RedwoodJS
Refine
Blitz.js
Next.js
KeystoneJS
ZEIT
Wasp-lang Alpha
Amplication
ASP.NET
Ruby on Rails
Django
Laravel
Node.js
Flask
ExpressJS
Meteor
RedwoodJS ASP.NETBased on our record, RedwoodJS should be more popular than ASP.NET. It has been mentiond 41 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Have a look at the graph above. Laravel and Rails have been around for 13-15 years! The JavaScript frameworks being used in comparison are just getting started, with some of them, like Wasp and Redwood, at similar stages in their development as Laravel and Rails were during their initial years. - Source: dev.to / 19 days ago
The other piece of important information to acknowledge here is that when we say RSCs need a framework, “framework” effectively just means “Next.js.” There are some smaller frameworks (like Waku) that support RSCs. There are also some larger and more established frameworks (like Redwood) that have plans to support RSCs or (like Gatsby) only support RSCs in beta. We will likely see this change once we get React 19... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
Although there are quite a few opinionated battery-included frameworks that have picked up everything for you like RedwoodJS, Blitz, and Create-T3-App, you still need to choose between them and hope that they will remain mainstream and well-maintained in the future. So how should we choose? - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
Web development frameworks in JavaScript, such as NextJS and RedwoodJS, have gained popularity among developers. Choosing the right framework, library, or tool for a project is crucial for efficient development. Developers often seek the best tools to save time and avoid reinventing the wheel. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
The community here is pretty friendly. https://redwoodjs.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
Web Applications: ASP.NET, a powerful framework for building web applications, is primarily based on C#. Developers can create dynamic websites, web APIs, and services with ASP.NET. - Source: dev.to / 15 days ago
The Bold Reporting Tools ASP.NET MVC and ASP.NET Web Forms will no longer be deployed in the embedded build. However, bug fixes are diligently transferred to our public repositories until Microsoft officially announces the end of support for these platforms. For new web application development or to stay up-to-date, Blazor or ASP.NET Core are recommended. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
Sorry for the possibly dumb questions. But then does .NET 5 have a "Model View Controller" workflow? I'm seeing ASP.NET still exists. But it's just "ASP.NET", no "MVC" or "Core" attached to the end. And they seem to recommend Blazor instead of C# which is something I only know the name of. Source: over 1 year ago
Cloud functions run aspnet core under the hood, but since it is a controlled environment it was designed in a way that the only concern you should worry about is running your function so all of the usual boilerplate related to adding services, middleware or enabling features is hidden away from you which for most simple scenarios this is what you will need and in the case of F# where dependency injection is more... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
I'm doing "backend data processing microservices" and the main framework component is ASP. Source: over 1 year ago
Refine - A React Framework for building internal tools, admin panels, dashboards & B2B apps with unmatched flexibilty.
Ruby on Rails - Ruby on Rails is an open source full-stack web application framework for the Ruby programming...
Blitz.js - Rails-like framework for React apps, built on Next.js
Django - The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines
Next.js - A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps
Laravel - A PHP Framework For Web Artisans