Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

RegexPlanet Ruby VS Garden (Clojure)

Compare RegexPlanet Ruby VS Garden (Clojure) and see what are their differences

LibHunt
LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

RegexPlanet Ruby logo RegexPlanet Ruby

RegexPlanet offers a free-to-use Regular Expression Test Page to help you check RegEx in Ruby free-of-cost.

Garden (Clojure) logo Garden (Clojure)

Unlike the mini-languages that are other pre/post-processor options, Garden leverages the full power of the Clojure programming language for CSS.
  • RegexPlanet Ruby Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-26
  • Garden (Clojure) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-17

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to RegexPlanet Ruby and Garden (Clojure))

RegexPlanet Ruby

Garden (Clojure)

Regular Expressions
100 100%
Regular Expressions
0% 0
CSS Framework
0 0%
CSS Framework
100% 100
Development
100 100%
Development
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using RegexPlanet Ruby and Garden (Clojure). For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Garden (Clojure) seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

RegexPlanet Ruby mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of RegexPlanet Ruby yet. Tracking of RegexPlanet Ruby recommendations started around Jul 2021.

Garden (Clojure) mentions (2)

  • What working with Tailwind CSS every day for 2 years looks like
    Thanks for the vanilla-extract recommendation, I'll be using this! In my case, tailwind was useful for providing a handy set of vocabularies for simple and common stylings. But once customizations start to pile on, we're back into SCSS. Using 2 systems at once meant additionally gluing them with the postcss toolchain, so effectively we have 3 preprocessors running for every style refresh. Looking in at TypeScript... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Clojure Single Codebase?
    I spent some time doing this ~3 years ago, so I don't know about now, but to my knowledge it was the only language where you could really use one language for everything: no HTML (via hiccup), no CSS (via garden), clojure/clojurescript everywhere, and no shell (via babashka). Source: almost 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing RegexPlanet Ruby and Garden (Clojure), you can also consider the following products

rubular - A ruby based regular expression editor

Stylecow - CSS processor to fix your css code and make it compatible with all browsers

RegExr - RegExr.com is an online tool to learn, build, and test Regular Expressions.

CSS Next - Use tomorrow’s CSS syntax, today.

RegEx Generator - RegEx Generator is a simple-to-use application that comes with the brilliance of intuitive regex and is also helping you out to test the regex.

PostCSS - Increase code readability. Add vendor prefixes to CSS rules using values from Can I Use. Autoprefixer will use the data based on current browser popularity and property support to apply prefixes for you.

Loading...