RedwoodJS mentions (40)

• The Current State of React Server Components: A Guide for the Perplexed

  The other piece of important information to acknowledge here is that when we say RSCs need a framework, “framework” effectively just means “Next.js.” There are some smaller frameworks (like Waku) that support RSCs. There are also some larger and more established frameworks (like Redwood) that have plans to support RSCs or (like Gatsby) only support RSCs in beta. We will likely see this change once we get React 19... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• What will happen to the full-stack framework in the future?

  Although there are quite a few opinionated battery-included frameworks that have picked up everything for you like RedwoodJS, Blitz, and Create-T3-App, you still need to choose between them and hope that they will remain mainstream and well-maintained in the future. So how should we choose? - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

• NextJS vs RedwoodJS

  Web development frameworks in JavaScript, such as NextJS and RedwoodJS, have gained popularity among developers. Choosing the right framework, library, or tool for a project is crucial for efficient development. Developers often seek the best tools to save time and avoid reinventing the wheel. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

• Ask HN: I'm abandoning NextJS. What's an alternative full-stack TS solution?

  The community here is pretty friendly. https://redwoodjs.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

• Is Next.js 13 + RSC a Good Choice? I Built an App Without Client-Side Javascript to Find Out

  Next.js 13 ignited the first wave of attention to React Server Components (RSC) around the end of last year. Over time, other frameworks, like Remix and RedwoodJS, have also started to put RSC into their future road maps. However, the entire "moving computation to the server-side" direction of React/Next.js has been highly controversial from the very beginning. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago

Domainz.io mentions (0)