Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Requester VS RapidAPI for Mac

Compare Requester VS RapidAPI for Mac and see what are their differences

PulpMiner
Converts Any Webpage Into Realtime JSON API 🟢 featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Requester logo Requester

HTTP client plugin for Sublime Text with an expansive feature set, modern UX, elegant syntax and...

RapidAPI for Mac logo RapidAPI for Mac

Paw is a REST client for Mac.
  • Requester Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-16
  • RapidAPI for Mac Landing page
    Landing page //
    2024-10-20

Requester features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

RapidAPI for Mac features and specs

  • User Interface
    Paw.cloud offers an intuitive and visually appealing user interface, making it easy to design and manage APIs.
  • Team Collaboration
    Paw.cloud supports team collaboration features, allowing multiple users to work on API projects simultaneously.
  • Advanced Request Capabilities
    The platform offers advanced request capabilities, including the ability to customize headers, parameters, and bodies with ease.
  • Extensions and Plugins
    Paw.cloud supports a variety of extensions and plugins, allowing users to extend its functionalities according to their needs.
  • Multi-Environment Support
    The tool provides support for multiple environments, enabling seamless switching between development, staging, and production setups.

Possible disadvantages of RapidAPI for Mac

  • Cost
    Paw.cloud is a paid service, which may not be suitable for individuals or small teams with limited budgets.
  • Platform Limitation
    The software is currently available only for macOS, which limits its accessibility to a wider range of users who might be using other operating systems.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, there is still a learning curve for new users to fully utilize all of its advanced features.
  • Resource Intensive
    Paw.cloud can be resource-intensive, potentially slowing down performance on older hardware.
  • Offline Accessibility
    Some functionalities may be limited or unavailable in offline mode, which could hinder productivity in environments with unstable internet connections.

Analysis of RapidAPI for Mac

Overall verdict

  • RapidAPI for Mac is a strong choice for developers seeking a comprehensive API development and testing environment. Its intuitive design and extensive feature set make it particularly well-suited for Mac users who need an efficient tool to streamline their API workflows.

Why this product is good

  • RapidAPI for Mac, formerly known as Paw, is considered a good tool for API testing and development due to its user-friendly interface, powerful features, and integration capabilities. It supports various authentication methods, allows for detailed request and response configurations, and offers automation through its advanced tools. The ability to easily create and manage HTTP requests makes it a valuable tool for developers working on API-centric applications.

Recommended for

  • Back-end developers
  • API testers
  • Software engineers
  • Tech-savvy individuals using macOS who need robust API development and testing capabilities.

Requester videos

+ Add

Review Requester for Amazon sellers - Sellerise. Dima Kubrak. Amazon FBA. Amazon Private Label.

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How to automate review requests on Amazon! Review Requester from Sellerise! Amazon review request!
  • Review - What is Requester Review?

RapidAPI for Mac videos

+ Add

Dr Paw Paw Review & Demo | Abbey Clayton

More videos:

  • Review - Paw Perfect Review - Testing As Seen On TV Products
  • Review - PAW PATROL: ON A ROLL - REVIEW

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Requester and RapidAPI for Mac)

Requester

RapidAPI for Mac

Developer Tools
9 9%
Developer Tools
91% 91
API Tools
5 5%
API Tools
95% 95
APIs
7 7%
APIs
93% 93
API
100 100%
API
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Requester and RapidAPI for Mac. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Requester and RapidAPI for Mac

Requester Reviews

12 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools
Requester is a robust client that combines the features of HTTPie, Postman, and Paw. It works only with Sublime Text editor.
Source: geekflare.com

RapidAPI for Mac Reviews

Top 10 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools (2023)
Are you a developer that works with macOS? Then Paw is the right pick for you. Paw is specifically built for macOS. As such, it is arguably the best tool for Mac interface. Unlike Postman which majorly revolves around API, Paw is an all-in-one tool for API development, HTTP Client, API description, and more. In terms of its functionalities, it can send all kinds of HTTP...
Source: www.bestproxyreviews.com
12 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools
Paw is a full-featured HTTP client, which allows you to send all kinds of HTTP requests. With Paw, you can test your APIs and also explore new ones.
Source: geekflare.com
15 Best Postman Alternatives for Automated API Testing [2022 Updated]
Paw is an advanced API tool with powerful features designed explicitly for Mac. Its primary function is to test and describe APIs, and it provides a beautiful interface to make activities such as composing requests, inspecting server responses, and exporting API definitions easier.
Source: testsigma.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, RapidAPI for Mac seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 45 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Requester mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Requester yet. Tracking of Requester recommendations started around Mar 2021.

RapidAPI for Mac mentions (45)

  • Learning API Requests with GUI client - The easy way🚀🚀
    Although Apidog is a popular REST client, you can also use others, such as Insomnia, RapidAPI for Mac, and Hoppscotch. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Sending both File and JSON in One Request to Spring Boot
    But it can't help when faced with this complex scenario because it doesn't support set the content-type for text field of a multipart request. I tried Paw, Bruno and they didn't work either. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • The Best Alternatives to Postman for API Testing
    To use Paw, purchase and download it from the Paw website. Open the app, create a new request, and start testing your API endpoints with ease. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • Ask HN: Alternatives to Postman?
    Enjoy it while it lasts: https://paw.cloud/. Really good. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Bruno
    I myself use Paw [0] because it's native to MacOS, but I'm a little bit worried for it's longevity as it being supported by a SaaS business. But so far it's been great to document API for my personal projects. [0]: https://paw.cloud/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Requester and RapidAPI for Mac, you can also consider the following products

Postman - The Collaboration Platform for API Development

soapUI - SoapUI Pro is one of the most prominent API testing platforms around, allowing developers to quickly prototype the functions of their apps and get them to market with little hassle.

Insomnia REST - Design, debug, test, and mock APIs locally, on Git, or cloud. Build better APIs collaboratively for the most popular protocols with a dev‑friendly UI, built-in automation, and an extensible plugin ecosystem.

Apigee - Intelligent and complete API platform

Nightingale REST API Client - Nightingale is a fast, resource-efficient, and full-fledged REST API client for Windows 10.

Hoppscotch - Open source API development ecosystem

Loading...