remove.bg VS ASP.NET

remove.bg Reviews

1. Viking    

   PM at IoT01 | almost 3 years ago

   Erase bg easy,but too expensive..

   🏁 Competitors: PixMiller, Removal.ai

   👍 Pros:    Quality

   👎 Cons:    Expensive

ASP.NET Reviews

remove.bg mentions (293)

• Comment your OCs and I might just draw them

  Thats supposed to be teeth btw, remove.bg just counted that as a bg even tho it was a png. Source: 5 months ago

• I have removed a background via API but how do I access the background file with the image cut out? Is there another way of doing that?

  I have a folder of 50 images and I want to use their backgrounds to train a SD model. I want to cut out the object and inpaint the removed portion. I have tried using the remove.bg api, which does a good job of removing the object, but I dont have the background file. Is there another way of doing this? My goal is to end up with 50 images of the backgrounds that have been inpainted over where the object used to... Source: 8 months ago

• The best AI tools for everyday use and productivity (that are actually free to use)

  Remove.bg: One of the few image AI tools I use regularly. Remove.bg uses simple AI to remove backgrounds from your images. It's very simple, but something I end up doing surprisingly often editing product images, etc. Source: 9 months ago

• What is the coolest web app you've discovered that's free with no signup?

  Remove.bg W for easily copy pasting an image and removing the background. Source: 10 months ago

• Yuri holding a book (Sprite Edit) (free to use)

  Alright ! Thanks, already removed the background, the site is called remove.bg. Source: 11 months ago

ASP.NET mentions (19)

• What’s New in Bold Reports 6.1 April 2024 Release

  The Bold Reporting Tools ASP.NET MVC and ASP.NET Web Forms will no longer be deployed in the embedded build. However, bug fixes are diligently transferred to our public repositories until Microsoft officially announces the end of support for these platforms. For new web application development or to stay up-to-date, Blazor or ASP.NET Core are recommended. - Source: dev.to / 1 day ago

• Is ASP.NET Core the next step in my career being an ASP.NET MVC developer? Or are there other technologies I should look at?

  Sorry for the possibly dumb questions. But then does .NET 5 have a "Model View Controller" workflow? I'm seeing ASP.NET still exists. But it's just "ASP.NET", no "MVC" or "Core" attached to the end. And they seem to recommend Blazor instead of C# which is something I only know the name of. Source: about 1 year ago

• Mixing GCloud and F#

  Cloud functions run aspnet core under the hood, but since it is a controlled environment it was designed in a way that the only concern you should worry about is running your function so all of the usual boilerplate related to adding services, middleware or enabling features is hidden away from you which for most simple scenarios this is what you will need and in the case of F# where dependency injection is more... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Professional transition from Java to C#?

  I'm doing "backend data processing microservices" and the main framework component is ASP. Source: over 1 year ago

• Mudblazor for Blazor

  .NET has had various templating frameworks since its inception in the early 2000's. From the likes of Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF), Windows Forms(WF), ASP.NET Core MVC, Razor Pages to Blazor and now .NET MAUI. Microsoft offers a way to choose an ASP.NET Core web UI for developers to find the right user interface(UI) to use for their solution. The focus however is on Blazor and in particular for webAssembly. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago