Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Reference.com VS Apertium

Compare Reference.com VS Apertium and see what are their differences

Reference.com logo Reference.com

Reference.com is the #1 question answering service that delivers the best answers from the web and real people - all in one place.

Apertium logo Apertium

To see the whole list of general documentation pages written in English, see documentation in English. Pour ceux qui sont plus à l'aise avec la langue française, une partie des pages anglaises a été traduite.
  • Reference.com Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-27
  • Apertium Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-27

Reference.com videos

No Reference.com videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Apertium videos

Ubuntu'ya Apertium Kurulumu

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Reference.com and Apertium)
Languages
44 44%
56% 56
Translation Service
43 43%
57% 57
Translation Management
74 74%
26% 26
Translation
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Reference.com and Apertium. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Reference.com should be more popular than Apertium. It has been mentiond 13 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Reference.com mentions (13)

  • Name a player who is a “legend” for your team, but was never that good
    This wasn't for my team but, I was looking in this comment section for any mention of Billy Butler. Couldn't find any after maybe 2-3 minutes of looking. I remembered him being better than his stats on baseball-reference.com say he is. Maybe that was because I used to play a lot of MLB 2K11 when I was a younger. Source: over 1 year ago
  • [Newbie] Is my Powered USB Hub too close to my HF+ Discovery?
    You can use WSJT-X,FLDigi,and other programs with the sdr software,but I'm no help there,as I use ham transcievers for digital. Look on radio https://reference.com for just about anything that you're interested in. It even has a state by state section.along with a database for cities and counties. You can spend a long time on that site,and learn a lot. Source: over 1 year ago
  • [US] This or That? - Which of these baby animals is known as a pup? [08-15-2022]
    I think a lot of this depends on the site from where Microsoft culls their answers. For rat, the first that pops up when selecting it says a baby rat is a "kit," but if you search, it changes. Squeaks and nibbles says, "A baby rat is called a kitten or a pup," whereas reference.com says "a baby rat is called a pup.". Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Michael Kay on the Rich Eisen Show: "The #Yankees will not overpay for Aaron Judge, Based on what I've been hearing around Aaron Judge wants to be the highest paid position player, and would want $36M+ a year"
    Baseball reference.com shows him at 0 runs on defense, so perfectly average. NOt sure what you're looking at. I suppose statcast? I will have a look there. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • The conspiracy chart. Flat earth is exactly where I expected to find it.
    The TOP response (reference.com) says 800f open air to 1500 ideal. Source: almost 2 years ago
View more

Apertium mentions (3)

  • Ask HN: Tell us about your project that's not done yet but you want feedback on
    This is very cool, looking forward to it! I've been doing the same thing with Spanish Wikipedia articles for a while, using a few lines of Bash + Regex. I was using Apertium for it. https://apertium.org/ It's definitely worse than most ML-based solutions, but it works reliably and fast; you can run it entirely offline. With Spanish translations, the main problem I was facing is lack of vocabulary, so I created - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • Show HN: Unlimited machine translation API for $200 / Month
    I used to keep track of the state of machine translation some years back. I think the way you measure the success of an automated translation is edit distance, i.e. How many manual edits you need to make to a translated text before you reach some acceptable state. I suppose it's somewhat subjective, but it is possible to construct a benchmark and allow for multiple correct results. The best resources I knew back... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Google Summer of Code 2021 Mentoring Orgs announced!
    Apertium is one of them. We make open-source rule-based machine translation systems, and our core tools are in C++. A few of our proposed ideas involve modifying those C++ tools with new features or improvements to existing features. Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Reference.com and Apertium, you can also consider the following products

Google Translate - Google's free service instantly translates words, phrases, and web pages between English and over 100 other languages.

Crowdin - Localize your product in a seamless way

DeepL Translator - DeepL Translator is a machine translator that currently supports 42 language combinations.

Microsoft Translator - Microsoft Translator is your door to a wider world.

Yandex.Translate - Yandex.Translate is an online dictionary and translation solution.

Lingoes - Lingoes is an easy and intuitive dictionary and text translation software.