RocketCake VS GitHub Pages

RocketCake Reviews

1. Erik    

   about 2 years ago
   Great editor, does everything you need

   I created a few nice looking websites with the free version of RocketCake - it it very easy to use and simply gets out of the way. It has all the options I need and you can create complicated stuff with mostly a few clicks.

   🏁 Competitors: Adobe Dreamweaver, Sandvox, WYSIWYG Web Builder, NetObjects Fusion

   👍 Pros:    Easy to use|Quick and easy|Fully responsive

   👎 Cons:    None so far

GitHub Pages Reviews

RocketCake mentions (0)

GitHub Pages mentions (466)

• Yet Another Tour of an Open-Source Elm SPA

  For this application, Elm controlled the routing. So, I had to adapt the scripts to deploy to Netlify instead of GitHub Pages. Why? Because you need to be able to tell the web server to redirect all relevant requests to the application. GitHub Pages doesn't have support for it. - Source: dev.to / 12 days ago

• How to build your interactive resume in 4 simple and 2 easy steps

  It's super easy to publish a static site like the resume with GitHub Pages. Just check out the docs. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago

• 100+ FREE Resources Every Web Developer Must Try

  GitHub Pages: Host your static websites directly from your GitHub repository. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

• Ask HN: Looking for lightweight personal blogging platform

  As per many other comments, it sounds like a static site generator like Hugo (https://gohugo.io/) or Jekyll (https://jekyllrb.com/), hosted on GitHub Pages (https://pages.github.com/) or GitLab Pages (https://about.gitlab.com/stages-devops-lifecycle/pages/), would be a good match. If you set up GitHub Actions or GitLab CI/CD to do the build and deploy (see e.g.... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

• Top 20 Free Static Web Hosting Services in 2024 ⚡️

  Ideal for open source projects, docs sites, and portfolios. GitHub Pages. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago