Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

runc VS Hazelcast

Compare runc VS Hazelcast and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

runc logo runc

CLI tool for spawning and running containers according to the OCI specification - opencontainers/runc

Hazelcast logo Hazelcast

Clustering and highly scalable data distribution platform for Java
  • runc Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-21
  • Hazelcast Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-05

runc features and specs

  • Standardization
    runc is part of the Open Containers Initiative (OCI), promoting standardization across container runtimes. This ensures interoperability and broad community support.
  • Lightweight
    As a lightweight and fast CLI tool, runc provides a minimal runtime for environments where resource efficiency is critical.
  • Security
    runc adheres to principles of secure software development and incorporates Linux kernel features like namespaces and cgroups to enhance security.
  • Broad Adoption
    As the reference implementation for OCI, runc is widely adopted and tested in production environments, ensuring reliability.
  • Flexibility
    runc offers the flexibility to handle low-level container configurations, making it suitable for advanced users needing granular control.

Possible disadvantages of runc

  • Complexity for Beginners
    The low-level nature of runc can be daunting for beginners who might prefer higher-level tools like Docker that abstract away complexities.
  • Minimalist Design
    While its simplicity is an advantage, runc lacks some of the advanced features and orchestration capabilities found in other container platforms.
  • Manual Configurations
    Users need to manually handle configurations, which can be error-prone and time-consuming compared to automated solutions.
  • Ecosystem Integration
    runc does not provide direct integration with tools and platforms by default, requiring additional setup for comprehensive ecosystem support.
  • Limited Features
    Compared to complete container platforms, runc offers fewer built-in features, requiring supplementary tools to achieve similar functionalities.

Hazelcast features and specs

  • Scalability
    Hazelcast is designed to scale out horizontally with ease by adding more nodes to the cluster, providing better performance and reliability in distributed environments.
  • In-Memory Data Grid
    Hazelcast stores data in-memory, allowing for extremely fast data access and processing times, which is ideal for applications requiring low latency.
  • High Availability
    Hazelcast offers built-in high availability with its data replication and partitioning features, ensuring data is not lost and the system remains operational during node failures.
  • Ease of Use
    Hazelcast provides a simple and intuitive API, making it accessible to developers and quick to integrate with existing applications.
  • Comprehensive Toolset
    Hazelcast offers a wide range of features including caching, messaging, and distributed computing, all in one platform, which simplifies the architecture by reducing the need for multiple tools.

Possible disadvantages of Hazelcast

  • Memory Usage
    Since Hazelcast operates in-memory, it can consume significant amounts of memory, which may be a concern for applications with large datasets.
  • Complexity in Large Deployments
    While Hazelcast offers scalability, managing and configuring a large-scale deployment can become complex and may require experienced personnel.
  • License Cost
    The enterprise version of Hazelcast, which offers additional features and support, comes with a licensing cost that might not fit all budgets.
  • Limited Language Support
    Hazelcast's strongest support is for Java. While it offers clients for other languages, they may not be as robust or feature-complete as the Java client.
  • Network Latency
    In distributed environments, network latency can impact performance, and as Hazelcast relies on network communication for node interactions, this could be a concern in some scenarios.

runc videos

+ Add

2/21/19 RunC Vulnerability Gives Root Access on Container Systems| AT&T ThreatTraq

More videos:

  • Review - Demo MONEY,TIME - RunC

Hazelcast videos

+ Add

Hazelcast Introduction and cluster demo

More videos:

  • Review - Comparing and Benchmarking Data Grids Apache Ignite vs Hazelcast
  • Demo - Hazelcast Cloud Enterprise - Getting Started Demo Video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to runc and Hazelcast)

runc

Hazelcast

Web Servers
100 100%
Web Servers
0% 0
Databases
0 0%
Databases
100% 100
Web And Application Servers
100 100%
Web And Application Servers
0% 0
NoSQL Databases
0 0%
NoSQL Databases
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using runc and Hazelcast. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare runc and Hazelcast

runc Reviews

We have no reviews of runc yet.
Be the first one to post

Hazelcast Reviews

HazelCast - Redis Replacement
Hazelcast IMDG provides a Discovery Service Provider Interface (SPI), which allows users to implement custom member discovery mechanisms to deploy Hazelcast IMDG on any platform. Hazelcast® Discovery SPI also allows you to use third-party software like Zookeeper, Eureka, Consul, etcd for implementing custom discovery mechanism.
Source: hazelcast.org

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, runc seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 11 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

runc mentions (11)

  • Setup multi node kubernetes cluster using kubeadm
    For kubeadm , kubetlet , kubectl should same version package in this lab I used v1.31 to have 1.31.7 References: Https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/networking/ports-and-protocols/ Https://kubernetes.io/docs/setup/production-environment/tools/kubeadm/install-kubeadm/ Https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/releases/... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Comparing 3 Docker container runtimes - Runc, gVisor and Kata Containers
    Previously I wrote about the multiple variants of Docker and also the dependencies behind the Docker daemon. One of the dependencies was the container runtime called runc. That is what creates the usual containers we are all familiar with. When you use Docker, this is the default runtime, which is understandable since it was started by Docker, Inc. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • You run containers, not dockers - Discussing Docker variants, components and versioning
    Now we have dockerd which uses containerd, but containerd will not create containers directly. It needs a runtime and the default runtime is runc, but that can be changed. Containerd actually doesn't have to know the parameters of the runtime. There is a shim process between containerd and runc, so containerd knows the parameters of the shim, and the shim knows the parameters of runc or other runtimes. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • US Cybersecurity: The Urgent Need for Memory Safety in Software Products
    It's interesting that, in light of things like this, you still see large software companies adding support for new components written in non-memory safe languages (e.g. C) As an example Red Hat OpenShift added support for crun(https://github.com/containers/crun), which is written in C as an alternative to runc, which is written in Go( - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Why did the Krustlet project die?
    Yeah, runtimeClass lets you specify which CRI plugin you want based on what you have available. Here's an example from the containerd documentation - you could have one node that can run containers under standard runc, gvisor, kata containers, or WASM. Without runtimeClass, you'd need either some form of custom solution or four differently configured nodes to run those different runtimes. That's how krustlet did... Source: over 2 years ago
View more

Hazelcast mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Hazelcast yet. Tracking of Hazelcast recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing runc and Hazelcast, you can also consider the following products

Docker Hub - Docker Hub is a cloud-based registry service

Redis - Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.

Apache Thrift - An interface definition language and communication protocol for creating cross-language services.

memcached - High-performance, distributed memory object caching system

Eureka - Eureka is a contact center and enterprise performance through speech analytics that immediately reveals insights from automated analysis of communications including calls, chat, email, texts, social media, surveys and more.

Apache Ignite - high-performance, integrated and distributed in-memory platform for computing and transacting on...

Loading...