Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Rubberduck VS Orwell Dev-C

Compare Rubberduck VS Orwell Dev-C and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Rubberduck logo Rubberduck

Finish your code reviews faster

Orwell Dev-C logo Orwell Dev-C

The official site of the Bloodshed Dev-C++ update, which is fully portable, and optionally ships with a 64bit compiler.
  • Rubberduck Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-12
  • Orwell Dev-C Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-30

Rubberduck features and specs

  • Enhanced Communication
    Rubberduck offers features that improve communication among developers, facilitating better understanding and collaboration in team projects.
  • Increased Productivity
    By providing tools for code review and discussion, Rubberduck can help streamline workflows, potentially increasing overall productivity.
  • Error Reduction
    The platform may assist in identifying bugs and errors during the development process, leading to more reliable and error-free code.
  • Code Quality Improvement
    Through peer reviews and collaborative coding, the quality of the code may be enhanced, ensuring adherence to best practices and standards.

Possible disadvantages of Rubberduck

  • Learning Curve
    New users might face a learning curve when trying to understand and maximize the use of all features offered by Rubberduck.
  • Dependency on Platform
    Relying heavily on Rubberduck for communication and code review may create a dependency, and any downtime could disrupt workflows.
  • Possible Overhead
    Integrating Rubberduck into existing workflows may introduce additional steps, potentially leading to overhead in managing projects.
  • Cost Considerations
    Depending on the pricing model, using Rubberduck might involve costs that need to be weighed against its benefits.

Orwell Dev-C features and specs

  • Free and Open Source
    Orwell Dev-C++ is distributed freely and is open source, which means users can modify and distribute the software according to the open-source license.
  • Lightweight IDE
    The IDE is notably lightweight and fast, making it suitable for smaller projects and older hardware where performance might be an issue.
  • Simple Interface
    Orwell Dev-C++ has a straightforward and simple user interface, which is easy for beginners to understand and use for basic C/C++ programming tasks.
  • Integrated Debugging
    The IDE provides integrated debugging capabilities, which helps developers in testing and troubleshooting their code more effectively within the environment.
  • Supports Multiple Languages
    Although primarily focused on C and C++, it supports additional languages making it a versatile tool for developers working with multiple programming languages.

Possible disadvantages of Orwell Dev-C

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Compared to newer IDEs like Visual Studio Code or JetBrains CLion, Orwell Dev-C++ lacks some advanced features and integrations that are common in other environments.
  • Scarce Updates
    The software does not frequently receive updates, which can lead to issues with modern development practices or compatibility with newer C++ standards.
  • Outdated Design
    The interface design can seem outdated, which might not appeal to developers accustomed to more modern design aesthetics in software.
  • Limited Support for Large Projects
    While suitable for small to medium projects, it is not as equipped to handle large-scale development tasks efficiently, which can be a drawback for professional environments.
  • Poor Plugin Ecosystem
    There is a lack of community-driven plugins and extensions compared to other popular IDEs, limiting the ability to extend the functionality easily.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Rubberduck and Orwell Dev-C)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
IDE
0 0%
100% 100
Code Coverage
100 100%
0% 0
Text Editors
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Rubberduck and Orwell Dev-C. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Orwell Dev-C seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Rubberduck mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Rubberduck yet. Tracking of Rubberduck recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Orwell Dev-C mentions (1)

  • IDE for windows-xp
    I used to use Dev-C++ back in the day. Last release was in 2015, unsure if it supports XP, but you could always keep going backwards until you find a working one. http://orwelldevcpp.blogspot.com/. Source: over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Rubberduck and Orwell Dev-C, you can also consider the following products

Codebeat for iOS - Automated code review for iOS

Netbeans - NetBeans IDE 7.0. Develop desktop, mobile and web applications with Java, PHP, C/C++ and more. Runs on Windows, Linux, Mac OS X and Solaris. NetBeans IDE is open-source and free.

Figstack - Your intelligent coding companion

Qt Creator - Qt Creator is a cross-platform C++, JavaScript and QML integrated development environment. It is the fastest, easiest and most fun experience a C++ developer could wish for.

codebeat - Automated code review for Swift

KDevelop - KDevelop is a free, open source IDE (Integrated Development Environment) for Linux, Solaris, FreeBSD, Mac OS X and other Unix flavors.