Software Alternatives & Reviews

RuboCop VS Coveralls

Compare RuboCop VS Coveralls and see what are their differences

RuboCop logo RuboCop

A Ruby static code analyzer, based on the community Ruby style guide.

Coveralls logo Coveralls

Coveralls is a code coverage history and tracking tool that tests coverage reports and statistics for engineering teams.
  • RuboCop Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-30
  • Coveralls Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-24

RuboCop videos

RubyConfBY 2018: Bozhidar Batsov "All about RuboCop"

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How to setup Rubocop and best practices of its usage | Lifehacks on Ruby
  • Review - [EN] All About RuboCop / Bozhidar Batsov @bbatsov

Coveralls videos

High Quality Mens Work Clothing Long Sleeve Coveralls review

More videos:

  • Review - Scentlok coveralls review!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to RuboCop and Coveralls)
Code Analysis
29 29%
71% 71
Code Coverage
20 20%
80% 80
Code Review
100 100%
0% 0
Code Quality
15 15%
85% 85

User comments

Share your experience with using RuboCop and Coveralls. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Coveralls seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 13 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

RuboCop mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of RuboCop yet. Tracking of RuboCop recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Coveralls mentions (13)

  • GitHub Actions for Perl Development
    Cpan_coverage: This calculates the coverage of your test suite and reports the results. It also uploads the results to coveralls.io. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Perl Testing in 2023
    I will normally use GitHub Actions to automatically run my test suite on each push, on every major version of Perl I support. One of the test runs will load Devel::Cover and use it to upload test coverage data to Codecov and Coveralls. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • free-for.dev
    Coveralls.io — Display test coverage reports, free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Containers for Coverage
    Several years ago I got into Travis CI and set up lots of my GitHub repos so they automatically ran the tests each time I committed to the repo. Later on, I also worked out how to tie those test runs into Coveralls.io so I got pretty graphs of how my test coverage was looking. I gave a talk about what I had done. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Comprehensive coverage Jest+Playwright in Next.js TS
    This approach will create two json coverage files, which will be merged together by NYC. Therefore the results will be purely local. If You don't mind using online tools like Codecov or Coveralls for merging data from different tests, then go ahead and use them. They will probably also be more accurate. But if You still want to learn how to get coverage from E2E, then please read through. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing RuboCop and Coveralls, you can also consider the following products

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

CodeClimate - Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.

Prettier - An opinionated code formatter

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

ESLint - The fully pluggable JavaScript code quality tool

SensioLabs Insight - PHP Project Quality Done Right.