Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Resilio Sync VS HTTP

Compare Resilio Sync VS HTTP and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Resilio Sync logo Resilio Sync

Resilient, fast and scalable file synchronization for enterprises and individuals

HTTP logo HTTP

is an application protocol for distributed, collaborative, and hypermedia information systems.
  • Resilio Sync Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-27
  • HTTP Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-21

Resilio Sync features and specs

  • Decentralized Architecture
    Resilio Sync uses a peer-to-peer (P2P) architecture, eliminating the need for a central server. This can result in faster file transfer speeds and lower costs since it distributes the load among users.
  • End-to-End Encryption
    Files transferred using Resilio Sync are encrypted end-to-end, ensuring data privacy and security.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Resilio Sync is available on multiple platforms including Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, and Android, offering great flexibility.
  • Selective Sync
    Users can choose which files and folders to synchronize, saving bandwidth and storage space.
  • Scalability
    Resilio Sync can handle a large number of files and connections, making it suitable for both small and large scale uses.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The application features a simple and intuitive user interface that makes it accessible even for non-technical users.

Possible disadvantages of Resilio Sync

  • No Versioning
    Resilio Sync does not offer built-in file versioning, unlike some other file synchronization services.
  • Initial Setup Complexity
    The initial setup and configuration can be somewhat complex, especially for users who are not familiar with networking and P2P concepts.
  • Limited Free Plan
    The free version of Resilio Sync has limitations in terms of features and the number of devices that can be synced.
  • Reliance on Active Peers
    File synchronization relies on the availability of other peers, which can be a disadvantage if a peer goes offline.
  • Resource Usage
    Because it is a P2P system, Resilio Sync can use significant network and CPU resources, which may impact overall system performance.
  • Security Concerns
    Despite end-to-end encryption, the decentralized nature of Resilio Sync may still present some security risks, particularly in less controlled environments.

HTTP features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis of Resilio Sync

Overall verdict

  • Overall, Resilio Sync is considered a good choice for individuals and teams seeking a reliable and private file synchronization solution without using traditional cloud storage.

Why this product is good

  • Resilio Sync, formerly known as BitTorrent Sync, is appreciated for its peer-to-peer architecture, which allows for fast and efficient file synchronization without relying on cloud servers. It offers robust end-to-end encryption, ensuring data security and privacy. Additionally, it provides flexibility in managing and sharing files across different devices and platforms.

Recommended for

  • Users who prioritize privacy and do not want their files stored on third-party servers.
  • Teams needing to synchronize large amounts of data quickly and efficiently.
  • Individuals looking for cross-platform compatibility across Windows, macOS, Linux, and mobile devices.
  • Tech-savvy users who appreciate the advantages of peer-to-peer technology.

Resilio Sync videos

Resilio Sync Setup Guide

More videos:

  • Review - Resilio Sync - FREE & BETTER Than Dropbox, Google Drive, OneDrive, iCloud?
  • Review - Why We Use Resilio Sync

HTTP videos

No HTTP videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Resilio Sync and HTTP)
File Sharing
100 100%
0% 0
Security
0 0%
100% 100
Cloud Storage
100 100%
0% 0
Web Browsers
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Resilio Sync and HTTP. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Resilio Sync and HTTP

Resilio Sync Reviews

The 5 Best File Syncing Apps
File syncing apps have plenty of uses, and the apps covered here work well for most needs. For example, Dropbox stores your files online so that you can access them anywhere, while Resilio Sync skips servers altogether and syncs via a peer-to-peer connection.

HTTP Reviews

We have no reviews of HTTP yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, HTTP seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Resilio Sync mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Resilio Sync yet. Tracking of Resilio Sync recommendations started around Mar 2021.

HTTP mentions (8)

  • State management in Svelte apps
    HTTP was invented as a stateless protocol, which means that each request fully encapsulates all of the information necessary to return a correct response. So historically, web pages never had to worry about managing state - each request to a URL with parameters or with a form submission would receive a response with all of the HTML that the browser needed to render content. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Evolving the Web: Discovering the History of HTTP Versions
    HTTP/1.1 was such a game changer for the Internet that it works so well that even through two revisions, RFC 2616 published in June 1999 and RFC 7230– RFC 7235 published in June 2014, HTTP/1.1 was extremely stable until the release of HTTP/2.0 in 2014 — Nearly 18 years later. Before continuing to the next section about HTTP/2.0, let us revisit what journey HTTP/1.1 has been through. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Poll: Are client web requests sent to upstream servers or downstream servers?
    On the one hand, it just seems natural that "upstream" refers to the inbound request being sent from one system to another. It takes effort (connection pooling, throttling, retries, etc.) to make a request to an (upstream) dependency, just as it takes effort to swim upstream. The response is (usually) easy... Just return it... hence, "downstream". Recall the usual meaning of "upload" and "download". Upstream seems... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • How to cache TCP, SSL handshake on ALB?
    To me it sounds like you’ve not solved this as the config you’ve mentioned is about preventing “illegal” (none RFC7230 ) requests, it isn’t really related to the problem you posted. Source: over 3 years ago
  • HTTP Protocol Overview
    The program you are using to send data to the server may or may not automatically determine the right content-type header for your data, and knowing how to set and check headers is an essential skill. To learn more about the HTTP protocol check out the MDN guide or read the official standard, RFC 7230. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Resilio Sync and HTTP, you can also consider the following products

Dropbox - Online Sync and File Sharing

Dat - Real-time replication and versioning for data sets

Syncthing - Syncthing replaces proprietary sync and cloud services with something open, trustworthy and...

IPFS - IPFS is the permanent web. A new peer-to-peer hypermedia protocol.

Nextcloud - With Nextcloud enterprises host their own secure cloud solution for storage, collaboration & communication from any device, anywhere.

Beaker browser - Beaker is a browser for IPFS and Dat.