rr VS Immunity Debugger

Compare rr VS Immunity Debugger and see what are their differences

BoxyHQ

B2B SaaS: Make your app enterprise-ready! Authentication - SAML/OIDC SSO, Directory Sync (SCIM 2.0), Audit Logs, Data Privacy Vault, and more! featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

rr

rr is a debugging tool designed to record and replay program execution.

Immunity Debugger

Immunity Debugger is a powerful new way to write exploits, analyze malware, and reverse engineer...

Landing page //
2022-03-30

Landing page //
2019-03-11

Bike Test: 2022 Beta 200 RR Review

Immunity Debugger videos

+ Add

[ 3 ] Buffer Overflow - Starting with Immunity Debugger & Fuzzing

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to rr and Immunity Debugger)

Immunity Debugger

IDE

35 35%

IDE

65% 65

Developer Tools

100 100%

Developer Tools

0% 0

Software Development

19 19%

Software Development

81% 81

OS & Utilities

0 0%

OS & Utilities

100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using rr and Immunity Debugger. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, rr seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 58 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

rr mentions (58)

Hermit is a hermetic and reproducible sandbox for running programs
I think this tool must share a lot techniques and use cases with rr. I wonder how it compares in various aspects. https://rr-project.org/ rr "sells" as a "reversible debugger", but it obviously needs the determinism for its record and replay to work, and AFAIK it employs similar techniques regarding system call interception and serializing on a single CPU. The reversible debugger aspect is built on periodic... - Source: Hacker News / 14 days ago
So you think you want to write a deterministic hypervisor?
Https://rr-project.org/ had the same problem. They use the retired conditional branch counter instead of instruction counter, and then instruction steeping until at the correct address. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
Is Something Bugging You?
That'll work great for your Distributed QSort Incorporated startup, where the only product is a sorting algorithm. Formal software verification is very useful. But what can be usefully formalized is rather limited, and what can be formalized correctly in practice is even more limited. That means you need to restrict your scope to something sane and useful. As a result, in the real world running thousands of tests... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
When "letting it crash" is not enough
The approach of check-pointing computation such that it is resumable and restartable sounds similar to a time-traveling debugger, like rr or WinDbg: https://rr-project.org/ https://learn.microsoft.com/windows-hardware/drivers/debuggercmds/time-travel-debugging-overview. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
When I got started I debugged using printf() today I debug with print()
Yes, it's called rr. https://rr-project.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago