Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

rubular VS Google Open Source

Compare rubular VS Google Open Source and see what are their differences

rubular logo rubular

A ruby based regular expression editor

Google Open Source logo Google Open Source

All of Googles open source projects under a single umbrella
  • rubular Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-19
  • Google Open Source Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-22

rubular features and specs

  • Immediate Feedback
    Rubular provides instantaneous feedback on your regex patterns, making it easier to see if your regular expressions are correct and behaving as expected.
  • Simple Interface
    The website has a straightforward and easy-to-use interface that allows users to paste text and immediately test their regex.
  • Ruby-Based
    Rubular utilizes Ruby for regex testing, which is beneficial for Ruby developers who want to ensure their regex works correctly in that specific language context.
  • Offline Syntax Help
    The site offers a built-in regex syntax help section, which can be invaluable for both beginners and experienced users who need a quick reference.

Possible disadvantages of rubular

  • Limited Language Support
    Rubular is designed for Ruby, which means that regular expressions tested on Rubular may not behave the same way in other programming languages.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    Advanced functionalities such as detailed debugging, regex optimization tips, and visual explanations are missing, which can be a disadvantage for more complex regex tasks.
  • No Saved Sessions
    The site doesn't offer a way to save your session or patterns, making it harder to manage and share multiple regex tests over time.
  • No Collaboration Tools
    Rubular lacks collaboration features such as shared workspace or real-time editing, which would benefit teams working on regex patterns together.

Google Open Source features and specs

  • Community Support
    Google Open Source projects often have large, active communities that contribute to the software's development and provide support.
  • Innovation
    Google frequently publishes cutting-edge projects, allowing developers to utilize the latest in technology and innovation.
  • Quality Documentation
    Google Open Source projects generally come with comprehensive documentation, making it easier for developers to integrate and utilize their tools.
  • Scalability
    Many of Google's open-source projects are designed to scale efficiently, benefiting from Google's extensive experience in handling large-scale systems.
  • Integration with Other Google Services
    Open-source projects from Google often integrate smoothly with other Google services and platforms, providing a cohesive ecosystem.

Possible disadvantages of Google Open Source

  • Dependency on Google
    Being tied to Google ecosystems might lead to dependencies, making it harder for developers to switch to other alternatives.
  • Data Privacy Concerns
    Some developers are wary of data privacy issues when using tools developed by Google, given the company's history with data collection.
  • Complexity
    Google’s projects can sometimes be complex, requiring a steep learning curve for developers who are not familiar with their systems and methodologies.
  • Licensing Issues
    Open-source licensing can sometimes pose challenges, especially for companies trying to ensure compliance with multiple licensing requirements.
  • Longevity and Support
    Not all Google open-source projects have long-term support, and there is a risk that some projects may be abandoned or shelved.

Analysis of Google Open Source

Overall verdict

  • Google Open Source is generally regarded positively within the developer community due to its significant contributions to widely-used projects and its commitment to maintaining open and collaborative development practices.

Why this product is good

  • Google Open Source (opensource.google) is considered good because it hosts a wide array of high-quality projects that are well-maintained and actively supported by Google and the community. These projects often adhere to strong industry standards, providing reliable tools and libraries that developers around the world can use. Additionally, the open-source nature allows developers to contribute, inspect the source code, and modify it to fit their needs, which promotes transparency and innovation.

Recommended for

    This is recommended for developers looking for mature, scalable, and robust open-source solutions. It’s also ideal for organizations seeking to build upon a reliable foundation of tools, tech enthusiasts eager to learn and contribute to open source projects, and anyone interested in the collaborative world of software development.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to rubular and Google Open Source)
Regular Expressions
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Programming Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Productivity
44 44%
56% 56

User comments

Share your experience with using rubular and Google Open Source. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

rubular might be a bit more popular than Google Open Source. We know about 36 links to it since March 2021 and only 25 links to Google Open Source. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

rubular mentions (36)

  • Ask HN: How did you learn Regex?
    I read a lot on https://www.regular-expressions.info and experimented on https://rubular.com since I was also learning Ruby at the time. https://regexr.com is another good tool that breaks down your regex and matches. One of the things I remember being difficult at the beginning was the subtle differences between implementations, like `^` meaning "beginning of line" in Ruby (and others) but meaning "beginning of... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • Building a syntax highlighting extension for VS Code
    As a ruby developer, I was happy to find that VS Code / TextMate grammar files use the same regular expression engine called Oniguruma as ruby itself. Thus, I could be sure that when trying my regular expressions in my favorite online regex tool, rubular.com, there would be no inconsistencies due to the engine inner workings. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Data cleaning problem
    In my testing on a couple of regex testers (https://rubular.com/ & https://regex101.com/) this seems to select the postcode correctly each time. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Anchor
    Copied from Rubular ( a nice tool to test regexes ):. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Advice on preparing for the Alteryx Advanced Exam?
    To add on to this from a regex perspective - I find regex to be invaluable in my workflows. Once you learn the basics I always test and debug my strings using https://rubular.com because it has string hints at the bottom that are readily available. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

Google Open Source mentions (25)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing rubular and Google Open Source, you can also consider the following products

RegExr - RegExr.com is an online tool to learn, build, and test Regular Expressions.

LaunchKit - Open Source - A popular suite of developer tools, now 100% open source.

Expresso - The award-winning Expresso editor is equally suitable as a teaching tool for the beginning user of regular expressions or as a full-featured development environment for the experienced programmer with an extensive knowledge of regular expressions.

GitHub Sponsors - Get paid to build what you love on GitHub

RegEx Generator - RegEx Generator is a simple-to-use application that comes with the brilliance of intuitive regex and is also helping you out to test the regex.

Open Collective - Recurring funding for groups.