Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Runnable VS Codeship

Compare Runnable VS Codeship and see what are their differences

Mixo
AI-powered website builder that helps you create professional sites in minutes featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Runnable logo Runnable

We're thrilled to announce the Runnable team is joining MuleSoft.

Codeship logo Codeship

Codeship is a fast and secure hosted Continuous Delivery platform that scales with your needs.
  • Runnable Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-19
  • Codeship Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-19

Runnable features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Runnable provides a user-friendly interface that simplifies the process of setting up, deploying, and managing containerized applications.
  • Rapid Prototyping
    The platform allows developers to quickly spin up development environments, enabling faster prototyping and testing of new features.
  • Isolation of Environments
    Runnable enables the creation of isolated environments, which helps in preventing conflicts between different development stages and versions.
  • Integration
    Runnable offers seamless integration with various CI/CD tools and version control systems like GitHub, which enhances the development workflow.
  • Collaboration
    The platform supports collaborative work among development teams, allowing for shared environments and easier team collaboration.

Possible disadvantages of Runnable

  • Learning Curve
    Although designed to be user-friendly, new users might still face a learning curve when familiarizing themselves with the platform's features and functionality.
  • Resource Limitations
    Platform constraints in terms of available resources might limit the ability to fully scale or test resource-intensive applications efficiently.
  • Cost
    Depending on usage patterns and required features, cost can be a potential issue for smaller teams or startups operating on limited budgets.
  • Performance
    The reliance on shared platform infrastructure may lead to potential performance bottlenecks, especially under high load or complex testing scenarios.
  • Dependency on Platform
    Excessive reliance on a specific platform for development environments might lead to challenges if a change in service or discontinuation occurs.

Codeship features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Codeship offers an intuitive interface that simplifies the setup process, making it accessible for developers who may not be experienced with continuous integration (CI) and continuous deployment (CD) tools.
  • Integration with Cloud Services
    Codeship integrates seamlessly with cloud services such as AWS, Google Cloud, and Heroku, facilitating easy deployment of applications.
  • Flexible Workflows
    The tool provides support for both Codeship Basic and Codeship Pro, allowing for flexibility in choosing between a more straightforward or a more customizable CI/CD workflow.
  • Docker Support
    Codeship Pro offers extensive support for Docker, allowing developers to use containerization strategies for their build and deployment processes.
  • Parallel Test Pipelines
    It supports parallel test pipelines, which can significantly speed up the testing process and reduce build times.
  • Slack Integration
    Codeship integrates with communication tools like Slack, enabling notifications and updates directly within team communication channels.

Possible disadvantages of Codeship

  • Cost
    Codeship can be more expensive compared to other CI/CD tools, particularly for larger teams or more complex projects that require more build resources.
  • Limited Customization
    For highly customized CI/CD processes, Codeship Basic might be limiting. Users may need to switch to Codeship Pro, which requires more configuration and a steeper learning curve.
  • Performance Bottlenecks
    Users have reported occasional performance bottlenecks, particularly under heavy workloads, which can slow down the CI/CD pipeline.
  • Plugin Ecosystem
    The plugin ecosystem for Codeship is not as extensive as some other CI/CD tools like Jenkins, potentially limiting its integration capabilities.
  • Learning Curve
    While Codeship Basic is relatively easy to use, Codeship Pro has a steeper learning curve, particularly for users who are new to Docker and advanced CI/CD practices.
  • Support
    Although support is available, some users have reported slower response times and less comprehensive support compared to other CI/CD platforms.

Runnable videos

No Runnable videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Codeship videos

+ Add

LinuxFest Northwest 2017: Continuous Delivery to Microsoft Azure with Docker through Codeship

More videos:

  • Review - The Codeship -- Continuous Deployment made simple

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Runnable and Codeship)

Runnable

Codeship

Developer Tools
42 42%
Developer Tools
58% 58
Continuous Integration
0 0%
Continuous Integration
100% 100
Web Development Tools
100 100%
Web Development Tools
0% 0
DevOps Tools
0 0%
DevOps Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Runnable and Codeship. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Runnable and Codeship

Runnable Reviews

We have no reviews of Runnable yet.
Be the first one to post

Codeship Reviews

The Best Alternatives to Jenkins for Developers
Codeship, a CI/CD platform based in the cloud, has an interface that is easy for users and it can integrate with numerous tools and services people are familiar with. It works well for different programming languages and platforms, which makes it suitable for many teams involved in development work.
Source: morninglif.com
Top 10 Most Popular Jenkins Alternatives for DevOps in 2024
CodeShip is a CloudBees SaaS platform that provides a managed CI/CD experience in the cloud. It’s designed to give control back to developers by providing a guided workflow for creating and maintaining CI/CD pipelines. This avoids much of the complexity that’s associated with Jenkins.
Source: spacelift.io
10 Jenkins Alternatives in 2021 for Developers
You could consider using CodeShip to help you to optimize CI/CD cloud deployment. CodeShip can be used by just about any type of development team that looks to increase the efficiency and automation of their code delivery. You can get started within minutes and gain access to an incredible amount of control when setting everything up. The customization options will seem...
Source: solutionsuggest.com
The Best Alternatives to Jenkins for Developers
CodeShip is a hosted continuous integration and continuous delivery platform found by CloudBees. It provides fast feedback and customized environments to build applications. It provides integration with almost anything and is good at helping you scale as per your needs. It comes free for up to 100 monthly builds.
Source: www.lambdatest.com

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Runnable and Codeship, you can also consider the following products

Now + Github - Deploy your apps from GitHub pull requests as you push!

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

RainforestQA - Insanely simple testing. Create tests for your website in plain English, then run them across all major browsers with a single click. Powered by human intelligence

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

Valist - Automatically created staging environments for every update with a shareable link for testing

Travis CI - Simple, flexible, trustworthy CI/CD tools. Join hundreds of thousands who define tests and deployments in minutes, then scale up simply with parallel or multi-environment builds using Travis CI’s precision syntax—all with the developer in mind.

Loading...