Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

RemoteStorage VS Microsoft SQL

Compare RemoteStorage VS Microsoft SQL and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

RemoteStorage logo RemoteStorage

An open protocol for per-user storage OWN YOUR DATA

Microsoft SQL logo Microsoft SQL

Microsoft SQL is a best in class relational database management software that facilitates the database server to provide you a primary function to store and retrieve data.
  • RemoteStorage Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-15
  • Microsoft SQL Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-26

RemoteStorage features and specs

  • User Control
    RemoteStorage allows users to host their own data, giving them greater control over their information and how it's shared with applications. This enhances privacy and security for users.
  • Decentralization
    The platform supports decentralized data storage, reducing reliance on centralized servers and eliminating single points of failure.
  • Interoperability
    RemoteStorage uses a simple protocol that encourages interoperability between various applications, allowing users to switch between apps without losing access to their data.
  • Open Source
    The entire RemoteStorage protocol and libraries are open source, fostering transparency and allowing developers to contribute to its development.
  • Developer-Friendly
    Developers can easily use RemoteStorage libraries to integrate the protocol into their applications, facilitating seamless data management across different services.

Possible disadvantages of RemoteStorage

  • Setup Complexity
    While RemoteStorage offers user control, the need to set up a personal data hosting solution might be complex and challenging for non-technical users.
  • Limited Ecosystem
    As a relatively niche solution, the ecosystem of applications supporting RemoteStorage might be smaller compared to more ubiquitous cloud storage services.
  • Performance Variability
    The performance of data access and synchronization can be variable depending on the hosting infrastructure chosen by the user, potentially leading to slower speeds.
  • Data Management Responsibility
    Users are responsible for managing backups and ensuring data availability, which can add an additional layer of responsibility and risk.
  • Potential Scalability Issues
    Depending on how the personal storage solution is set up, users might experience scalability issues as their storage needs grow.

Microsoft SQL features and specs

  • Comprehensive Feature Set
    SQL Server offers a wide range of features including advanced analytics, in-memory capabilities, robust security measures, and integration services.
  • High Performance
    With in-memory OLTP and support for persistent memory technologies, SQL Server provides high transaction and query performance.
  • Scalability
    SQL Server can scale from small installations on single machines to large, data-intensive applications requiring high throughput and storage.
  • Security
    SQL Server offers advanced security features like encryption, dynamic data masking, and advanced threat protection, ensuring data safety and compliance.
  • Integrations
    It easily integrates with other Microsoft products such as Azure, Power BI, and Active Directory, providing a cohesive ecosystem for enterprise solutions.
  • Developer Friendly
    It supports a wide range of development tools and languages including .NET, Python, Java, and more, making it highly versatile for developers.
  • High Availability
    Features like Always On availability groups and failover clustering provide high availability and disaster recovery options for critical applications.

Possible disadvantages of Microsoft SQL

  • Cost
    SQL Server can be expensive, particularly for the Enterprise edition. Licensing costs can add up quickly depending on the features and scale required.
  • Complexity
    Due to its comprehensive feature set, SQL Server can be complex to configure and manage, requiring skilled administrators and developers.
  • Resource Intensive
    SQL Server can be resource-intensive, requiring substantial hardware resources for optimal performance, which can increase overall operational costs.
  • Windows-Centric
    While SQL Server can run on Linux, it is primarily optimized for and tightly integrated with the Windows ecosystem, which may not suit all organizations.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    Being a proprietary solution, it can cause vendor lock-in, making it challenging to switch to alternative database systems without significant migration efforts.

RemoteStorage videos

No RemoteStorage videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Microsoft SQL videos

3.1 Microsoft SQL Server Review

More videos:

  • Review - What is Microsoft SQL Server?
  • Review - Querying Microsoft SQL Server (T-SQL) | Udemy Instructor, Phillip Burton [bestseller]

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to RemoteStorage and Microsoft SQL)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Databases
0 0%
100% 100
Realtime Backend / API
100 100%
0% 0
Relational Databases
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using RemoteStorage and Microsoft SQL. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, RemoteStorage seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 21 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

RemoteStorage mentions (21)

  • A Local-First Case Study
    Https://remotestorage.io while it's a specific protocol for storing user data on a compatible server, their library also provides Google Drive integration. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Local First, Forever
    Https://remotestorage.io/ was a protocol intended for this. IIRC the visison was that all applications could implement this and you could provide that application with your remotestorage URL, which you could self host. I looked into this some time ago as I was fed up with WebDAV being the only viable open protocol for file shares/synchronization (especially after hosting my own NextCloud instance, which OOMed... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Show HN: RemoteStorage – sync localStorage across devices and browsers
    Not to be confused with https://remotestorage.io/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Simple Lasts Longer
    This doesn't support the various consumer cloud storage APIs, but you've just reminded me of a project I ran into years ago that seems to still be around: https://remotestorage.io/ There's also Solid which attempts to do something similar: https://solidproject.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Simple Lasts Longer
    I have seen one web app uses the remote storage library. It does fit your criteria, but I don't think there is much traction yet. [0]: https://remotestorage.io/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

Microsoft SQL mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Microsoft SQL yet. Tracking of Microsoft SQL recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing RemoteStorage and Microsoft SQL, you can also consider the following products

Firebase - Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications for mobile and web.

MySQL - The world's most popular open source database

Supabase - An open source Firebase alternative

PostgreSQL - PostgreSQL is a powerful, open source object-relational database system.

restdb.io - restdb.io lets you create databases and REST APIs quickly. Development databases are free. Powerful web-based and mobile-friendly data management.

SQLite - SQLite Home Page