Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

RedGate SQL Monitor VS Browsh

Compare RedGate SQL Monitor VS Browsh and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

RedGate SQL Monitor logo RedGate SQL Monitor

SQL Monitor helps you and your team find issues – before they become problems

Browsh logo Browsh

A fully-modern text-based browser, rendering to TTY and browsers
  • RedGate SQL Monitor Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-13
  • Browsh Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-04

RedGate SQL Monitor features and specs

  • Comprehensive Monitoring
    RedGate SQL Monitor provides robust and detailed monitoring of SQL servers, databases, and associated infrastructure. It tracks performance metrics, resource usage, and potential issues across your environment.
  • Customizable Alerting
    The tool offers customizable alerting systems that notify users of potential issues based on predefined or custom thresholds, allowing for proactive issue resolution.
  • Historical Data Analysis
    SQL Monitor maintains historical performance data, enabling users to analyze trends over time, identify recurring problems, and plan for future capacity needs.
  • Intuitive Dashboard
    The intuitive and user-friendly dashboard provides an at-a-glance view of the health and performance of your entire SQL Server estate, making it easier to spot and address issues quickly.
  • Integration Capabilities
    It integrates well with various third-party tools and services, such as PagerDuty, Slack, and Microsoft Teams, facilitating seamless communication and collaboration.
  • Scalability
    RedGate SQL Monitor is designed to scale with your organization, handling both small and large SQL Server estates with ease.

Possible disadvantages of RedGate SQL Monitor

  • Cost
    The licensing and subscription fees can be relatively high, which may be prohibitive for smaller organizations or startups with limited budgets.
  • Learning Curve
    While the interface is user-friendly, there is still a learning curve associated with understanding and fully leveraging all of its features, particularly for users who are not experienced with SQL Server monitoring.
  • Resource Intensive
    SQL Monitor can be resource-intensive, potentially impacting the performance of the server on which it is running if not properly managed.
  • Complex Configuration
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex and time-consuming, especially in large environments with multiple instances and different configurations.
  • Limited NoSQL Support
    It's primarily focused on SQL Server environments, offering limited support for NoSQL databases, which may be a drawback for organizations using a mix of database technologies.

Browsh features and specs

  • Low Bandwidth Usage
    Browsh uses textual and minimal visual elements by rendering web pages in a text-based browser like Lynx, which reduces the bandwidth requirement significantly.
  • Compatibility with Modern Websites
    Unlike traditional text-based browsers, Browsh can handle modern web technologies like HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, making it more adaptable to contemporary web standards.
  • Remote Access
    Browsh can be used over SSH, allowing users to browse the internet from a remote server, which is beneficial in accessing blocked content or when local internet is slow.
  • System Resources Efficiency
    Browsh primarily operates in a terminal, consuming fewer system resources compared to graphic-intensive web browsers, ideal for users on older hardware.
  • Privacy
    Running Browsh on a remote server can enhance user privacy by hiding the user's IP address and isolating sessions from the local machine.

Possible disadvantages of Browsh

  • Limited Visual Experience
    As Browsh primarily functions in a text-based environment, it lacks the full visual and interactive experience of a fully-featured graphical web browser.
  • Learning Curve
    Users may find navigating and understanding the terminal interface challenging, particularly for those unfamiliar with using command-line tools.
  • JavaScript Limitations
    Even though Browsh supports JavaScript, complex functionalities might not render as effectively as in graphic browsers, potentially impacting interactive web applications.
  • Limited Multimedia Support
    Multimedia content, like videos or animated graphics, may not display perfectly, limiting the user's ability to consume certain types of content.
  • Setup Complexity
    Setting up Browsh to work optimally, especially for remote access scenarios, can be more complex compared to regular web browsers, requiring some technical knowledge.

RedGate SQL Monitor videos

No RedGate SQL Monitor videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Browsh videos

Browsh A Text based Browser that is Actually Pretty Good! | Odd Projects #2

More videos:

  • Review - Linux Fails on the Desktop, Plus Arch Malware and the Browsh Browser
  • Review - Linux Terminal Browser [Browsh]

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to RedGate SQL Monitor and Browsh)
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Web Browsers
0 0%
100% 100
Website Monitoring
100 100%
0% 0
Rental Property Management

User comments

Share your experience with using RedGate SQL Monitor and Browsh. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Browsh seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 13 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

RedGate SQL Monitor mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of RedGate SQL Monitor yet. Tracking of RedGate SQL Monitor recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Browsh mentions (13)

  • This doesn’t sound right. Thoughts?
    Well I do also regularly make use of brow.sh expecially when I hit the slow hours of the internet. I just login to my old ssh sdf.org shell account and away I go. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Who wants to be hired? (November 2022)
    15 years experience. You may have seen my text-based modern browser, https://brow.sh, here on the front page a few times. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Is it still possible to live in a terminal?
    You might be interested in https://brow.sh. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Freelancer? Seeking freelancer? (May 2022)
    Some of you may know me from https://brow.sh `. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • [plugin] browse internet from neovim
    That looks really useful! It would be even nicer to see something like this, but integrated with brow.sh for those who prefer to stay on the terminal. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing RedGate SQL Monitor and Browsh, you can also consider the following products

ServerSuit - ServerSuit is a browser based program that enables remote Linux administration, monitoring, website hosting, and server setup automation.

W3M - w3m is a text-based web browser as well as a pager like ' ...

AppZero - AppZero is a monitoring and migration tool that allows users to keep track of different applications and servers in both simple and complex IT environments.

Links - Links is a graphics and text mode web browser, released under GPL. Links is free software.

Netumo - Ensure healthy website performance, uptime, and free from vulnerabilities. Automatic checks for SSL Certificates, domains and monitor issues with your websites all from one console and get instant notifications on any issues.

Lynx.invisible-island.net - Thomas Dickey is the maintainer/developer of the Lynx text-browser. This page gives some background and pointers to Lynx resources.