Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Ruby VS Objective-C

Compare Ruby VS Objective-C and see what are their differences

Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Ruby logo Ruby

A dynamic, interpreted, open source programming language with a focus on simplicity and productivity

Objective-C logo Objective-C

The primary programming language you use when writing software for OS X and iOS
  • Ruby Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-30

We recommend LibHunt Ruby for discovery and comparisons of trending Ruby projects.

  • Objective-C Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-28

We recommend LibHunt Objective-C for discovery and comparisons of trending Objective-C projects.

Ruby features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Ruby is designed with a focus on simplicity and productivity. Its syntax is easy to read and write, which makes it accessible for beginners as well as enjoyable for seasoned developers.
  • Rich Libraries
    Ruby boasts a large ecosystem of libraries and frameworks, such as Ruby on Rails, which speed up the development process and provide robust solutions for common tasks.
  • Community Support
    Ruby has a vibrant and active community, which means lots of resources, gems (libraries), and forums are available for learning and problem-solving.
  • Dynamic Typing
    Ruby's dynamic typing allows for more flexible and rapid development, as it doesn't require variable type declarations and allows for more expressive code.
  • Meta-Programming
    Ruby has powerful meta-programming capabilities that allow developers to write more abstract and flexible code, reducing repetition and improving code maintainability.

Possible disadvantages of Ruby

  • Performance
    Ruby is generally slower compared to languages like C, Java, and Go. This can be a significant drawback for applications where performance is critically important.
  • Concurrency
    While Ruby has some support for concurrency, it is not as robust as in other languages like Java or Erlang. This can be a limitation for highly concurrent applications.
  • Memory Usage
    Ruby applications tend to consume more memory compared to those written in other languages, which can be a drawback for large-scale applications or resource-constrained environments.
  • Not Suitable for All Types of Applications
    While Ruby excels in web development, particularly with Ruby on Rails, it may not be the best choice for system-level programming, real-time systems, or applications requiring fine-grained control over hardware.
  • Dependency on Gems
    While the rich ecosystem of gems is a strength, it can also be a downside. Over-reliance on third-party libraries can lead to dependencies on potentially unmaintained or poorly supported gems.

Objective-C features and specs

  • Mature Language
    Objective-C has been around since the 1980s, which means it has a long history of use in Apple's ecosystem, leading to a wealth of documentation, resources, and a stable, well-understood language.
  • Dynamic Runtime
    Objective-C's dynamic runtime allows for a high level of flexibility, such as dynamically loading classes and methods, which can be beneficial in certain programming scenarios requiring runtime adjustments.
  • C Compatibility
    Objective-C is a superset of C, which means it retains all functionalities of C, allowing low-level manipulation and the ability to integrate existing C libraries easily.
  • Rich Library Support
    With strong ties to Apple's ecosystem, Objective-C has extensive support for native libraries like Cocoa and Cocoa Touch, enabling efficient iOS and macOS application development.
  • Proven Track Record
    Many successful applications have been built using Objective-C, illustrating its capabilities in handling complex and large-scale applications.

Possible disadvantages of Objective-C

  • Complex Syntax
    The syntax of Objective-C can be verbose and complex compared to modern languages, leading to a steeper learning curve for new developers.
  • Limited Adoption Outside Apple Ecosystem
    Objective-C is primarily used within Apple's ecosystem, limiting its applicability and adoption in other platforms or general software development.
  • Lack of Modern Features
    Compared to newer programming languages like Swift, Objective-C lacks some modern programming features such as type safety, which can lead to more runtime errors.
  • Memory Management
    Although ARC (Automatic Reference Counting) has simplified memory management, developers still have to be conscientious about memory usage compared to simpler garbage-collected environments.
  • Performance Considerations
    The dynamic nature of Objective-C can introduce performance overhead, as dynamic message sending is slower compared to static method calls in languages like Swift.

Ruby videos

+ Add

Ruby Programming Language - Full Course

Objective-C videos

+ Add

Welcome to Objective-C for Swift Devs!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Ruby and Objective-C)

Ruby

Objective-C

Programming Language
71 71%
Programming Language
29% 29
OOP
68 68%
OOP
32% 32
Generic Programming Language
75 75%
Generic Programming Language
25% 25
Development
41 41%
Development
59% 59

User comments

Share your experience with using Ruby and Objective-C. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Ruby and Objective-C

Ruby Reviews

The 10 Best Programming Languages to Learn Today
With the growing popularity of Apple operating systems and applications, having Swift programming skills under your belt is a wise investment. Swift shares some similar characteristics with programming languages Ruby and Python.
Source: ict.gov.ge

Objective-C Reviews

We have no reviews of Objective-C yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Ruby seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Ruby mentions (4)

  • What I posted this week about Ruby
    On Thursday, I shared the importance of contributing to Ruby's documentation, and I wanted to show that even a small contribution can help. Thus, I showed a small PR I submitted for the ruby-lang.org website:. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • A full-stack serverless application with AssemblyLift and Next.js
    The counter function is written in Ruby. Since Ruby is an interpreted language, AssemblyLift deploys a customized Ruby 3.1 interpreter compiled to WebAssembly, which executes the function handler. Since the interpreter is somewhat large, the cold-start time of a Ruby function tends to be larger than that of a Rust function. Our counter is being run in the backround, so we're fine with it being a little bit laggy... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Why is no one promoting ruby?
    But, in general I was told use rubyapi.org unless you _really_ want to stick with the ruby-lang.org docs for all you do (which is fine) or to dig more into some object hierarchy, etc. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Looking for pwsh (core/open source, v7) integration w/ rbenv, asdf
    [2] 'rbenv' - https://github.com/rbenv/rbenv - Ruby version management utility. Run something like rbenv install 3.1.1 to install that version on your system (requires related project ruby-build), then rbenv local 3.1.1 in your code's directory to specify that for any ruby command in that directory only, you want to use version 3.1.1 that you installed through rbenv. Does other useful stuff too. Only does Ruby,... Source: about 3 years ago

Objective-C mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Objective-C yet. Tracking of Objective-C recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Ruby and Objective-C, you can also consider the following products

Python - Python is a clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.

C++ - Has imperative, object-oriented and generic programming features, while also providing the facilities for low level memory manipulation

JavaScript - Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions

Perl - Highly capable, feature-rich programming language with over 26 years of development

Java - A concurrent, class-based, object-oriented, language specifically designed to have as few implementation dependencies as possible

Pike programming language - Dynamic programming language with a syntax similar to Java and C

Loading...