Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Runscope VS Aspen - API Testing for macOS

Compare Runscope VS Aspen - API Testing for macOS and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Runscope logo Runscope

Log, monitor and measure your API usage to solve API problems fast.

Aspen - API Testing for macOS logo Aspen - API Testing for macOS

Blazing-fast API tester with AI helper & no login required!
  • Runscope Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-05
Not present

Runscope features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Runscope provides an intuitive and user-friendly interface that makes it accessible even for users with limited technical expertise. Its dashboard and tools are designed for easy setup and minimal learning curve.
  • Comprehensive API Testing
    Runscope offers a wide range of testing tools, allowing users to conduct thorough evaluations of API performance, reliability, and functionality. It supports REST and SOAP protocols, among others.
  • Automated Testing
    Users can automate their API tests through scheduled tests and continuous integration (CI) capabilities, leading to more efficient testing workflows and consistent monitoring over time.
  • Detailed Reporting
    Runscope provides in-depth test results and reports, helping users quickly identify, diagnose, and solve issues. This includes options for transaction logs, test step results, and historical analysis.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Runscope integrates well with various development and monitoring tools, such as Slack, JIRA, Jenkins, and GitHub, enhancing its functionality within existing workflows.
  • Team Collaboration
    Supports multiple users and provides features for team collaboration, including shared test environments, role-based access control, and group notifications.

Possible disadvantages of Runscope

  • Cost
    Runscope can be expensive, particularly for smaller teams or individual developers, due to its subscription-based pricing model. The more advanced features are reserved for higher-priced tiers.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While the basic interface is user-friendly, mastering all the advanced features and integrations may require a steeper learning curve and more technical knowledge.
  • Dependency on Internet Connection
    As a cloud-based tool, Runscope requires a stable internet connection to function effectively. Any disruptions can hinder testing and monitoring processes.
  • Limited Offline Support
    Runscope lacks robust offline support, making it less ideal for developing and testing in environments without reliable internet connectivity.
  • Custom Automation Scripts
    Creating and managing complex, custom automation scripts can be challenging, requiring more advanced programming skills and understanding of Runscope’s scripting environment.
  • Limited Storage for Test Results
    The data retention period for test results may be limited based on the subscription tier, which can be a constraint for long-term projects requiring historical data analysis.

Aspen - API Testing for macOS features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Runscope videos

+ Add

Runscope Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Creating Runscope Tests from CA API Management

Aspen - API Testing for macOS videos

No Aspen - API Testing for macOS videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Runscope and Aspen - API Testing for macOS)

Runscope

Aspen - API Testing for macOS

API Tools
91 91%
API Tools
9% 9
Developer Tools
88 88%
Developer Tools
12% 12
APIs
88 88%
APIs
12% 12
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
Monitoring Tools
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Runscope and Aspen - API Testing for macOS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Aspen - API Testing for macOS might be a bit more popular than Runscope. We know about 1 link to it since March 2021 and only 1 link to Runscope. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Runscope mentions (1)

  • Show HN: Hurl.it Is Back
    Hurl.it was originally created by Chris Wanstrath and Leah Culver for the 2009 Rails Rumble. Hurl.it was acquired and maintained by https://twilio.com for awhile. Hurl.it was acquired and relaunched by https://runscope.com in 2013. Hurl.it was acquired and relaunched by https://pipedream.com in 2021. - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago

Aspen - API Testing for macOS mentions (1)

  • Privacy first API Testing client for Mac
    This is where a tool like Aspen comes in, a native built privacy focused API testing tool. There is no login required, and no requests go to anywhere other than your local machine - unless you choose to share a request with another user. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Runscope and Aspen - API Testing for macOS, you can also consider the following products

Postman - The Collaboration Platform for API Development

Thunder Client - Rest API client for VS Code, lightweight Postman alternative

HttpMaster - HttpMaster is a professional software tool for testing and debugging HTTP applications, primarily aimed at REST API applications and web services.

Hoppscotch - Open source API development ecosystem

API Tester - API Tester is the first mobile app to test any type of API on the go. Including REST, GraphQL, WebSocket, SOAP, JSON RPC, XML, HTTP, HTTPS.

API Fortress - API performance, accuracy, and uptime testing. Without code.

Loading...