Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

RSpec VS Arquillian

Compare RSpec VS Arquillian and see what are their differences

Pipedrive
Sales pipeline software that gets you organized. Helps you focus on the right deals, so easy to use that salespeople just love it. Great for small teams. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

RSpec logo RSpec

RSpec is a testing tool for the Ruby programming language born under the banner of Behavior-Driven Development featuring a rich command line program, textual descriptions of examples, and more.

Arquillian logo Arquillian

Arquillian is an open-source testing platform that offers no more container lifecycle, deployment hassles, and mocks.
  • RSpec Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-09
  • Arquillian Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-02

RSpec features and specs

  • Readable Syntax
    RSpec's syntax is designed to be readable and expressive, making it easier for developers to write and understand tests without extensive background knowledge.
  • Behavior-Driven Development
    RSpec is tailored for Behavior-Driven Development (BDD), allowing developers to focus on the expected behavior of their applications and creating tests that reflect these behaviors.
  • Rich Set of Features
    RSpec provides a comprehensive set of features including test doubles, mocks, stubs, and the ability to test asynchronous code, which makes it versatile for a variety of testing needs.
  • Active Community
    With an active community and extensive documentation, RSpec offers plenty of resources for support and community-driven improvement.
  • Integration with Rails
    RSpec integrates seamlessly with Ruby on Rails applications, providing built-in configurations and generators that enhance productivity.

Possible disadvantages of RSpec

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Developers new to RSpec or BDD might face a learning curve as they become familiar with its unique concepts and syntax compared to more traditional testing frameworks.
  • Overhead for Small Projects
    For small or simple projects, RSpec might add unnecessary complexity or overhead compared to lighter testing frameworks, making it less efficient.
  • Performance
    RSpec can sometimes be slower in execution compared to other Ruby testing frameworks, particularly in large test suites or when running integration tests.
  • Customization Complexity
    While RSpec is highly customizable, the extensive configuration options can sometimes lead to complexity and make it harder to manage if not handled properly.
  • Dependency on Gems
    RSpec often requires additional gems for full functionality or integration with other tools, which can lead to dependency bloat and potential version conflicts.

Arquillian features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

RSpec videos

No RSpec videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Arquillian videos

+ Add

Testing java microservices using Arquillian (Part 1) - learn Other IT & Software

More videos:

  • Review - Testing java microservices using Arquillian (Part 1) - learn Other IT & Software
  • Review - Testing JSF Applications with Arquillian and Selenium

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to RSpec and Arquillian)

RSpec

Arquillian

Automated Testing
71 71%
Automated Testing
29% 29
Browser Testing
69 69%
Browser Testing
31% 31
Tool
0 0%
Tool
100% 100
Testing
100 100%
Testing
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using RSpec and Arquillian. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, RSpec seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 31 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

RSpec mentions (31)

  • 30,656 Pages of Books About the .NET Ecosystem: C#, Blazor, ASP.NET, & T-SQL
    I am very comfortable with Minitest in Ruby. When I started to learn Rails, though, I was surprised by how different RSpec was. In case .NET testing is equally unlike the xUnit style, I should learn the idioms. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • 3 useful VS Code extensions for testing Ruby code
    It supports both RSpec and Minitest as well as any other testing gem. There are flexible configurations options which allow to configure editor with needed testing tool. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Adding Jest To Explainer.js
    I'm a huge supporter for TDD(Test Driven Development). Almost every piece code should be tested. During my co-op more than half of the time I spent writing test for my PR. I believe that experience really helped me understand the necessity of testing. I was surprised to see how similar the testing framework in JS and Ruby are. I used Jest which is very similar to RSpec I have used during my co-op. To mock http... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Exploring the Node.js Native Test Runner
    The describe and it keywords are popularly used in other JavaScript testing frameworks to write and organize unit tests. This style originated in Ruby's Rspec testing library and is commonly known as spec-style testing. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Is the VCR plugged in? Common Sense Troubleshooting For Web Devs
    5. Automated Tests: Unit tests are automated tests that verify the behavior of a small unit of code in isolation. I like to write unit tests for every bug reported by a user. This way, I can reproduce the bug in a controlled environment and verify that the fix works as expected and that we wont see a regression. There are many different JavaScript test frameworks like Jest, cypress, mocha, and jasmine. We use... - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
View more

Arquillian mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Arquillian yet. Tracking of Arquillian recommendations started around Jul 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing RSpec and Arquillian, you can also consider the following products

Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

Testcontainers - Testcontainers is a modern Java library that comes with the exclusive support of Junit tests.

JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.

PHPUnit - Application and Data, Build, Test, Deploy, and Testing Frameworks

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

TestNG - TestNG is a testing framework.

Loading...