As a ruby developer, I was happy to find that VS Code / TextMate grammar files use the same regular expression engine called Oniguruma as ruby itself. Thus, I could be sure that when trying my regular expressions in my favorite online regex tool, rubular.com, there would be no inconsistencies due to the engine inner workings. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago

In my testing on a couple of regex testers (https://rubular.com/ & https://regex101.com/) this seems to select the postcode correctly each time. Source: 12 months ago

Copied from Rubular ( a nice tool to test regexes ):. Source: over 1 year ago

To add on to this from a regex perspective - I find regex to be invaluable in my workflows. Once you learn the basics I always test and debug my strings using https://rubular.com because it has string hints at the bottom that are readily available. Source: over 1 year ago

Mostly trial and error using pythex.org for python, regextester.com for c/c++, or rubular.com if you're coding in ruby for some reason. Source: over 1 year ago

You may be able to replace some of your curl+shell with Hurl — https://hurl.dev/#also-an-http-test-tool . - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

I am currently looking for a solution to run automated tests on a sql website generator I am working on ( https://sql.ophir.dev ) I wanted to use hurl (https://hurl.dev/), but Bruno's UI seems to be useful while developing the tests... Has someone tried both ? Which is better for automated testing, including when the response type is html and not json? - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

Shameless promotion: Hurl [1] is an Open Source cli using libcurl to run and tests HTTP requests with plain text! We use libcurl for the super reliability and top features (HTTP/3 for instance) and we've added little features like: - requests chaining, - capturing and passing data from a response to another request, - response tests (JSONPath, XPath, etc...) There is nice syntax sugar for resuesting... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

- This too will suffer the same fate as the previous two and will gradually also adopt a busy, unworkable, confusing UI This is why I’ve started using Hurl because that doesn’t even have a UI. Bonus: can be kept in source control and run as part of CI/CD. https://www.communication-generation.com/enshitification/ https://hurl.dev/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

Testing our application is a matter of running npm run start:dev and making requests to it. To test it better I'll leave a Hurl file in the repository that you can use to test the API. You can run it using hurl --test ./collection.hurl. This will run all the tests and make sure that everything is working as expected. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago