Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Runscope VS Postman Workspaces

Compare Runscope VS Postman Workspaces and see what are their differences

Runscope logo Runscope

Log, monitor and measure your API usage to solve API problems fast.

Postman Workspaces logo Postman Workspaces

Organize and speed up API development work
  • Runscope Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-05
  • Postman Workspaces Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-23

Runscope features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Runscope provides an intuitive and user-friendly interface that makes it accessible even for users with limited technical expertise. Its dashboard and tools are designed for easy setup and minimal learning curve.
  • Comprehensive API Testing
    Runscope offers a wide range of testing tools, allowing users to conduct thorough evaluations of API performance, reliability, and functionality. It supports REST and SOAP protocols, among others.
  • Automated Testing
    Users can automate their API tests through scheduled tests and continuous integration (CI) capabilities, leading to more efficient testing workflows and consistent monitoring over time.
  • Detailed Reporting
    Runscope provides in-depth test results and reports, helping users quickly identify, diagnose, and solve issues. This includes options for transaction logs, test step results, and historical analysis.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Runscope integrates well with various development and monitoring tools, such as Slack, JIRA, Jenkins, and GitHub, enhancing its functionality within existing workflows.
  • Team Collaboration
    Supports multiple users and provides features for team collaboration, including shared test environments, role-based access control, and group notifications.

Possible disadvantages of Runscope

  • Cost
    Runscope can be expensive, particularly for smaller teams or individual developers, due to its subscription-based pricing model. The more advanced features are reserved for higher-priced tiers.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While the basic interface is user-friendly, mastering all the advanced features and integrations may require a steeper learning curve and more technical knowledge.
  • Dependency on Internet Connection
    As a cloud-based tool, Runscope requires a stable internet connection to function effectively. Any disruptions can hinder testing and monitoring processes.
  • Limited Offline Support
    Runscope lacks robust offline support, making it less ideal for developing and testing in environments without reliable internet connectivity.
  • Custom Automation Scripts
    Creating and managing complex, custom automation scripts can be challenging, requiring more advanced programming skills and understanding of Runscope’s scripting environment.
  • Limited Storage for Test Results
    The data retention period for test results may be limited based on the subscription tier, which can be a constraint for long-term projects requiring historical data analysis.

Postman Workspaces features and specs

  • Collaboration
    Postman Workspaces allow teams to collaborate in real-time, making it easy for multiple users to access and work on projects simultaneously.
  • Organized Management
    Workspaces help in organizing APIs, collections, environments, and other components effectively, which makes navigation and management easier.
  • Access Control
    Workspaces offer access control features that let you define who can view or edit the resources, ensuring secure and structured collaboration.
  • Customization
    You can create different types of workspaces such as team and public workspaces, allowing flexibility in how you manage and share APIs.
  • Integration
    They integrate smoothly with other Postman features and third-party tools, such as version control systems, enhancing overall project productivity.

Possible disadvantages of Postman Workspaces

  • Complexity
    For new users or small teams, the range of functionality might be overwhelming and can introduce unnecessary complexity.
  • Cost
    Advanced collaboration features in Postman Workspaces are typically available with a paid plan, which could be a financial concern for smaller teams or startups.
  • Learning Curve
    Understanding how to effectively use all the features offered within workspaces can require a significant investment in training and upskilling.
  • Performance
    With large teams or complex projects, performance can become an issue, as handling many requests within a workspace might slow down operations.
  • Dependency on Internet
    Postman Workspaces rely on internet connectivity, which can be a limitation in environments with inconsistent network access.

Analysis of Runscope

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Runscope is generally considered good for testing and monitoring APIs.

Why this product is good

  • Runscope provides a user-friendly interface which simplifies API testing processes.
  • It supports multiple environments and integrates well with continuous integration and deployment pipelines.
  • Runscope offers detailed analytics and logging features that help in identifying and troubleshooting issues effectively.
  • The platform provides real-time alerts and notifications which are crucial for maintaining optimal API performance.

Recommended for

  • Developers and QA engineers looking for reliable API testing tools.
  • Organizations that need to ensure the performance and reliability of their APIs.
  • Teams that require seamless integration of API testing into their DevOps pipeline.
  • Users who value detailed reporting and monitoring features for API responses and uptime.

Runscope videos

Runscope Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Creating Runscope Tests from CA API Management

Postman Workspaces videos

What are Postman Workspaces and Environments? Introduction to Postman

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Runscope and Postman Workspaces)
API Tools
70 70%
30% 30
Developer Tools
65 65%
35% 35
APIs
64 64%
36% 36
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Runscope and Postman Workspaces. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Runscope seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Runscope mentions (1)

  • Show HN: Hurl.it Is Back
    Hurl.it was originally created by Chris Wanstrath and Leah Culver for the 2009 Rails Rumble. Hurl.it was acquired and maintained by https://twilio.com for awhile. Hurl.it was acquired and relaunched by https://runscope.com in 2013. Hurl.it was acquired and relaunched by https://pipedream.com in 2021. - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago

Postman Workspaces mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Postman Workspaces yet. Tracking of Postman Workspaces recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Runscope and Postman Workspaces, you can also consider the following products

Postman - The Collaboration Platform for API Development

HttpMaster - HttpMaster is a professional software tool for testing and debugging HTTP applications, primarily aimed at REST API applications and web services.

TablePlus for Windows - A native GUI tool for MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQL Server & more

Hoppscotch - Open source API development ecosystem

Postman for Mac (Beta) - Build, test, and document your APIs faster

API Fortress - API performance, accuracy, and uptime testing. Without code.