Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Resque VS LiteSpeed Web Server

Compare Resque VS LiteSpeed Web Server and see what are their differences

LaunchBrightly
Automatically generate screenshots reflecting the latest version of your product and eliminate the manual burden of updating product screenshots in your help center. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Resque logo Resque

Resque is a Redis-backed Ruby library for creating background jobs, placing them on multiple queues, and processing them later.

LiteSpeed Web Server logo LiteSpeed Web Server

LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.
  • Resque Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-04
  • LiteSpeed Web Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-31

Resque videos

No Resque videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

LiteSpeed Web Server videos

+ Add

What Is LiteSpeed Web Server?

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Resque and LiteSpeed Web Server)

Resque

LiteSpeed Web Server

Data Integration
100 100%
Data Integration
0% 0
Web And Application Servers
0 0%
Web And Application Servers
100% 100
Stream Processing
100 100%
Stream Processing
0% 0
Web Servers
0 0%
Web Servers
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Resque and LiteSpeed Web Server. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Resque and LiteSpeed Web Server

Resque Reviews

We have no reviews of Resque yet.
Be the first one to post

LiteSpeed Web Server Reviews

Litespeed vs Nginx vs Apache: Web Server Showdown
LiteSpeed Web Server, abbreviated as LSWS, is almost a newcomer to the webserver ‘scene’. It has gained a huge, perhaps even cult-like following in the last few years among web hosting companies due to its efficiency. With its streamlined architecture, companies running LiteSpeed Web Server could (theoretically) double the maximum capacity of websites their servers, assuming...
Source: chemicloud.com
Top Linux Web Servers: Pros and Cons
LiteSpeed comes in two versions: a free one known as OpenLiteSpeed and a paid enterprise version with extended functionality.
Source: bigstep.com
Alternative web servers compared: Lighttpd, Nginx, LiteSpeed and Zeus
Brief info: LiteSpeed is a commercial web server designed specifically for large websites. One of LiteSpeed’s advantages is that it can read Apache configurations directly which makes it easy to integrate with existing products to replace Apache. The server is lightweight and as the name implies very fast.
Source: www.pingdom.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Resque seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Resque mentions (5)

  • Add web scraping data into the database at regular intervals [ruby & ror]
    You can use a background job queue like Resque to scrape and process data in the background, and a scheduler like resque-scheduler to schedule jobs to run your scraper periodically. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • How to run a really long task from a Rails web request
    So how do we trigger such a long-running process from a Rails request? The first option that comes to mind is a background job run by some of the queuing back-ends such as Sidekiq, Resque or DelayedJob, possibly governed by ActiveJob. While this would surely work, the problem with all these solutions is that they usually have a limited number of workers available on the server and we didn’t want to potentially... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Building a dynamic staging platform
    Background jobs are another limitation. Since only the Aha! Web service runs in a dynamic staging, the host environment's workers would process any Resque jobs that were sent to the shared Redis instance. If your branch hadn't updated any background-able methods, this would be no big deal. But if you were hoping to test changes to these methods, you would be out of luck. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • #30DaysofAppwrite : Appwrite’s building blocks
    The Schedules worker corresponds to the appwrite-schedule service in the docker-compose file. The Schedules worker uses a Resque Scheduler under the hood and handles the scheduling of CRON jobs across Appwrite. This includes CRON jobs from the Tasks API, Webhooks API, and the functions API. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
  • A quick look at background jobs in Ruby
    There are a few of popular systems. A few need a database, such as Delayed::Job, while others prefer Redis, such as Resque and Sidekiq. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago

LiteSpeed Web Server mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of LiteSpeed Web Server yet. Tracking of LiteSpeed Web Server recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Resque and LiteSpeed Web Server, you can also consider the following products

Sidekiq - Sidekiq is a simple, efficient framework for background job processing in Ruby

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

Hangfire - An easy way to perform background processing in .NET and .NET Core applications.

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows

delayed_job - Database based asynchronous priority queue system -- Extracted from Shopify - collectiveidea/delayed_job

Apache HTTP Server - Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996

Loading...