Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Redpanda VS Apache Flink

Compare Redpanda VS Apache Flink and see what are their differences

Redpanda logo Redpanda

Redpanda is a powerful, yet simple, and cost-efficient streaming data platform that is compatible with Kafka® APIs while eliminating Kafka complexity.

Apache Flink logo Apache Flink

Flink is a streaming dataflow engine that provides data distribution, communication, and fault tolerance for distributed computations.
Not present
  • Apache Flink Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-03

Redpanda videos

No Redpanda videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Apache Flink videos

GOTO 2019 • Introduction to Stateful Stream Processing with Apache Flink • Robert Metzger

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Apache Flink Tutorial | Flink vs Spark | Real Time Analytics Using Flink | Apache Flink Training
  • Tutorial - How to build a modern stream processor: The science behind Apache Flink - Stefan Richter

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Redpanda and Apache Flink)
Developer Tools
20 20%
80% 80
Big Data
0 0%
100% 100
Queueing, Messaging And Background Processing
Stream Processing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Redpanda and Apache Flink. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Redpanda and Apache Flink

Redpanda Reviews

Best message queue for cloud-native apps
Redpanda message queue allows multiple producers to write messages to a single topic, and multiple consumers to read messages from that topic in parallel. Messages can be buffered in memory for fast delivery and persist to disk for durability. Redpanda also provides a number of features, such as replication, partitioning, and compression, to help manage large amounts of data.
Source: docs.vanus.ai

Apache Flink Reviews

We have no reviews of Apache Flink yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Flink seems to be a lot more popular than Redpanda. While we know about 28 links to Apache Flink, we've tracked only 1 mention of Redpanda. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Redpanda mentions (1)

  • Choosing Between a Streaming Database and a Stream Processing Framework in Python
    Stream-processing platforms such as Apache Kafka, Apache Pulsar, or Redpanda are specifically engineered to foster event-driven communication in a distributed system and they can be a great choice for developing loosely coupled applications. Stream processing platforms analyze data in motion, offering near-zero latency advantages. For example, consider an alert system for monitoring factory equipment. If a... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

Apache Flink mentions (28)

  • Show HN: An SQS Alternative on Postgres
    You should let the Apache Flink team know, they mention exactly-once processing on their home page (under "correctness guarantees") and in their list of features. [0] https://flink.apache.org/ [1] https://flink.apache.org/what-is-flink/flink-applications/#building-blocks-for-streaming-applications. - Source: Hacker News / 13 days ago
  • Top 10 Common Data Engineers and Scientists Pain Points in 2024
    Data scientists often prefer Python for its simplicity and powerful libraries like Pandas or SciPy. However, many real-time data processing tools are Java-based. Take the example of Kafka, Flink, or Spark streaming. While these tools have their Python API/wrapper libraries, they introduce increased latency, and data scientists need to manage dependencies for both Python and JVM environments. For example,... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Choosing Between a Streaming Database and a Stream Processing Framework in Python
    Other stream processing engines (such as Flink and Spark Streaming) provide SQL interfaces too, but the key difference is a streaming database has its storage. Stream processing engines require a dedicated database to store input and output data. On the other hand, streaming databases utilize cloud-native storage to maintain materialized views and states, allowing data replication and independent storage scaling. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Go concurrency simplified. Part 4: Post office as a data pipeline
    Also, this knowledge applies to learning more about data engineering, as this field of software engineering relies heavily on the event-driven approach via tools like Spark, Flink, Kafka, etc. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Five Apache projects you probably didn't know about
    Apache SeaTunnel is a data integration platform that offers the three pillars of data pipelines: sources, transforms, and sinks. It offers an abstract API over three possible engines: the Zeta engine from SeaTunnel or a wrapper around Apache Spark or Apache Flink. Be careful, as each engine comes with its own set of features. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Redpanda and Apache Flink, you can also consider the following products

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.

Apache Spark - Apache Spark is an engine for big data processing, with built-in modules for streaming, SQL, machine learning and graph processing.

NATS - NATS.io is an open source messaging system for cloud native applications, IoT messaging, Edge, and microservices architectures.

Amazon Kinesis - Amazon Kinesis services make it easy to work with real-time streaming data in the AWS cloud.

Apache Pulsar - Apache Pulsar is an open-source, distributed messaging and streaming platform built for the cloud.

Spring Framework - The Spring Framework provides a comprehensive programming and configuration model for modern Java-based enterprise applications - on any kind of deployment platform.