enhancing its functionality within existing workflows.
  • Team Collaboration
    Supports multiple users and provides features for team collaboration, including shared test environments, role-based access control, and group notifications.

Possible disadvantages of Runscope

  • Cost
    Runscope can be expensive, particularly for smaller teams or individual developers, due to its subscription-based pricing model. The more advanced features are reserved for higher-priced tiers.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While the basic interface is user-friendly, mastering all the advanced features and integrations may require a steeper learning curve and more technical knowledge.
  • Dependency on Internet Connection
    As a cloud-based tool, Runscope requires a stable internet connection to function effectively. Any disruptions can hinder testing and monitoring processes.
  • Limited Offline Support
    Runscope lacks robust offline support, making it less ideal for developing and testing in environments without reliable internet connectivity.
  • Custom Automation Scripts
    Creating and managing complex, custom automation scripts can be challenging, requiring more advanced programming skills and understanding of Runscope’s scripting environment.
  • Limited Storage for Test Results
    The data retention period for test results may be limited based on the subscription tier, which can be a constraint for long-term projects requiring historical data analysis.

Step CI features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Step CI provides an intuitive user interface that makes it accessible for users of varying technical expertise. This ease of use helps teams adopt it without a steep learning curve.
  • Integration
    Step CI integrates seamlessly with a variety of third-party tools and services, allowing teams to create flexible and powerful CI pipelines without extensive reconfiguration of their existing environment.
  • Scalability
    The platform is designed to handle projects of different sizes, making it suitable for both small startups and large enterprises looking to scale their continuous integration processes.
  • Customization
    Step CI offers plenty of customization options, enabling teams to tailor their CI/CD pipelines according to specific project requirements and workflows.

Possible disadvantages of Step CI

  • Pricing
    Pricing for Step CI may be higher compared to other CI/CD tools, especially for startups or smaller teams with limited budgets.
  • Limited Documentation
    Some users may find the available documentation insufficient or lacking in detail, which can lead to slower implementation and troubleshooting times.
  • Feature Gaps
    While Step CI offers a robust set of features, there may be certain advanced functionalities that other competitors provide, which Step CI may lack, potentially leading to constraints for some users.

Analysis of Runscope

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Runscope is generally considered good for testing and monitoring APIs.

Why this product is good

  • Runscope provides a user-friendly interface which simplifies API testing processes.
  • It supports multiple environments and integrates well with continuous integration and deployment pipelines.
  • Runscope offers detailed analytics and logging features that help in identifying and troubleshooting issues effectively.
  • The platform provides real-time alerts and notifications which are crucial for maintaining optimal API performance.

Recommended for

  • Developers and QA engineers looking for reliable API testing tools.
  • Organizations that need to ensure the performance and reliability of their APIs.
  • Teams that require seamless integration of API testing into their DevOps pipeline.
  • Users who value detailed reporting and monitoring features for API responses and uptime.

Runscope videos

Runscope Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Creating Runscope Tests from CA API Management

Step CI videos

No Step CI videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Runscope and Step CI)
API Tools
83 83%
17% 17
Developer Tools
72 72%
28% 28
API
0 0%
100% 100
APIs
81 81%
19% 19

User comments

Share your experience with using Runscope and Step CI. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Step CI seems to be a lot more popular than Runscope. While we know about 11 links to Step CI, we've tracked only 1 mention of Runscope. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Runscope mentions (1)

  • Show HN: Hurl.it Is Back
    Hurl.it was originally created by Chris Wanstrath and Leah Culver for the 2009 Rails Rumble. Hurl.it was acquired and maintained by https://twilio.com for awhile. Hurl.it was acquired and relaunched by https://runscope.com in 2013. Hurl.it was acquired and relaunched by https://pipedream.com in 2021. - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago

Step CI mentions (11)

  • Why Feedback Loops Matter in API Development
    CI/CD testing: As mentioned earlier, if you have fast preview deployments Of your API hooked up to your PRs, you can use a tool like StepCI to run integration and end-to-end tests as a part of your development workflow. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Show HN: Simplifying Back end Testing with qapir.io
    How is it different from Step CI? https://stepci.com. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • End-to-End API Testing Guide and Best Practices
    Top Tools: Use Postman for a visual approach to E2E testing, StepCI for CI/CD integration, and Playwright for all-in-one testing. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • TypeScript NPM Packages Done Right
    The problem is that you can import commonjs modules in ESM but not the other way around. For stepci (https://stepci.com) we have chosen to not support ESM for this very reason. We want that the library “just works” for all our users. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Show HN: Open-source Postman alternative with type safety
    Hopscotch is not a Postman fork as far as I know. You can also do request chaining with Step CI (https://stepci.com) and Hurl (https://hurl.dev). - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Runscope and Step CI, you can also consider the following products

Postman - The Collaboration Platform for API Development

restclient.el - HTTP REST client tool for emacs

HttpMaster - HttpMaster is a professional software tool for testing and debugging HTTP applications, primarily aimed at REST API applications and web services.

Hoppscotch - Open source API development ecosystem

Restfox.dev - Browser based HTTP client inspired by Insomnia and Postman

API Fortress - API performance, accuracy, and uptime testing. Without code.