Software Alternatives & Reviews

Ruby VS Steel Bank Common Lisp

Compare Ruby VS Steel Bank Common Lisp and see what are their differences

Ruby logo Ruby

A dynamic, interpreted, open source programming language with a focus on simplicity and productivity

Steel Bank Common Lisp logo Steel Bank Common Lisp

Steel Bank Common Lisp (SBCL) is a high performance Common Lisp compiler.
  • Ruby Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-30

We recommend LibHunt Ruby for discovery and comparisons of trending Ruby projects.

  • Steel Bank Common Lisp Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-04-24

Ruby videos

Ruby Programming Language - Full Course

Steel Bank Common Lisp videos

No Steel Bank Common Lisp videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Ruby and Steel Bank Common Lisp)
Programming Language
69 69%
31% 31
OOP
73 73%
27% 27
IDE
0 0%
100% 100
Generic Programming Language

User comments

Share your experience with using Ruby and Steel Bank Common Lisp. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Ruby and Steel Bank Common Lisp

Ruby Reviews

The 10 Best Programming Languages to Learn Today
With the growing popularity of Apple operating systems and applications, having Swift programming skills under your belt is a wise investment. Swift shares some similar characteristics with programming languages Ruby and Python.
Source: ict.gov.ge

Steel Bank Common Lisp Reviews

We have no reviews of Steel Bank Common Lisp yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Steel Bank Common Lisp should be more popular than Ruby. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Ruby mentions (3)

  • A full-stack serverless application with AssemblyLift and Next.js
    The counter function is written in Ruby. Since Ruby is an interpreted language, AssemblyLift deploys a customized Ruby 3.1 interpreter compiled to WebAssembly, which executes the function handler. Since the interpreter is somewhat large, the cold-start time of a Ruby function tends to be larger than that of a Rust function. Our counter is being run in the backround, so we're fine with it being a little bit laggy... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Why is no one promoting ruby?
    But, in general I was told use rubyapi.org unless you _really_ want to stick with the ruby-lang.org docs for all you do (which is fine) or to dig more into some object hierarchy, etc. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Looking for pwsh (core/open source, v7) integration w/ rbenv, asdf
    [2] 'rbenv' - https://github.com/rbenv/rbenv - Ruby version management utility. Run something like rbenv install 3.1.1 to install that version on your system (requires related project ruby-build), then rbenv local 3.1.1 in your code's directory to specify that for any ruby command in that directory only, you want to use version 3.1.1 that you installed through rbenv. Does other useful stuff too. Only does Ruby,... Source: about 2 years ago

Steel Bank Common Lisp mentions (5)

  • Not only Clojure – Chez Scheme: Lisp with native code speed
    Tangential: if we're talking Lisp and native code speed, Steel Bank Common Lisp (by default) compiles everything to machine code. [0] https://sbcl.org. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • A few newbie questions about lisp
    Q5: Get http://sbcl.org/. Install https://quicklisp.org/. SBCL is the implementation that's the lowest friction, and Quicklisp is a package manager that's almost* painless. Source: 11 months ago
  • [C++20][safety] static_assert is all you need (no leaks, no UB)
    That is what we do in Lisp. Try sbcl if you haven't tried it yet. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Trying to wrap my head around `xbps-src`
    I want to add the sbcl-doc subpackage (the manual for SBCL in GNU Info format), but first I need to understand how to write package definitions. As far as I understand there are the "templates" which are shell scripts that describe how a package is to be built and installed, and xbps-src is a shell script which can process these templates to actually carry out the work. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Areas in Programming to Avoid
    > Lisp looks like Python, that's far from C, and usually it's a "interpreted" language, far from machine the currently most popular Common Lisp implementation is based around an optimizing native code compiler. That compiler has its roots in the early 80s. See https://sbcl.org . It's far away from being 'interpreted'. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Ruby and Steel Bank Common Lisp, you can also consider the following products

Python - Python is a clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.

Hy - Hy is a wonderful dialect of Lisp that’s embedded in Python.

JavaScript - Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions

CMU Common Lisp - CMUCL is a high-performance, free Common Lisp implementation.

C++ - Has imperative, object-oriented and generic programming features, while also providing the facilities for low level memory manipulation

CLISP - CLISP is a portable ANSI Common Lisp implementation and development environment by Bruno Haible.