Reflect.run VS Cypress.io
Compare Reflect.run VS Cypress.io and see what are their differences
Limey: Connect smarter with QR codes, links, sites, and digital business cards in one place.
featured
Reflect.run
Selenium
Testim
Testsigma
Ghost Inspector
BugBug.io
Monkey Test It
mabl
Cypress.io
Selenium
Katalon
puppeteer
Robot framework
BrowserStack
Sauce Labs
LambdaTest
Reflect is a tool that helps you test any website without writing any code. All you need to create a test is a URL. Our cloud-based browser allows you to interact with your website just like a normal browser. Behind the scenes, Reflect captures all of your actions and builds a repeatable test script. When you're finished, you can run that test script whenever you want within our automated platform. So, if you can use your site, you can test your site.
Reflect supports nearly all browser interactions out-of-the-box, including hovers and drag-and-drops. It offers visual assertions for ensuring the appearance of your webapp, and includes test editing functionality and API access.
Reflect.run Cypress.ioReflect.run is recommended for software development teams, QA engineers, and product managers who want to implement automated end-to-end testing without the complexity typically associated with code-based test scripts. It is particularly suitable for small to medium-sized businesses, agile teams, and startups that prioritize quick deployment and efficiency in their testing processes.
Based on our record, Cypress.io should be more popular than Reflect.run. It has been mentiond 28 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Playwright is good but there is also other kind of tools like https://reflect.run/ and https://ghostinspector.com/ that are perfect for end user testing. Hope it helps. Source: about 2 years ago
Is it possible to personalize your pitches to individual users? At our startup [1] we try to get straight to point when pitching the product and demo something that is as close as possible to how the person we're talking to would actually use the product. For example, here's a video I just recorded a few minutes ago for someone that I've been talking to via email:... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
I've definitely had reflect.run on my radar, and agreed on the expensive AF part, mind if I reach out for your thoughts on what lead you/your team down to reflect.run and your experience with it so far? 😄. Source: about 3 years ago
Checkout reflect.run we just started using it. Expensive AF but pretty nice. Source: about 3 years ago
Yes definitely, there's lots of products in the QA space trying to tackle the problem you're describing. I'm a co-founder of a no-code product in the space (https://reflect.run). Being no-code has the advantage of enabling all QA testers to build test automation, regardless of coding experience. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
This is pretty cool - the Jira/Linear integration could save a ton of manual work. How do you handle test data setup and teardown? That's usually where these workflows get messy. For alternatives in this space, there's qawolf (https://qawolf.com) for similar automated testing workflows, or I'm actually building bug0 (https://bug0.com) which also does AI-powered test automation, still in beta. For the more... - Source: Hacker News / 12 days ago
Feature: Web Accessibility Tests Feature: Web Accessibility Tests Scenario Outline: Verify all WCAG Violations Given I am on the "" page And Verify all Accessibility Violations Scenario Outline: Verify P1,P2 WCAG Violations Given I am on the "" page And Verify only P1, P2 issues Examples: | url | | https://google.com | | https://amazon.in | | https://agoda.com | |... - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
In this blog post, we'll explore a Cypress test that replicates this scenario, utilizing the powerful intercept command to manipulate network requests and responses. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Maybe something like Cypress is what you're looking for? Cypress.io. Source: about 2 years ago
You won't be able to test the javascript function itself from within python, but you can exercise the front-end code using something like cypress (https://cypress.io) or the older but still respectable selenium (https://selenium.dev). Source: about 2 years ago
Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.
Testim - Stable, self-healing, end-to-end test automation via machine learning. Testim helps accelerate the delivery of high-quality software. Speed up test-authoring and improve the stability of automated, end-to-end tests.
Katalon - Built on the top of Selenium and Appium, Katalon Studio is a free and powerful automated testing tool for web testing, mobile testing, and API testing.
Testsigma - Complete AI-driven Test Automation platform for Web apps, Mobile apps and APIs. Simple English commands to automate complex tests easily and effectively with all the flexibility that enterprise teams need!
puppeteer - Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome or Chromium...
Ghost Inspector - Easily create automated browser tests for your websites and web apps. Ensure everything works and looks the way it should. No coding required. 14 day free trial!