Based on our record, DOSBox-X seems to be a lot more popular than RetroX. While we know about 58 links to DOSBox-X, we've tracked only 2 mentions of RetroX. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Get this instead https://retrox.tv. Source: over 1 year ago
I know everyone has their opinions about using paid emulators, but I bought a copy of RetroX on a black friday or Christmas sale or something like that several years ago for my shield and I'm very happy with it. I map an NFS share off my fileserver that holds all my roms, and I use a bluetooth xbone controller with it and have very few, if any, problems. Source: over 1 year ago
If you want to use DOS productivity software or DOS database programs, go with https://dosbox-x.com/ or https://www.vdos.info/. Source: 5 months ago
He probably meant this fork https://dosbox-x.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
Have you tried DOSBox-X yet? It officially runs Windows 98 and can be mostly configured through a UI. Source: 9 months ago
Https://dosbox-x.com/ if you want a version where modern controllers work properly. Source: 11 months ago
You also have forks, like dosbox-x that provide cycle accurate emulation, and allows you to run Windows, Glide games, and support midi output in it. It does run slower however. Source: 11 months ago
RetroArch - RetroArch is a frontend for emulators, game engines and media players.
DOSBox - DOSBox is a DOS-emulator that uses the SDL-library.
RetriX - RetriX is an emulator front end for UWP, on all the hardware platforms it supports: it serves the...
vDos - vDos lets you conveniently run DOS applications by emulating a (spiced up) DOS PC in a window.
AmpShell - AmpShell is a DOSBox front-end for Windows.
vDosPlus - vDosPlus (formerly vDos-lfn) is a free general-purpose non-gaming DOS emulator running on Windows...