Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Reality Editor VS My Devices

Compare Reality Editor VS My Devices and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Reality Editor logo Reality Editor

MIT's new app lets you program any object

My Devices logo My Devices

Drag and drop IoT project builder for Raspberry Pi
  • Reality Editor Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-01-21
  • My Devices Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-27

Reality Editor features and specs

  • Intuitive Interface
    The Reality Editor provides a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to interact with and manipulate smart objects through augmented reality.
  • Seamless Integration
    It allows for seamless integration with various smart devices, enabling users to control and program them directly from the app.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project, Reality Editor encourages community contributions and continuous improvements, as well as transparency in its operations.
  • Customizability
    Users can customize interactions and functionalities of smart objects, enhancing personal control and tailoring experiences to individual preferences.

Possible disadvantages of Reality Editor

  • Limited Device Compatibility
    The Reality Editor may not be compatible with all smart devices, which could limit its usability for certain users.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its intuitive interface, new users might still face a learning curve when trying to understand its full potential and capabilities.
  • Dependence on AR
    The application heavily depends on augmented reality technology, which might not be fully supported on older or less advanced mobile devices.
  • Privacy Concerns
    As with many applications that interact with smart devices, there may be concerns around data privacy and security.

My Devices features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    My Devices offers a clean and intuitive user interface, making it easy for users of all technical levels to navigate and manage their IoT devices.
  • Wide Device Compatibility
    The platform supports a broad range of IoT devices, allowing users to connect and manage different brands and types of devices seamlessly.
  • Scalability
    My Devices is designed to scale easily, accommodating both small-scale implementations and large enterprise-level IoT deployments.
  • Customizable Solutions
    It provides options for tailoring solutions to meet specific business needs, allowing users to create specific workflows and automation processes.
  • Comprehensive Support
    My Devices offers extensive support resources, including documentation, tutorials, and customer support, to help users quickly resolve issues.

Possible disadvantages of My Devices

  • Learning Curve
    While the interface is user-friendly, new users may still face a learning curve when first setting up and integrating their devices with the platform.
  • Cost
    Some users might find the pricing plans expensive, especially small businesses or individual users who have limited budgets.
  • Limited Offline Functionality
    The platform requires an internet connection to access and manage devices, which can be a limitation for applications requiring offline capabilities.
  • Potential Integration Challenges
    While My Devices supports various devices, some users may experience integration challenges depending on the specific hardware or protocols used.
  • Dependence on Third-Party Services
    Reliance on third-party services for device connectivity and data processing might result in potential security and reliability concerns.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Reality Editor and My Devices)
Virtual Reality
100 100%
0% 0
Data Dashboard
0 0%
100% 100
Project Management
100 100%
0% 0
Home
33 33%
67% 67

User comments

Share your experience with using Reality Editor and My Devices. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, My Devices seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Reality Editor mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Reality Editor yet. Tracking of Reality Editor recommendations started around Mar 2021.

My Devices mentions (2)

  • Do you own/use any IoT devices that use the Helium network?
    I've used outdoor soil sensors from mydevices.com. Once I told them to stop trying to upsell me on the Lora gateways and use Helium, its worked flawlessly. Its been like 6 months and the battery still registers 100%. Reports every 15 minutes and the data credits find their way to 3-4 different hotspots in the area. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Help me understand mining HNT a bit more
    Another site that shows data transfer activity: https://mappers.helium.com/ Here's some examples of potential uses: https://www.lonestartracking.com/ (track anything anywhere) my brother wishes he had one of these when his maintenance truck stolen. https://mydevices.com/ (plug and play IOT sensors) I'm talking to one of my customers who is a landscape architect, he wants to monitor his larger landscape projects... Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Reality Editor and My Devices, you can also consider the following products

Losant IoT Platform - Build and visualize real-time IoT solutions with ease.

Nim Home Assistant (NimHA) - Nim Home Assistant is an open-source home automation platform running on Nim.

Stringify - Smart Automation Home, Work, Life, IoT

Google Home - Set up, manage, and control your Chromecast, Chromecast Audio and Google Home devices.

Wia - Full stack for the Internet of Things

ioBroker - flexible and modular application for the IoT and Smarthome